Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive seen the effects of using less octaned fuel..

ive ran 95 for a couple weeks and didnt notice much difference but decided to run 98 to be safe..

a friend on the other hand, used 91 in his sr20det and after a few weeks had big problems with lag, backfiring, and idling really rough..

why have a performance car if you dont want to look after it? its a price we gotta pay.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

You need to take the cheep fuel out of your tank to get your car going. Skylines cannot have this crap fuel in them unless all the seals in the fuel system have been changed too handle these types of fuel.

The fuel is simply 98octane if the car is set too run stock fuel. What has happened as when you were driving with the cheap fuel in there the seals in the fuel system have swolen up and restricted fuel flow. Thats why you slowly got power loss and when you came too idle the drop in fuel pressure was enough for the fuel supply too cut off and stall the car.

I have seen this exact problem you are describing many times with skylines and a 300zx so i can say go ahead too fix it

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

sorry mate but i never said RON did i? i said octane (not quite the same thing). and if you do a bit of research you will find that the US octane ratings ARE different to ours because we go off the RON rating and america goes off (RON + MON)/2. and since the MON rating is generally about 8 less than the RON rating (but not always), when you add the 2 together and then halve it it comes out about 4 less than the RON rating.

RON = Research Octane Number

MON = Motor Octane Number

as for fuel being cheap in america, that is somewhat true, but you also have to remember that the minimum wage there is about half of what it is here.

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

there isn't anything wrong with E10 fuels. i've been running it for a few years now, in various cars, as have others i know, without any troubles at all. generally people who have trouble with it aren't actually having trouble with the fuel but the cleaning properties that the fuel has and it breaks down a lot of the garbage in the fuel tank or the fuel filter and it gets deposited in the injectors. this is normally in cars where the fuel filter hasn't been replaced for a few years and is probably full of crap and not filtering very well anyway. very few people have had issues caused by the fuel itself.

as for performance of different fuels, there is actually very little difference in the actual fuel as far as how much performance it gives you. where the performance comes into it is from the octane rating, which is how hard it is to ignite. the higher the octane rating, the harder it is to ignite, so the more advanced timing you can run. on most modern cars the engine has knock sensors which register any pinging and then retard the timing to save the engine from damage. so if you run a car on the lower octane fuel that was designed for higher octane fuel on lower octane fuel then the ecu will retard the timing and you will have less power, meaning you have to use more accelerator (and therefore more fuel) to accelerate or even just cruise at a fixed speed. that is how you are able to get better fuel economy from higher octane fuels. but if you take a basic car that is designed to run on basic fuel you often won't see any gains from running higher octane fuels.

as for any damage you may have done, if the knock sensors aren't working properly, or the engine is still getting pinging once the ecu retards the timing then it can damage spark plugs or ringlands.

We do actually use a RON and MON in Australia. It's just in the oil industry we use RON for simplicity. Before our 98 RON was released ,years of blending and dyno work was done to get the MON up to a high level. As you know MON is more of a driveabilty scale than RON. Research Octane Number is a comparison of the Platformate or Reformate [or what process is used in Catalytic Reforming to in crease the octane of the HSR ]to N-Heptene scale. The reformate or platformate leaves the units and goes to a Ben sat unit to remove the benzene down to levels mandated by govts. Heavy runs to tankage at around 102-105 RON and the lights go a reactor for conversion of the benzene. All these streams and other rundowns go to the blend tank for testing of RON and MON before release to the public. I can't go into specifics as the blending is proprietory knowledge. Obviously in Queensland all or nearly all your gaso comes from Caltex Lytton or BP Bulwar . A small amount may be imported .or in times of shortage or production problems from Caltex Kurnell or Shell Clyde. Though you may get some from India or SE Asia.

you are still ignoring the fact that US octane ratings will always be about 4 octane lower than here. it is common knowledge and has been for about the past god knows how many years. the fuel companies may still us MON when testing fuel, however when it comes to saying what octane their fuel is the simple say what RON it is. you may have a good knowledge of australian fuels, but you seem to have little knowledge about other countries octane ratings.

a prime example of this would be any cars shipped to th US designed to run on premium fuels would have dramatically lower power outputs if the US octane was actually only 92 RON for the premium fuel. the manufacturers would have to detune all the cars, and infact all cars, not just cars designed to run on premium would have to be detuned. yet they all seem to have the same power outputs and don't get detuned.

I guess that as this started as an australian fuel thread , australian RON was main thread ,until level ride, came in with north american octane. since they use AKI as their basis of their octane figure . Still mixing the lower and the higher octane together you will get an improvement on the lower one. 50/50 would give a very close to mid range of the difference. Yes their ECU would be retuned for the differing fuel specs over here, though there isn't a great number of american cars coming this way compared to cars from SE Asia who use a rating the same of very close to ours. But back to australian octane per the thread, on our cars with closed loop systems with knock sensors you will get more power from the higher RON and noticable at that. so use the highest RON you can afford. Interestingly , the sales of 95 ron are up due to govt mandating E 10 with the phasing out of 91. I hope I have a passing knowledge of Australian fuels and manufacture as I have been making it for long enough.

  • 3 weeks later...

depends on what mods you have. if your car is completely stock then you could get away with it, but 98 is the better option. if you are running higher boost or aftermarket ecu (that was tuned on 98) then you'll want to stick with 98. unfortunately that is just one of the many ways that owning a turbo import will empty your wallet.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
×
×
  • Create New...