Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Although I am usually cautious, the other day I experimented with removing the boost restrictor on my R32 GTR to see what would happen. Car is mostly stock engine-wise, with only apexi pods and a 3.5" full exhaust (and perhaps what sounds suspiciously like an after-market fuel pump).

Some observations:

  • With the restrictor in, boost was peaking at 12.5psi
  • With the restrictor out, boost came on much quicker (:)) but peaked at just over 15psi (:P)

Some questions:

  • 12.5psi with the restrictor in seems pretty high compared to what I thought stock was (ie around 10?). Presume that this is just due to the free-er flowing exhaust?
  • I know people tend to be conservative with advising people against overboosting 15-year-old-ceramic-wheeled gtr turbos, but does anyone have insight as to what the safe limit is and whether peaking over 15psi is just stupid?
  • Rather than smash the old turbs, I am considering doing a full upgrade, but reckon that once I factor in turbos (~3k 2nd hand), a PFC (~$1k), injectors (~$0.7k) and a decent oil cooler (~$0.7k) I'm looking at around $6k plus $1k of labour. Is that the ballpark?

Cheers

Some questions:

  • 12.5psi with the restrictor in seems pretty high compared to what I thought stock was (ie around 10?). Presume that this is just due to the free-er flowing exhaust?
  • I know people tend to be conservative with advising people against overboosting 15-year-old-ceramic-wheeled gtr turbos, but does anyone have insight as to what the safe limit is and whether peaking over 15psi is just stupid?
  • Rather than smash the old turbs, I am considering doing a full upgrade, but reckon that once I factor in turbos (~3k 2nd hand), a PFC (~$1k), injectors (~$0.7k) and a decent oil cooler (~$0.7k) I'm looking at around $6k plus $1k of labour. Is that the ballpark?

Cheers

An R32 GTR is 20 years old - if you don't have $10,000 for a rebuild run it at the 12.5psi (exhaust raises stock boost).

For the upgrade - factor in $1000 for tune as well but you might get injectors & cooler cheaper & turbo price would depend.

point taken. I do have $10k but would rather spend it on a build rather than a rebuild :P

Another question: Can anyone explain the theoretical function of the boost restrictor to me? I've been studying the vacuum diagram, and it looks like the restrictor is in the line that goes to the wastegate actuators. To me it seems counter-intuitive that removing the restrictor works the way it does,

my brain says:

  • restrictor in => actuator sees pressure lower/later => wastegate opens later => more/earlier boost
  • restrictor out => actuator sees pressure higher/earlier => wastegate opens earlier => less/later boost

but the car says

  • restrictor in => ...? => less/later boost
  • restrictor out => ...? => more/earlier boost

Edited by semislickR32
What are you using to measure the boost pressure? Just wondering if it is a gauge issue as I have had one do the same.

i'm using a turbosmart eBoost2 controller gauge, which should be relatively accurate I guess.

And just in case you're wondering "why don't you just use the eBoost2 to control the boost instead of removing the restrictor?", it's because I haven't figured out how to hook it up yet - it was much easier on my old S15 with one turbo, non-cram-packed engine bay and an easy-to-understand vacuum diagram.

The R32GTR diagram in the manual is difficult to interpret to figure out where to get the boost signal from and how to get the solenoid control signal to the actuators... and previous forum searches and questions haven't been answered - poor me :P

With the EBC, you can use the existing wastegate actuator hose that goes to the stock boost controller, but you can't use the manifold pressure source the factory hose uses as it's from an already bled location at the rear near the clutch, need a new hose ran from the intake manifold to the EBC (and the bled source one blanked off). It's how Boostworx did the piping to my Gizzmo MS-IBC's actuator.

With the EBC, you can use the existing wastegate actuator hose that goes to the stock boost controller, but you can't use the manifold pressure source the factory hose uses as it's from an already bled location at the rear near the clutch, need a new hose ran from the intake manifold to the EBC (and the bled source one blanked off). It's how Boostworx did the piping to my Gizzmo MS-IBC's actuator.

thanks for the tip, that makes sense from looking at the diagram which shows that bleed. Do you happen to know whether the take-off from the intake manifold was from the fuel pressure reg signal line, or is there a better safer place to T in?

Thanks again...

FWIW my 120,000km old turbos let go at 13.5 psi on a very conservative tune. Factory turbo replacement interval is 100,000km and that's standard setup. Get the turbos changed now, the other stuff can wait until whenever you like.

New garrets will cost around $2600 for the pair - no need to go second hand. I'd guess installation would be at least $500, maybe a bit more. Do o2s at the same time, and if you're ever going to do the dumps do it at the same time.

thanks for the tip, that makes sense from looking at the diagram which shows that bleed. Do you happen to know whether the take-off from the intake manifold was from the fuel pressure reg signal line, or is there a better safer place to T in?

Thanks again...

You know that black box in the enginebay on the firewall on the drivers side, thats the MAP sensor that feeds the triple gauge boost reading, I tee'd in there as the pressure source for the PSI reading. You can tee off at the FPR directly, it will technically be less laggy than tee'ing into what I used. The stock MAP sensor gets pressure reading from the FPR anyway, it just enters the balance tube first, and a hose comes out the other end to it, then connects to that black box.

With the engine pressure source (stock one is the bled source), I can't remember if mine is before or after the throttle bodies.

You know that black box in the enginebay on the firewall on the drivers side, thats the MAP sensor that feeds the triple gauge boost reading, I tee'd in there as the pressure source for the PSI reading. You can tee off at the FPR directly, it will technically be less laggy than tee'ing into what I used. The stock MAP sensor gets pressure reading from the FPR anyway, it just enters the balance tube first, and a hose comes out the other end to it, then connects to that black box.

yep that's where I've got the PSI reading too.

With the engine pressure source (stock one is the bled source), I can't remember if mine is before or after the throttle bodies.

so I take it you didn't use the MAP sensor lines or the FPR lines for the solenoid pressure source... but in theory could you? I guess the only post-throttle-body source would be off the balance tube anyway,

My understanding is that the best place for getting the signal for the solenoid is pre-throttle and pre-intercooler if possible, but I assume that would require drilling into the hotpipe - not my preference by a long shot.

That is where my solenoid feed is connected, a small barb threaded into the 'twin turbo' pipe just before the large hose going to the intercooler.. Signal is coming from the same point as the map sensor.

  • 2 months later...

i recently took out my boost restrictor after i fitted my front pipe and high flow cat, and my boost didnt increase after the restrictor was removed !

im still only getting around 11ish psi !

what can be the problem??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, Just want some advice on r34 GTT ac system. Since I’ve owned it, the ac compressor, doesn’t matter the set temperature or ambient temperature, runs for around 10 seconds then disengages the clutch, then re-engages everywhere 30 seconds or so and keeps repeating this.    is this normal?   I had it recharged today as it was slightly low and thought it would fix it but still does it. it cools fine in summer even prior to the recharge, except for the usual warmup when stopped or in traffic (still yet to wire overheat fan to on with ac)   any thoughts would be much appreciated 
    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
×
×
  • Create New...