Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

really clutching at straws here

does the car have any whacko-mods? plenum? throttle body? mega coil pack / injector hacks?

try unplugging the afm and see if it starts (long shot)

does the stock ECU have any signs of being tinkered with? remap stickers or crap like that?

where are you located

really clutching at straws here

does the car have any whacko-mods? plenum? throttle body? mega coil pack / injector hacks?

try unplugging the afm and see if it starts (long shot)

does the stock ECU have any signs of being tinkered with? remap stickers or crap like that?

where are you located

Im actually from NZ so duno how many people on here are from nz...i really want to find somone with a r33 like mine and see if itl start that.

Im going to try that now... and my stock ECU has a "G8" sticker on it...doesnt look like its been tinkered with...or is there any other stickers

really clutching at straws here

does the car have any whacko-mods? plenum? throttle body? mega coil pack / injector hacks?

try unplugging the afm and see if it starts (long shot)

does the stock ECU have any signs of being tinkered with? remap stickers or crap like that?

where are you located

Took the afm plug out...and no luck with it starting, i took a closer look at the ecu...its got a slight little faded strip of see through japanese symbols just under and half on the "g8" sticker... dont know what it means or if it could be from somone having played with it or even chipped it? but its so insignificant i doubt its anything to worry about it... But having a chipped ecu wouldnt cause it to not start with the pfc would it?

Oh and is it possible somthing wired up to the ignition or somthing wired up wrong is causing the power fc to not want to start?

Thanks for your help guys

nah even if it was remapped it shouldnt cause it not to start unless it had like mega large injectors and wierd AFM's

just looking for any other clues as to why it wont start

yeah if the ignition is different from standard it could certainly cause it

do you notice anythign different ? mangled turbo timer install etc ?

nah even if it was remapped it shouldnt cause it not to start unless it had like mega large injectors and wierd AFM's

just looking for any other clues as to why it wont start

yeah if the ignition is different from standard it could certainly cause it

do you notice anythign different ? mangled turbo timer install etc ?

Yea...under my steering wheel is a huge mess of wiring...the guy that had the car before me had tapped into all kinds of ignition wires for the boost controller and gauge and turbo timer etc...and whoever did the alarm has done a shocking job...but everything works...but could the power fc be fussy about this?

yeah we have seen where the PFC won't crank over as its more fussy about wires, and the circuit etc

look in the FAQ for ECCS, there's some documentation on the ECCS system and how it needs to be setup

the assumption is your ECCS is fine, as it cranks with the stock ECU, but it might yield some clues and where to look

One of the Stagea guys is having a similar issue with his PFC,

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Is...01#entry5093601

Is your fuel pump operating? Try a direct power feed and see if it is the same issue... Common PFC problem?

i would try the pfc in another car first, i have a pile of dead r33 PFC's here..... it is actually quite common.

I dont think mines just dead...i think its either faulty or its my car...considering the hand controller and its functions work...and well seem to be working??

yip the fuel pump is working...and its just the standard one so i havent messed around with it yet...the sensor check on the hand controller says its working right too....

Im from auckland in NZ so im trying to find somone i know with an r33 that i can try it on...

Would a shop be able to plug it into a laptop and find out the problem inside the pfc if its faulty?

This is a bit of a disaster...

Edited by R33 0wnerrr

Have you checked your plugs?

Installed a V500 in my 33 and spent hours going through the same crap as you, in the end computer was just pumping in too much fuel and fouled (drowned) the sparkies!!! A bit of trim, new plugs and then a good tune, all was good!

Have you checked your plugs?

Installed a V500 in my 33 and spent hours going through the same crap as you, in the end computer was just pumping in too much fuel and fouled (drowned) the sparkies!!! A bit of trim, new plugs and then a good tune, all was good!

Really? ill check them today...hope its somthing simple like that... fingers crossed!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...