Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A worked motor with fuel economy and low down drivability, I would like to see that.

RB30 twin cam with 9.2-9.4:1 compression and a GT35 on the side of it, happily plods around in traffic at 1500rpm and gives ~12l/100km city driving

low gown driveability and response are the things to cling to for satisfaction when a combo just doesn't cut the numbers. :cool:

thats why we have twin cam forklift engines because you can have your response and 400kw :P

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm interesting topic for sure.

Since head porting is a major part in making big cams work, i think this should be ok to ask in this thread.

I was doing an excel spreadsheet of all the different rb26 head flow numbers i could get my hands on. Some were better than others in the mid range, some a bit better in the top end, to be expected , with differences in machine measurements and job expectations (we don't know they were all for a 'max' flow job etc. Anyhow point is, they were pretty close to each other with nothing HUGE standing out...... EXCEPT ......

Endyne......... and only the exhaust ports..... they were on top in the intake too but only by a small amount. On the exhaust flow results, most topped out at 190 odd cfm ................. there's was around 230+ cfm !!!!!!!!!

Im peeved i seem to have deleted the xlsx spreadsheet else i would post. I guess i could redraw it if anyone was keen to see.

So i'd like to hear from the guru's what they think.

Paul, you being the RS guru, do you have flow numbers for your head please ?

its my understanding that lift and duration have different effects too... duration refers to where in the rev range they are most efficient and increased lift means more airflow at that rpm (which usually means more power)

I've got 260º 10.8mm cams but engine builder reckons he would just go back to standard cams for my car, no real gain to be had in his opinion... but I like the sound lol

im sorry but yours sounds like one of the worst setups i've ever heard of on a rb

You reckon? well according to my tuner my high mounts with the slighty down sized rear housing come on boost the same time as Rs's but only much harder. Anyway, you have no idea about the overall setup i have and how it compliments the remainding engine mods, hence your narrow statement.

All the best Jam; dont sell your Rs's. :P

Lol :) I completley agree with you there. but isnt this guy building a street car...id be willing to sacrifice some top end in a street car for better (in theory) fuel economy and low down drivability.

Hit the nail on the head!!!

Interesting thread, guaranteed to get people fired up!!

I did run 260/9.15 lift poncams with -5's on a built motor, but reverted back to standard cams under instructions from my tuner/mechanic.

One major difference I noticed was pulling into my driveway at home and driving up into the garage (very slight incline). With Poncams my car used to be lethargic. Travelling 10km/h up the driveway my car felt like it needed revs to get into the garage. Once the standard cams were put back in the car it would pretty much idle up the driveway into my garage without a sweat. Now what does this mean? Maybe someone with more technical knowledge than me can explain...

I also felt my on/off boost transition more responsive aswell.

The car made just as much power and similar response (maybe slightly favourable with standard cams) to the Poncams..

Just my 2c.... :O

Step Zero;

Suits Stock turbos or GTSS, 8000rpm.

Quite a rare crank though, id be suprised if there was many more step zero's than kakimoto's or apexi highdecks.

Anyway, here's a PDF from HKS about this kit:

HKS_Step_Zero.pdf

Hit the nail on the head!!!

Interesting thread, guaranteed to get people fired up!!

I did run 260/9.15 lift poncams with -5's on a built motor, but reverted back to standard cams under instructions from my tuner/mechanic.

One major difference I noticed was pulling into my driveway at home and driving up into the garage (very slight incline). With Poncams my car used to be lethargic. Travelling 10km/h up the driveway my car felt like it needed revs to get into the garage. Once the standard cams were put back in the car it would pretty much idle up the driveway into my garage without a sweat. Now what does this mean? Maybe someone with more technical knowledge than me can explain...

I also felt my on/off boost transition more responsive aswell.

The car made just as much power and similar response (maybe slightly favourable with standard cams) to the Poncams..

Just my 2c.... :)

It means that longer duration cams work less well at low rpm.

Here is a rough chart showing the durations of stock versus Poncams. Pretty obvious but I don't know what the lift is on the stock cams.

post-5134-1264052933_thumb.jpg

All the best Jam; dont sell your Rs's. :blush:

I wish you all the best with your setup too, Jamtime, but your step 0 kit is going to be significantly outpowered by the GT-RS's.

Even the crank in the step 1 wouldn't be able to use them to their potential.

Personally I think -5's make a great street turbo, with a 2.8 stroker even better, but not that one.

great thread, been reading other poncam discussions however nothing similar to my setup, rb26 with gt-ss with no headwork but with cam gears, I read -5 guys using the popular 260 9.15mm combo (type b) but not a lot of info with gt-ss

What bout tomei type a which is staggered setup?? Must be of some benefit for smaller turbos.. Type B surely isn't more suitable as it will move the powerband higher.. Is stock cams still best with gt-ss?? Btw car is street driven as a daily

Type A

Duration(IN)- 260°

Duration(EX) - 252°

lift(IN) - 9.15

lift(EX) - 9.15

Type B

Duration(IN) - 260°

Duration(EX) - 260°

lift(IN) - 9.15

lift(EX) - 9.15

Edited by BWRGTR
great thread, been reading other poncam discussions however nothing similar to my setup, rb26 with gt-ss with no headwork but with cam gears, I read -5 guys using the popular 260 9.15mm combo (type b) but not a lot of info with gt-ss

What bout tomei type a which is staggered setup?? Must be of some benefit for smaller turbos.. Type B surely isn't more suitable as it will move the powerband higher.. Is stock cams still best with gt-ss?? Btw car is street driven as a daily

Type A

Duration(IN)- 260°

Duration(EX) - 252°

lift(IN) - 9.15

lift(EX) - 9.15

Type B

Duration(IN) - 260°

Duration(EX) - 260°

lift(IN) - 9.15

lift(EX) - 9.15

A -5/Poncam B combination will put your maximum torque at 5000rpm or higher depending on what boost you run.

The inlet cam on the type A & B is the same cam.

The exhaust cam on the type A is, in duration, very little different to the stock cam, just with higher lift & very slightly less advance.

Curiously I have seen very few people running -5's with the type A's. I really cannot find a good reason not to use this in place of teh type B's.

Also Tomei will sell you inlet cams with a 252, 256, 260, 270, 280 etc etc durations. You can mix & match & don't have to select a type A or a type B set up.

LOL, they sure dont feel like it to drive

Should feel like a turbo diesel compared to RB20 powah. :domokun:

At the end of the day it is a turbo motor & when you start running anything like a sniff of boost (1 bar or better) the peak torque is going to move up the rev range. The issue is, I guess, how to make good torque in the midrange (say 4000rpm) without it dieing in the arse up the top end.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
    • what sort of caliper are they? If they are a slider and you gave everything a good clean, you might need to regrease the pins. My guess though is they will come good after some abuse as suggested above
    • I don't know what you should expect with an LS, but the oil pressure sounds terrible, sorry. As for the brakes, you can get fade from the pads not just the fluid, although generally that feels like a wooden block not doing anything while fluid feels like an oh shit there is no pedal so you can generally tell. What pads are you running front and rear?
    • Went over my datalogs on a whim and noticed a worrying combination of events. High RPM High Temperature Low Oil Pressure Knock Retard I bought some 10w-60 because I actually think this will be better going forward given track temp is 125C and 10-40 will actually be thinner in those environments. I know I had a leak but it's not entirely sure how much pressure loss can be attributed to that. The knock retard does correlate with all of the above. When it's not present oil pressure is higher. And by 'low' I mean at 6800 RPM the oil pressure was recorded as low as ~35psi pretty constantly. Which is obviously very not good. I'm hoping that thicker oil that ISNT LEAKING will result in a bit more pressure when I need it. Also in the last session I got a very spongy break pedal. I bled the lines as the car is on jack stand right now with the wheels off and I noticed... no air in the lines? Maybe the tiniest bit of tiny frothy bubbles for the first 0.1 seconds of bleeding the whole car? The breaks did come back to me after I backed off (and felt fine driving normally). Doesn't appear to be any leaks anywhere that I can see. Any thoughts on that?
    • Solution, run shitter tyres. Let wheel spin be your weak link 😛
×
×
  • Create New...