Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hang on, talking in approximate values here, you can use EITHER a 3076R or a 3071 to get around the same power at similar boost levels? :S

GT2835/GT3071R are more or less the same thing. On a completely stock RB25 up to around 16psi you are unlikely to see much advantage on a GT3076R vs a GT3071R as they have the same turbine flow and the GT3071R's compressor is still fairly efficient up to the mid/high 200rwkw mark. The GT3076R will start shining as boost or flow (ie, doing cams or other such mods which improve your engines efficiency) start going up. Given the spool between the GT3071R and GT3076R is barely different and there is a good 50hp more to be had from the GT3076R I found the GT3076R a better compromise given one can get greedy.

hang on, talking in approximate values here, you can use EITHER a 3076R or a 3071 to get around the same power at similar boost levels? :S

The 3076 will make the same power and is capable of more overall power with less boost than the 3071.

Don't see why everyone is going off on boost levels though as the thread starter seems to be focused on response, so more importantly i think the size of the ass end comes into focus.

As Lithium said u can use the 3076 if u want a little more down the road, but the question i would also love to know the answer for is which one will come into full boost, and be more responsive at the SAME power level?.... a 3071 .82 or the 3076 .63 in original Garrett form

The 3076 will make the same power and is capable of more overall power with less boost than the 3071.

Don't see why everyone is going off on boost levels though as the thread starter seems to be focused on response, so more importantly i think the size of the ass end comes into focus.

As Lithium said u can use the 3076 if u want a little more down the road, but the question i would also love to know the answer for is which one will come into full boost, and be more responsive at the SAME power level?.... a 3071 .82 or the 3076 .63 in original Garrett form

I personally wouldn't bother with a GT3071R with a .82a/r hotside, but since you're asking - I'd say you'd be pretty hard pressed to tell the difference between a .82a/r GT3071R and a .63a/r GT3076R in terms of response. I would like to know how different a GT3071R and a GT3076R with the same hotside would be, even - I am sure there will be a little difference but it can't be a huge amount!

Going from a .63 to a .82a/r housing made my GT30R slightly lazier up to 3000rpm, the rest of the rev range it seems much of a muchness.

Going from a .63 to a .82a/r housing made my GT30R slightly lazier up to 3000rpm, the rest of the rev range it seems much of a muchness.

Were these both Garrett internal gate housings?

How were the off-on boost transition between the two housings?

Was it wheel spin city with the .63 or was it controllable?

Just to throw my 2c in , there is another version of that GT3076R (real one) available and the only difference is that its compressor wheel is 52 trim instead of 56 trim . I had GCG dig me up one and they even tracked down the matching port shrouded compressor housing so all good .

There has been a lot of discussion in the past about GT3071R's and GT3076R's and I think the feeling here has been that the real or uncropped GT3071R while good goes to a point and falls off towards the upper end of the rev range .

HKS are not stupid nor are they rocket scientists but they don't tend to market things that don't get results . In their line up there is no turbo using that GT3071R cartridge and the closest ones have the cropped turbine and offer all three compressor trim sizes , not just the largest or 56 trim 71mm one like Garrett does .

I'm only guessing but it's possible that the full sized 60mm 84 trim GT30 turbine doesn't drive those 71mm compressor wheels as fast as they'd like to be so HKS opted for the cropped turbine to get a bit more shaft speed . When they used these 71mm compressors in RB apps they also tended to use a port shrouded compressor housing so I'd say they were masking too much airflow innitially (smaller turbine) but making strong mid range power and acceptable top end .

What HKS did do was have a 48 compressor trim version of their GT3037 (GT3076R) and their lists show it as having the same airflow capabilities as the GT2835 Pro S - meaning that 71mm compressor in 56 trim with a port shrouded compressor housing . the GT3037 48 trim used a plain or non shrouded comp housing BTW .

I chased and finally bought a 52 trim GT3076R/GT3037 because I'm looking for a little more response than the usual 56T GT3076R and a bit more top end than a GT3071R . I opted for the Garrett GT30 IW housing in 0.82 A/R because I think it's the best trade off for response and power .

Its still in a box because I'm sorting out the Z32 AFM and tuning in the near future .

My engine has a modified head and Poncams so should do good things with this turbo I hope .

Cheers A .

IMO HKS turbos are overpriced given the similarities to the Garrett equivalents nowadays.

+1 i got mine when the dollar was worth 100 odd yen.... i would go garrett if i were to do it these days

Just to throw my 2c in , there is another version of that GT3076R (real one) available and the only difference is that its compressor wheel is 52 trim instead of 56 trim . I had GCG dig me up one and they even tracked down the matching port shrouded compressor housing so all good .

There has been a lot of discussion in the past about GT3071R's and GT3076R's and I think the feeling here has been that the real or uncropped GT3071R while good goes to a point and falls off towards the upper end of the rev range .

HKS are not stupid nor are they rocket scientists but they don't tend to market things that don't get results . In their line up there is no turbo using that GT3071R cartridge and the closest ones have the cropped turbine and offer all three compressor trim sizes , not just the largest or 56 trim 71mm one like Garrett does .

I'm only guessing but it's possible that the full sized 60mm 84 trim GT30 turbine doesn't drive those 71mm compressor wheels as fast as they'd like to be so HKS opted for the cropped turbine to get a bit more shaft speed . When they used these 71mm compressors in RB apps they also tended to use a port shrouded compressor housing so I'd say they were masking too much airflow innitially (smaller turbine) but making strong mid range power and acceptable top end .

What HKS did do was have a 48 compressor trim version of their GT3037 (GT3076R) and their lists show it as having the same airflow capabilities as the GT2835 Pro S - meaning that 71mm compressor in 56 trim with a port shrouded compressor housing . the GT3037 48 trim used a plain or non shrouded comp housing BTW .

I chased and finally bought a 52 trim GT3076R/GT3037 because I'm looking for a little more response than the usual 56T GT3076R and a bit more top end than a GT3071R . I opted for the Garrett GT30 IW housing in 0.82 A/R because I think it's the best trade off for response and power .

Its still in a box because I'm sorting out the Z32 AFM and tuning in the near future .

My engine has a modified head and Poncams so should do good things with this turbo I hope .

Cheers A .

Waiting patiently to see your results.... too bad couldn't see the results of that said turbo on a stock head.

Is this Gt3076r 52 trim available thru Garrett now or was it some thing Gcg put together for u?

Pics?

GCG ordered it through Garrett and it came from Japan as a special order , the cartridge then the compressor housing .

It looks just like any other GT3076R except the compressors inducer is 2mm smaller .

GCG fitted the GT30 IW turbine housing from local stock and I think a one bar large can actuator .

They have the part numbers as they've had that cartridge (center section and wheels) before so it should be still available . Just happens to be the one HKS uses in the GT3037 52T . Same for the comp housing but without the HKS tag and bell mouthed inlet .

Garrett at Chipping Norton may be able to fix you up , I go through GCG because they've been good at findings bits for me that can be hard to source and are closer to me .

Michael at GCG would know what you are after , I'll try to find the part numbers .

Cartridge (CHRA) is 700177-5006 .

A .

I believe it goes like this for a GT3037/GT3076R in 52 compressor trim .

Turbo assembly Pt No . 700382-10

Cartridge number . 700177-5006

Comp Housing No . 436157-0022

Generally I believe Garrett supply all these GT3037/GT3076R units as a cartridge and compressor housing only . The reason being that HKS have their own unique series of turbine housings and if you want a Garrett one you option one of theirs .

PLEASE get any supplier to double check these part numbers as I did when I ordered mine , I don't want to be responsible for someone ordering the wrong bits . I try to be accurate but its a fair wad of cash on the line so you have to get it right . Michael will know for sure .

Hope this helps , cheers Adrian .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...