Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Evidently, there's been a strong conflict between commonsense and bureaucracy.

If I had to choose between the two, I'd choose commonsense every time.

Besides, when you go over the posts, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see who's constructive and who's not.

There's a symbiotic relationship going on here NOT nepotism.

Get real and cool it!

Great DVD btw! :down:

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I vote for Terry for post of the year. That was rather amusing.

The coverage of an SAU event would do more for the club and the community as a whole then trader fees would.

srsly having a sook about Andrew posting about his DVD isn't going accomplish anything. If mods/admin didn't want it happening they would have removed the threads.

Alot of people post about workshops they have been too and recommend them, should they pay trader fees because of this?

Keep up the good work Andrew, can't wait for the next one ;)

Alot of people post about workshops they have been too and recommend them, should they pay trader fees because of this?

Seriously? You went looking for an analogy, and that's what you found?

The rules state that people can't advertise their own business. You know, the part about them being a "trader" and all?

People talking about someone else's business that they have no commercial interest in clearly doesn't fall afoul of the rules, since they're not the actual trader.

Andrew got it first go, hence why he said "I should have gotten someone else to post it up and avoided the issue".

As they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity. If all this thread bumping is getting everyone else reading it and finding out about the DVD, [200] is doing JET Multimedia a favour.

Like I said before, I have no intention of even watching it let alone buying it...

Ok seriously answer me this, why would you go out of your way to not watch it. Fair enough if you don't want to buy it cause you are a tight ass for $15, that i can understand. But to actually say, "I am going to intentionally not watch this" shows me that you have some sort of agenda about this. Don't give me a smart ass reply, im being serious, why would you now watch it and make such a big f**king deal about this? You are on a Skyline forum, you perhaps own or have owned a skyline, you post on here enough to show you have an interest in Skylines (if not and you have no interest in Skylines than why the f**k are you on this forum?) , so if some one posts a thread about a Skyline DVD, regardless of the advertising bullshit that you keep spinning, why would you make it such an obvious thing that you aren't going to watch it?

Answer me this, say Andrew did make donations on here and was a business trader, would you still not watch it, if so once again, why?

Only thing i can think of that would make some one like you not watch it after all the things i have listed is Andrew has in some way affected your life personally and you have an agenda with him. If not, please for the love of god, shut the f**k up about this.

On a positive note, great DVD Andrew, absolutely loved it :D

Edited by PM-R33
Seriously? You went looking for an analogy, and that's what you found?

The rules state that people can't advertise their own business. You know, the part about them being a "trader" and all?

People talking about someone else's business that they have no commercial interest in clearly doesn't fall afoul of the rules, since they're not the actual trader.

Andrew got it first go, hence why he said "I should have gotten someone else to post it up and avoided the issue".

As they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity. If all this thread bumping is getting everyone else reading it and finding out about the DVD, [200] is doing JET Multimedia a favour.

I see

how does this make you feel?

Ok seriously answer me this, why would you go out of your way to not watch it. Fair enough if you don't want to buy it cause you are a tight ass for $15, that i can understand. But to actually say, "I am going to intentionally not watch this" shows me that you have some sort of agenda about this. Don't give me a smart ass reply, im being serious, why would you now watch it and make such a big f**king deal about this? You are on a Skyline forum, you perhaps own or have owned a skyline, you post on here enough to show you have an interest in Skylines (if not and you have no interest in Skylines than why the f**k are you on this forum?) , so if some one posts a thread about a Skyline DVD, regardless of the advertising bullshit that you keep spinning, why would you make it such an obvious thing that you aren't going to watch it?

Answer me this, say Andrew did make donations on here and was a business trader, would you still not watch it, if so once again, why?

Only thing i can think of that would make some one like you not watch it after all the things i have listed is Andrew has in some way affected your life personally and you have an agenda with him. If not, please for the love of god, shut the f**k up about this.

On a positive note, great DVD Andrew, absolutely loved it :P

You want me to be serious when you put questions to me like that?

Reword your questions in a more polite way otherwise I won't reply.

;)

You want me to be serious when you put questions to me like that?

Reword your questions in a more polite way otherwise I won't reply.

:P

You mean that apart from that reply you wont reply??

The word of this production is definately spreading. I know at least two copies have gone overseas. One went to Japan...

"You can come out now children! That boogie-man-pretend-policeman has gone to sleep. We've escaped now to Tokyo and the Concierge downstairs here at the New Otani Hotel has loaned us his new personal DVD called MOTIVE #3. He recommends Chapter 8 to stop you from getting Homesick" :3some:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...