Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I bought the 152 tooth timing belt that Spool imports supply for the rb25/30 conversion.. But its not long enough... !! My fault not Spools!

I used the rb30det.pdf thats around to setup my tensioner pulley. Were its written in a picture were to mount the tensioner.

i need a other belt that is 2 - 3 tooth longer.. 4 -5 tooth will prob be okay also. Were and what can i use? I have looked in Dayco wepshop, and can see the tooth proflile for the belt used in the .pdf file is: STP8M (Dayco number 94407).

Can I use other tooth profile? Or is my only option the 164 tooth long belt? If still need to be STP8M profile...? Do you think i can use the 164 tooth belt??

Really hope someone can help me out here.

Edited by nissan200sx.dk
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292829-other-option-for-timing-belt/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CA series motors only run a 3/4 inch belt ~19mm wide, the rb belt is inch ~ 25mm wide. Are you sure your belt is not hanging over the side of the idler?? it will wreck the belt in minutes of running

i would say that you will wreck the belt like that.

Can you get another RB tensioner? they are the correct width and also seem to be cheaper than the RB idler pulleys. Plus like proengines said, you can adjust it to suit

Looks liek you either need to re-drill and tap the top tensioner, or contact gates belts and get them to make you a custon lentgh belt. The next size they do in 8mm HTD is 164 teeth which is 96mm longer than the belt you have now and probably too long?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...