Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There's still only one servo to get it from in NSW... kind of limiting.

Ye same for us :down:

I never saw PULP mentioned before you, Nismoid - I thought E85 is pump gas in Oz these days, too? It is showing up a lot around the world....

Well 700cc injectors gives it away, you'd need 1000cc or bigger using E85 :)

There is only a couple of servo's in Melb.

To give you an idea... The closest to me (and i live basically in the city), is 30mins drive one way.

If some one says they want a certain amount of power, i think we need to assume it is on 98 octane. It is a bit pointless telling some one they can make the power on "x" turbo, they go an buy it, try to make the power and can't. Then when they come back you say "oh sorry, i ment it would make that power on C16, E85, Nitrous..." etc.

I also wouldn't classify E85 as pump gas in Oz.

Couldn't agree more.

E85 is like saying you made that power on C16 - utterly irrelevant for most people being you can't get E85 anywhere in most states.

and that is that...

Maybe you should read the first post then?

700cc injectors

i want a single top mounted turbo and want to make 350rwk

700cc injectors should manage it on e85...

but either way i agree with pm-r33, when people ask for a power figure, its PULP unless otherwise stated...

Fair enough, I wasn't sure if E85 was quickly becoming the new premium or not - I'd imagine if it came out here we'd all be getting tuned on it. I know everyone who has access to E10 here are doing so :down:

It was meant to spread to heaps of servo's here in Melb really quickly... this was around 12 months ago for Melb.

Since then not ONE of the servo's marked for E85 have started stocking it yet. Just the original few... So something serious must be going on to stop this becoming more widespread as it is a massive money maker. Few discussions with friends etc we roughly think its more profitable than PULP so why a company wouldn't adopt a more profitable product must mean there are issues.

Either way - assumption always is PULP. We've never assumed it was C16, Sunoco104 or anything else in the past... to magically start now is silly.

Slightly different, E85 costs less than PULP per litre and officially could be available from the pump... so quite different from race gas. But yeah I get what you are saying.

I find it interesting that no one over there has managed to get more than 320-330kw @ wheels out of one on pump gas, though I am not sure exactly how harsh your dynos are. In the states there are people who have done around 350kw or so on PULP on Dynojet rolling roads and Dynapacks. Either way, I'd call a GT3582R more suitable for 350kw @ wheels on a drift car - you're going to be in high revs most of the time anyway, surely?

Slightly different, E85 costs less than PULP per litre and officially could be available from the pump... so quite different from race gas. But yeah I get what you are saying.

I find it interesting that no one over there has managed to get more than 320-330kw @ wheels out of one on pump gas, though I am not sure exactly how harsh your dynos are. In the states there are people who have done around 350kw or so on PULP on Dynojet rolling roads and Dynapacks. Either way, I'd call a GT3582R more suitable for 350kw @ wheels on a drift car - you're going to be in high revs most of the time anyway, surely?

dyno jets read quite high and ive noticed the us guys tend to qoute flywheel power when using dynapacks (they use the TC factor caculator)

The issue with E85 seems to be the storage tanks,no one wants to cough up for the required tanks and subsequent regs etc..

Out of curiosity what car is this RB26 going to be in ? I'm guessing a GTR wouldn't be such a good drift car ?

Probably the real thing to to know is what is "adequate" power output because if 350 is too much sizing a turbo to suit is a little pointless .

Now I know nothing about drift but if I again had to guess I'd think real strong mid range torque with good throttle and boost response - to the hoof - would be everything .

I'm thinking the "burning" question should be how much torque and how accurately can it be modulated .

Not my money but would an RB25 with a supercharger be simpler/cheaper ?

A .

Out of curiosity what car is this RB26 going to be in ? I'm guessing a GTR wouldn't be such a good drift car ?

Probably the real thing to to know is what is "adequate" power output because if 350 is too much sizing a turbo to suit is a little pointless .

Now I know nothing about drift but if I again had to guess I'd think real strong mid range torque with good throttle and boost response - to the hoof - would be everything .

I'm thinking the "burning" question should be how much torque and how accurately can it be modulated .

Not my money but would an RB25 with a supercharger be simpler/cheaper ?

A .

superchargers generally suck unfortunaly we do alot of superchargers on v8's and so forth and it is suprising how laggy most of the popular ones are.. makes a T51R look responsive :down:

typical boost curve for a charger --- >

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/po...boost-curve.jpg

Thread with a few graphs ive posted ----> http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Fi...66#entry4561766

A properly setup charger (900nm @ 3000rpm :) ) ----> post-a220072-mallo-charged.jpg

Edited by URAS
dyno jets read quite high and ive noticed the us guys tend to qoute flywheel power when using dynapacks (they use the TC factor caculator)

The issue with E85 seems to be the storage tanks,no one wants to cough up for the required tanks and subsequent regs etc..

Yes Trent is right!

The issue with E85 is the cost of the replacement tank lining. I was told it costs 40 GRAND per tank upgrade so as you can imagine who is going to spent that kinda cash on a upgrade that will not return the money for at least 5 - 10 years ?

It is also a legal requirement to have this upgrade to be able to stock E85.

Wait till holden brings out E85 flex. Things will change very fast.

My RB30DET ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at around 345 - 350 rwkw (mainline dyno)

There is plenty of info on my E85 thread about this stuff.... worth the read.

Yep :P

Fact. A GT3076 will not make 350rwkw on PULP. Nor will it make 360rwkw, or 374rwkw on PULP.

Fact. You will not make 350rwkw on E85 with 700cc injectors, nor will you make 360rwkw, or 374rwkw with those injectors.

Fact. A GT35 will do make 350rwkw on PULP with 700cc injectors, which is the question that was asked.

It's not the 'most responsive' option, but that power goal is in a little bit of no-mans land. However if you are drifting, the first 3500rpm of a tacho is rather pointless anyway.

Overall it's laughable to think E85 results (a specialist fuel no different to C16 at this stage, if anything C16 is EASIER to source) were brought into this thread just to try and backup incorrect facts...

And then try and call 'ignorance' :)

Shows how ignorant those with the incorrect facts really are.

lol

just to prove your "facts" wrong... i cant wait till conan7772 gets bigger injectors, pumps a extra 1-2psi into the motor and makes the extra whole 13rwkw to make 350rwkw on pump fuel no less

Guilt-Toys car was making 345-350rwkw with Nismo 740cc's on e85 bump the fuel pressure a little with a reg and you will make more with 700cc's

Noone said that 35R's will not make the power...

Edited by Cerbera

I could make 360rwkw from GT-SS's if i want, doesn't make it true though does it?

From page one incase you've forgotten it, again. :P

I couldn't care less what a dyno says until there is some real proof to back that up.

Of which, as usual, there is ... zero.

But then you do love your arguments without real evidence :P

Lemme know when you have the evidence, i suspect though... we'll never see it.

A GT3076 isn't going to make 350rwkw in a .82

Al has maxed his out @ 306rwkw or there abouts.

That is a solid 50rwkw shy really...

NYTSKY made 362rwkw with a 3076R and Denzo just made 374rwkw the other day...

your ignorance is always bliss

I couldn't care less what a dyno says until there is some real proof to back that up.

Of which, as usual, there is ... zero.

But then you do love your arguments without real evidence :P

Oh i see it is E85 - well that comes as little surprise, everyone seems to make a solid 40-50rwkw when changing from PULP (which everybody has access too), to E85 (which a lot of people do not)

It is not PULP 360rwkw...

There is no way the OP is going to make 360rwkw on E85 with 700c injectors, so he is clearly talking about PULP.

So its still back to exactly what i said, seems im not as ignorant as you are silly to put E85 results into a PULP thread... but that is fairly typical of you. :P

epic lol...

r31nismoid: 3076R is not going to make 350rwkw

cerbera: here are 2 that made more than 350rwkw

r31nismoid: i dont believe you, therefore your wrong

r31nismoid: *finds out he is wrong" epic backpedal and changes topic to e85

Edited by Cerbera

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...