Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol 300rwkw and a heavy right foot has its drawbacks :D

i get 220km to 3/4 tank, so i'd say 300 to a tank

lol terrible... i have about the same power as you and last tank got 420km.

Before the tune it was doing about 500km per tank, so extra 100kw in the tune and only lost 80km per tank, pretty good.

Averaging 13L/100km over the last 20000kms, track days excluded from calculation.

Babying it day to day though. I can get about 420km per tank before the light comes on. I'm trying my heart out to hit the 500km mark in daily driving without the help of going on long trips via the highway.

Used to get 14-15/100km when I first got the car and it was completely stock except for cat back exhaust. Have to admit that I was in new toy mode though.

Edited by UnCo
lol terrible... i have about the same power as you and last tank got 420km.

Before the tune it was doing about 500km per tank, so extra 100kw in the tune and only lost 80km per tank, pretty good.

yeah mine fails hard cause of stop start driving and the cold start being on for like 50% of the time :D

at my old house it was about the same as yours... and on cruises i get the same as most people with similar power

I get about 400-450 stop start driving.. 500-550 on long trips

cruising around the trip shows around 12L/100KM and cruising on the freeway gets down to about 10 L/100KM

Not to bad for an old RB30E manual :D

Yea... you'd want to get that tune if you're driving a lot. Hahaha. I got 450-500 per tank easy before the tune and after its still 450. But having said that, if I feel like letting it loose a little, it'll drop to 350-400. Still good consumption imo.

Usually between 12.5 to 14.5L/100km

Mods are:

3" turbo back exhuast with high flow CAT

POD

R34 GTT SMIC

Bleed valve set at 10PSI

SAFC-2

Made ~180rwkw when I got it tuned.

Maybe everyone should post up L/100km or km/L instead of full tank. Better way of comparison.

Agreed. Tank is pretty useless because everyone fills up at a different point.

I think going by full tank might be a better representative of the car's overall fuel economy since it will weigh differently when full,1/2 or 1/4 empty.

I am much happier with the consumption I'm getting considering its a GTR though I do miss 500-600km that I got from NA cars.

Nah, not when the term full tank can mean 50 litres or 55 litres!

Best thing to do is fill a tank until full (petrol pump click), reset the trip meter to zero...when the tank is near empty again go fill up at the servo and take note of how many litres it took to fill. Then divide your litres by your km traveled and multiply by 100 for a litres/100km figure.

340awkw i get 200km/tank flat.. no boost..

Shouldnt the car run like a normal car when its not on boost (consumption wise)? That sucks. And thats at 340awkw... I'm curious whats the consumption like for those 1000hp cars... hahaha.

Best thing to do is fill a tank until full (petrol pump click), reset the trip meter to zero...when the tank is near empty again go fill up at the servo and take note of how many litres it took to fill. Then divide your litres by your km traveled and multiply by 100 for a litres/100km figure.

That's what I mean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
    • Assuming your brake pads are not worn right down, I'd add a little brake fluid. Is there any sign of a brake fluid leak?
    • Hello all,  I need of some help. On my drive home my handbrake light lit up and started flashing. When I got home I checked my handbrake sensor under the centre console and nothing seemed out of the ordinary. I have scanned my car via the consult port, no codes shown. Checked my brake fluid as well which is half full. Tried unplugging the brake master but it didn't change anything. Thoughts on what it could be? The master float doesn't seem to be stuck. My car is an 1998 ER34 sedan GT. No hicas but has ABS Photos below 👇🏾 
×
×
  • Create New...