Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My tuner (Unigroup Engineering) says he can squeeze another 20rwkw out of my R33 Hypergear Highflow if I do away with my Batmbl Split Dump/Front pipe and go for a Bellmouth type Dump/Front pipe whilst still retaining the standard 33 housing. I have no reason to disbelieve him as those of you that know him would agree that he is one of the best in the biz.

My question is as this turbo is producing 230rwkw @15psi with all the usual supporting mods and is capable of running approx 20psi is there anybody out there that has acheived this kind of increase changing from split to bellmouth??

I have spoken to Stao and he says that although the compressor should be ok for about 270rwkws at 24psi Im still held back by the standard 33 housing, but I love the response that I have and want to keep it that way if I can so Im not real keen on moving to the .63 rear housing.

Any of you guys think 250rwkw is genuinely acheivable with just a dump pipe change?

GcG have told me that they have pulled it off with the 33 rear but with the tradeoff of a little lag, so Im a little confused.

Im keen to hear your opinions.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/293654-split-dump-vs-bellmouth-dump/
Share on other sites

I had a split dump and went to a bellmouth. My split dump kept causing boost spikes and couldnt hold boost. Solved it with the bellmouth. I think 20rwkw (40ishHP at the engine) is a bit of a stretch. Maybe 5-10rwkw throughout the rev range yes.

Funny you say that cause it has been known to spike before.

Will any old bellmouth do (within reason, not sh1t) like a JJR one or should I spend some bigger $$$

I have seen some up to the US $700 mark

most split dumps are pretty poorly designed and cause a restriction for the gate if anything... the only decent one i have seen on the market is from AM Performance.

in saying that, i doubt you'll make more or less power with a bell mouth, just pick up some more response with a well designed split dump.

My tuner (Unigroup Engineering) says he can squeeze another 20rwkw out of my R33 Hypergear Highflow if I do away with my Batmbl Split Dump/Front pipe and go for a Bellmouth type Dump/Front pipe whilst still retaining the standard 33 housing. I have no reason to disbelieve him as those of you that know him would agree that he is one of the best in the biz.

My question is as this turbo is producing 230rwkw @15psi with all the usual supporting mods and is capable of running approx 20psi is there anybody out there that has acheived this kind of increase changing from split to bellmouth??

I have spoken to Stao and he says that although the compressor should be ok for about 270rwkws at 24psi Im still held back by the standard 33 housing, but I love the response that I have and want to keep it that way if I can so Im not real keen on moving to the .63 rear housing.

Any of you guys think 250rwkw is genuinely acheivable with just a dump pipe change?

GcG have told me that they have pulled it off with the 33 rear but with the tradeoff of a little lag, so Im a little confused.

Im keen to hear your opinions.

ive found the hks style dumps to be the best, the ces split style ones dont seem to offer any benefit other than a lighter wallet. We did back to back testing with the cheap DRIFT (trust/tomei copy) and the CES split on a s15 with gt2871r and found no difference.

most split dumps are pretty poorly designed and cause a restriction for the gate if anything... the only decent one i have seen on the market is from AM Performance.

in saying that, i doubt you'll make more or less power with a bell mouth, just pick up some more response with a well designed split dump.

Im pretty sure the AM Perfomance ones are sort of the same design (at the turbo housing flange part anyway) as the Batmbl/Bos Importing ones. Do AM make the full Front/Dumps or just the dumps?

Got a link?

hey Dave,

as long as it is a 3" i dont think it will make much difference. i think i paid $80 on ebay for mine and have had no problems with it. just check the flatness of the face that bolts up to the turbo and square up if out. dont think it will make much difference on the power side but definitely stabilizes boost.

ive found the hks style dumps to be the best, the ces split style ones dont seem to offer any benefit other than a lighter wallet. We did back to back testing with the cheap DRIFT (trust/tomei copy) and the CES split on a s15 with gt2871r and found no difference.

are you talking about the "xs power" hks copies? i have always assumed theses are not the greatest as they have a 2.5" main pipe and a 1" (i think) gate split but then all the flow is guided back into a 2.5" pipe before hitting the front pipe?!?

would you not be better with a bellmouth 3" or a ces style split that the gate pipe runs back into a 3" pipe further down the exhaust?

My current setup is exactly like that (1" split into 3" pipe further back) and this is what my tuner believes the restriction is. Boost creep or whatever you want to call it sometimes happens with this setup. I have had a look at nengun and the full hks dump/front is a bellmouth style and they have said it's a good match for my hks exhaust (3.5")

I also like the moonface dump which has a sort of streched out barrel type area but at $700 it's a bit exxy. I'll post pics of the two when I get home

I changed my bellmouth dumps (Mine) to splits (Greddy) and boost came in a few hundreds rpm earlier without any tuning.

I cant recall the exact rpms, but definitely more than 500 and less than 1500rpms...too long ago to remember.

I did not have a chance to put the car on the dyno to test out so I don't really know if this "positive" pressure means earlier power or more restriction.

So here are the two I am interested in trying out, thisHKS pipe (Is this the one you were talking about Trent?)

And this Moonface one. I know somebody on these forums has one but I cant seem to find the thread about it. I read it a while back.

I am really interested in finding out some user info on the moonface pipe as I am very curious about this design

Has anyone out there had experience with these two pipes?

A better alternative to a Split?

Im pretty sure the AM Perfomance ones are sort of the same design (at the turbo housing flange part anyway) as the Batmbl/Bos Importing ones. Do AM make the full Front/Dumps or just the dumps?

Got a link?

AM Performance make the full dump/front pipe and they're incredibly well built. I'm pretty sure the BATMBL dumps were in fact made by Andrew at AM Performance.

Andrew - 0401865373

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...