Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's a bit of a scoop guys...let me know what you think.

My cousin's car (R34 Gtt tiptronic) was tested against a XR6 turbo and he lost!

Here are the stats:

1999 R34 GTT Tiptronic -vs- 2002 XR6 Turbo Tiptronic

Power (155 kw at the wheels) 233 kw at flywheel -vs- 300 kw at the flywheel

Greddy emanage tuned by SAS -vs- ChipTorque piggyback system

Greddy E01 boost set at .75 bar

Greddy FMIC

K&N high flow panel filter -vs- Cold Air Intake system

HKS Dump Pipe (3")

HKS front pipe (3")

High Flow Cat (3")

3.5" cat back exhaust (HKS?) -vs- Hi Tech Mufflers 3" exhaust system

18" ROH Drift R's 235 @ front -vs- standard wheels and tyres

265 @ rears

Tein HA adjustable suspension -vs- standard suspension

-front dampers set @ 14/16 hard

-rear dampers set @ 8/16 hard

(where 0 is softest and 16 is hardest)

Power to Weight = 155 kw per tonne -vs- Power to Weight = 176 kw per tonne

There's a bit of confusion about the R34's power output. My cous had shown me his dyno sheet from SAS after the Emanage install and it read 155 kw at the wheels(233 at flywheel). However, the "before" and "after" graphs clearly showed a 30.5 kw increase (which means that the "before" reading should be 124.5 (187 kw at flywheel) which seemed incorrect)

He had another dyno sheet from Unique AutoSports which was done while the car was fully stock. It read 141.9 kw at the wheels. Thus he had been telling us that the current figure should be around 172 kw at the wheels (259 kw at flywheel). I don't which is which.

The test was conducted at Oran Park with W Luff driving the Ford and Rick Shaw driving the Nissan. All up they did approximately 3 sets of 3 laps. This is what Rick had to say of the R34:

1. Great car to drive

2. Tiptronic system is slow, he had to adjust his driving style.

3. Trans feels like it needed a gear in between 2nd and 3rd. Certain parts of the track 2nd was revving too high and 3rd was revving too low.

4. Lacks bottom and mid-range grunt, but once in full song, car is very quick.

5. Cornering speed is equal to the Ford. (This is unbelievable).

6. Slower on the straight.

7. He was using 2nd and 3rd gears only around the track.

8. The trick with the Nissan (drifting) was to left foot brake while getting the bum out then apply throttle to induce wheel spin. With the Ford it was apparently just a matter of planting the foot onto the accelerator and drift is induced.

Both drivers were pushing the cars. Cous showed me a video of both doing drift action in turn one. Lots of smoke coming out of the rears on both. First lap the Ford was way ahead (2-3 car lengths) on the straight. Second lap the Nissan was ahead by about a car length.

My cousin was disappointed! He felt that he let the Skyline enthusiasts down on this one. He was wondering whether any of you would have any suggestions or comments. Perhaps the damper settings were not on optimum. Perhaps the front/rear height adjustments were not right. A friend was suggesting that if the front was way too low compared to the rear the weight distribution would not be ideal and would make the rears too skatey. He checked the air/fuel maps on the emanage and all cells (16x16) were on "0". This indicated factory settings. That may be the answer to the low to mid range lack of grunt dilemma.

I think the bottom line is that the XR6 with an extra 60 odd kws in its arsenal is simply more powerful. I could just imagine how a 300 kw line would fare against a 300 kw XR6T.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29734-233-kw-r34-gtt-vs-300kw-xr6-turbo/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Tiptronic is useless around a racetrack. Too slow to react, and it seems like it has badly chosen gear ratios judging by Rick Shaw's comments.

Don't listen to anyone who tells you that SAS dyno reads low. I've had my car dynoed at C&V, CRD and SAS all within about a month of each other and the readings were within 5kw of each other.

From memory:

C&V - 264rwkw @ 1.1 bar

CRD - 279rwkw @ 1.2 bar

SAS - 274rwkw @ 1.2 bar

So if your cousin's car only made 155kw @ wheels, then that is a HUGE power difference. Oran Park is a great racetrack. It has an excellent mixture of tight corners, weight swapping flip-flops and decent straights for those top end monsters to make up ground.

Just because your cousin has expensive Tein suspension, doesn't automatically make the car handle better. What about sway bars? upper arms? control arm? castor rods? tie rods? What were his alignment settings? It doesn't magically appear, you have to take the time to setup the car to your driving style.

What about tyres? Did your cousin spend all his money on shiny DriftRs and then put crappy Falken tyres on there that are useless for trackwork?

One last thing, is that with those mods, your cousin should be running higher boost. I'd run 1.0 bar... I know that people say that the R34 turbo is weaker than the R33 and R32 turbos, but I haven't heard any first hand evidence to prove that... only hearsay :D Why don't you convince your cousin to find out? :D

Cliffnotes: tiptronic = teh lose.

Was the XR6T auto as well? If not, I cant see how anyone would even bother comparing a manual to an auto car. Tiptronic does not mean anything except for sort of fancy slush box.

If someone went through the trouble of setting up this comparison, why didnt they bother getting a real transmission to go with it.

in an N/A form the xr6 would beat a GTS

cos you have the same concept

4l vs 2.5l

albiet the rb25de is strong, but i reckon the ford xr6 4l would be stonger

turbo'ing them both just gives a slight advantage

the advantage prolly goes to the ford too as it has a high base power which would result in quick spool and more effiency.

as far as i knew the xr6t was 220kw at the flywheel

not sure what the r34 is at the flywheel but i dont think its 220kw

I think xr6t was rated around 240kw at the flywheel because the latest xr8 is rated around 260kw. Only the fpv range would go up to 300kw I think.... not sure if they're out yet. Check the www.ford.com.au website for spec.

yeah thats true ... the only way to get a 300rwkw xr6 turbo is if its been modded .. and as far as i know ... it voids the warranty etc ... u can only get a fpv xr8 ... i've had a run with one in my totally stock 33 ... needless to say i lost ... but i want another run with some mods now :) ... i think it will be much closer :)

dont forget 4l turbo vs 2.5l turbo

the xr6t should come on boost a lot quicker, however its a smaller turbo (this sounds about right?)

the xr6 has a GT45 turbo, running 6psi. It makes 240Kw at the flywheel. The skyline turbo's are alot smaller than the xr6 garret ballbearingn ones. GT45's are the same size as the T60 turbo's everyone rages about (even larger). The 4.0litre inline makes alot of low end power, and the boost comes on in a very linear fashion, even though the turbo is large... Deosn't that say something about future upgrade ability.

I beat one in my GT-t but you have to get the gear changes right to do it. For instance from 1st to 2nd I hit the button at 5200rpm and it changes at 6200rpm (although it's going through the revs so quick it's hard to be accurate with that). That was stock v stock.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
    • Shock tower brace is in +5Kw....LOL  
×
×
  • Create New...