Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

just updated my firefox to latest, did a full clear of cache etc

still can only use quick reply not full reply

windows7x64 if that helps

Nope I still can't use 3.63 to post in here. When I try I don't get any cursor in the reply field.

Nismoid - Na mate it doesn't show up and it doesn't type. Only way I got to post a new thread was to use the trick that Lum did by inserting centered text and typing in that box so at least there is a sort of work around in place :)

Still nothing on the IPB forums about a possible permanent fix??

Well it doesn't affect everyone :)

I don't have a "cursor", but soon as i click into the text area it appears so i don't see that as a big problem...

The issue some of you have is only for a small group of people so definately a compatability issue with FF & IPB (as im perfectly fine and on the latest builds) :)

Nothing has improved for me, I have another bug now as well, all the reply and quote buttons are no longer pictures, they are just text, a lot of the boxes and highlighting appears to be missing as well.

Really starting to drive me mad, what have the designers of IP Board said about this? Surely we can't be the only website that is having issues.

edit: Actually editing and quoting has magically started working again.

I don't get the cursor appearing randomly when I create a new thread however.

Edited by Rolls

Also what the f**k is this flood control bullshit, this along with the post editing being disallowed are the most retarded features ever, no other website has them and if they do they have reasonable ranges. Eg you can't post within 5 seconds, not 30 and editing is only disabled in the trading forums.

I have another bug now as well, all the reply and quote buttons are no longer pictures, they are just text, a lot of the boxes and highlighting appears to be missing as well.

christian, i also had this issue and i know its fixed but it looks like you broke some other images too full editor/addreply and quick reply. only noticed in the dark skin though. see pics. also i just realised that if you hit edit, there is no option for quick edit. straight to full edit

Also what the f**k is this flood control bullshit, this along with the post editing being disallowed are the most retarded features ever, no other website has them and if they do they have reasonable ranges. Eg you can't post within 5 seconds, not 30 and editing is only disabled in the trading forums.

separate issues to the forum move mate. they've been in place for a while now. once donations are up and running again, you lose the flood control upon donating

post-30915-1270567416_thumb.jpgpost-30915-1270567422_thumb.jpg

post-30915-1270567449_thumb.jpg

Yeah the donations WILL remove the posting/restriction issues.

Currently (ill be brief, ive gone into it plenty of times in more details)... dodgy traders are at an all time low.

I've had i think now 5 complaints in the last 12 months. To me, that is a win regardless of how "annoying" the forums are.

We are restricted by IPB (the old version), and the upgrade to SAU 3.0 will bring with it a lot of enhancements we want to get done.

So rather than abuse and swear at us, when you know the reasons, a little bit of acceptance for the greater good?

If you knew how many hours a week Nick & I spent dealing with bad traders 18+ months ago... it would frighten you.

i'm running firefox 3.59 and i'm missing all the bold, insert image, quote, etc icons like in the pics basti posted. just happened today. just tried cleared firefox cache and didn't fix anything. just changed to light skin and they are all there. changed back to dark skin and they still broken

Yep, will sort that tonight,

I found an interesting "quirk" at the top of the fourms there is a "fourm options" button, only works in 'normal' skin not 'dark' nothing major, just making a note cuz it took me a while to work out where I was going wrong :P

I found an interesting "quirk" at the top of the fourms there is a "fourm options" button, only works in 'normal' skin not 'dark' nothing major, just making a note cuz it took me a while to work out where I was going wrong :P

Hmm, odd. Thanks for pointing it out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...