Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, im looking to buy a new car around the 7k price range and im looking at the following cars to buy

r32, 180sx or 300zx

turbo of course, i have had an r33 and i loved it, has anyone driven all these cars? or have driven an r33 and either one of these cars? id like to know which is the best buy, aka, the 300zx is probably the fastest, but it might not drive as smoothly or handle as well as a 180.

i havnt driven any of the above, so if someone could tell me a bit about their experience with their car, that would be great!

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308136-r32-180sx-or-300zx/
Share on other sites

have owned a 33 and a 180, and been in a 32, and know someone with a 300zx.

if i was owning another import it would be the 33 or the 180sx. never been much of a fan of the 32, and they and the 300zx are the slowest of the group. also getting a bit long in the tooth these days.

also if you like working on cars and plan on doing mods yourself, forget the 300zx. for a reason why, google a pic of the engine bay. it is another reason why they are the slowest. most of them will weigh about 300kg more than when they came out of the factory because there are dozens of tools somewhere in the engine bay that hav been dropped by people working on them that they were never able to find or retrieve because of the lack of space.

ok, well i sold my 33 a long time ago, but i realy enjoyed it, im swaying toward the 180 because i want something light that you can throw around, plus its going to be my dailey, so i think the 300s are out of my choices, so that leaves me with either a 180 or a 32, and i think the 180s are a bit better looking (imo) unless ofcourse i find a cheap 33 somewhere lol, in that case i would just get a 33!

cheers guys

The 300ZX can be ruled out, good luck finding someone to work on it! I know many mechanics who refuse to touch them.

The 32 and 180 are very similar, and are both very chuckable. The 32 has more power and torque, but the 180 is lighter. Finding a 32 that hasnt be molested is easier though...

hey guys, im looking to buy a new car around the 7k price range and im looking at the following cars to buy

r32, 180sx or 300zx

turbo of course, i have had an r33 and i loved it, has anyone driven all these cars? or have driven an r33 and either one of these cars? id like to know which is the best buy, aka, the 300zx is probably the fastest, but it might not drive as smoothly or handle as well as a 180.

i havnt driven any of the above, so if someone could tell me a bit about their experience with their car, that would be great!

cheers

I've owned 2 out of 3 (zx and current gtr), friend has a nice 180sx.

The 300zx IMO is the best looking, it sits lower and the looks last longer than the other 2.  The age group at aus300zx is a bit older than SAU so the cars are probably more likely to have been "loved" more (arguably lol).  Has the most cramp engine bay I've ever seen, but a worked engine is a very worthy project if you put some time into it.  I'm still a fan and would consider getting another Z again only if it has an RB26DETT.

180sx is the baby brother, probably easier to work on and is cheaper.  More of a younger person's car but looks older than the ZX.  Was never really interested in it even when I was your age but have seen a few nice ones around.

I can only speak about the R32 GTR.  Compared to my ZX it feels less of a sports car, more like a muscle car.  Its not a graceful car like the ZX, just a menace of lurking power and authority.  I can't think of any other car for the price they are selling on the market today.

The 300ZX can be ruled out, good luck finding someone to work on it! I know many mechanics who refuse to touch them.

The 32 and 180 are very similar, and are both very chuckable. The 32 has more power and torque, but the 180 is lighter. Finding a 32 that hasnt be molested is easier though...

has more power yes, but the sr20 has more torque.

and as you pointed out, the 180sx is lighter, so in standard form it will be as quick as a 33, which is faster than the 32 (close to 1/2 a second faster over the 1/4 mile)

So much 300ZX hate... :thumbsup:

*Waits for 300ZX guys to come into discussion*

But I'd either pic a R32 or 180SX over the 300ZX as I would go for a 240Z / 260Z / 280ZX.

S Chassis (180SX / S13 / S14 / S15's) are fun to drive, due to it being a light car, has the power and can be tail happy.

I'd been in a few 180SX with about 250+ kW's = fcuken mad and I drove a S15, fun in the wet and easy car to drive.

R32 GTS-T, just adds to the fun with the extra 2 cylinders but have only been in one as I already drive a R32 GTR.

I'd guess it comes down to what car your prefer the look of, or what characteristics of both cars you like and choose.

i always wanted a 300 until i found out how hard they are to work on. ie little things to do on the 180/32 could be major work on the 300. check out aus300zx.com.

i had a 180 and while it was good they are tiny inside, backseat is a joke. the 32 is much roomier.

the 180/s13 has a very boring bland plastic tacky dash as well. Also they are 4stud stock limiting wheel choice unless you go 5stud which is like 1k.

Sr20 mods are cheap tho. but going to my 33 after the 180 i would ever go back.

Really the best thing to do is drive them all.

cheers rich

As people have said 300's are very difficult to work on. The engine bay is so tight! And they can be problematic... buying one for $7k would be buying a lot of headaches.

180's were sold at same time as the 32 and were the cheaper car. Interior is not as nice (imo), 4 stud limits rim choice and although the sr20 is a solid engine they dont sound near as good as an rb. But either a 32 or 180 would be ok... its really personal preference

Edit: Just realised most of the points I just raised are the same as 1802NV above, ah well seems to be a similiar view throughout this thread

Edited by r32line
has more power yes, but the sr20 has more torque.

but it gets muddier...

best info I could find (someone correct me if this is wrong)

180SX:

153kw @ 6000rpm

274N-m @ 4000rpm

R32 GTST:

158kw @ 6400rpm

264N-m @ 3200rpm

The sr20 has more PEAK torque but reaches it 800rpm later. Due to the configuration of the RB engine, it will not only rev faster than the SR, but will reach its peak torque at lower revs too.

In a turbo car, peak torque is generally where the turbo reaches max boost. I believe they both run 6psi (could be wrong) so basically the R32 will spool faster.

The 180sx is lighter, which may be the one thing that gives it a performance edge.

However, from comments I've heard over the years, the R32 is a much better built car (in general). I have owned 2 S13 silvias and yes the tail does step out rather easily - particularly in the wet. I would own another one though - they're a lot of fun. Never driven a R32 so cant really comment on them beyond figures and theory.

yes the rb20 hits peak torque lower, but that doesn't mean that the sr20 wouldn't be making similar torque at the same RPM. also this is most likely due to the rb running a ball bearing turbo and the sr a bush bearing turbo.

but once you take into account the approx 100kg weight advantage the s13 has, that is why the s13 is nearly half a second quicker over the 1/4.

So much 300ZX hate... :/

*Waits for 300ZX guys to come into discussion*

But I'd either pic a R32 or 180SX over the 300ZX as I would go for a 240Z / 260Z / 280ZX.

I'd guess it comes down to what car your prefer the look of, or what characteristics of both cars you like and choose.

You would take the 280zx over the 300zx (Z32 I presume)???

There is a bit of 300zx hate because some people have either bad or no experiences with them.  I know guys who've had the same car for more than 8 years already!

Z32s are IMO the best looking Nissans and the TTs are no slouch.  They are solid cars when done right, as with any other turboed cars and far more reliable than RX7s.  I drove a mate's ZX that was stage 7 or 8.  No other car scared me more to this day but it was still very well grounded and handling was amazing.  I think he did a bit of suspension work to put all that power to the ground as ZXs are notoriously bad drag cars.

I have a feeling the OP would probably settle for a sedan-like car. ZXs are more for enthusiasts and weekend riders.

You would take the 280zx over the 300zx (Z32 I presume)???

There is a bit of 300zx hate because some people have either bad or no experiences with them.  I know guys who've had the same car for more than 8 years already!

Z32s are IMO the best looking Nissans and the TTs are no slouch.  They are solid cars when done right, as with any other turboed cars and far more reliable than RX7s.  I drove a mate's ZX that was stage 7 or 8.  No other car scared me more to this day but it was still very well grounded and handling was amazing.  I think he did a bit of suspension work to put all that power to the ground as ZXs are notoriously bad drag cars.

I have a feeling the OP would probably settle for a sedan-like car. ZXs are more for enthusiasts and weekend riders.

Yeah man!

My dad had a 260ZX, sold it, then wanted another one but could only find a 280ZX at the time.

Would have wanted to go 260ZX or 240Z if they popped up at the time.

Our 280ZX was rebuilt and tuned by Z-Shop.

Great fun too.

maybe he meant the best looking zed. but that's not true either lol

coz then you have the 240z and 350z, which are both better looking.

dont get me wrong. i love the zeds. almost bought a z32. but i just wasnt commited enough to deal with the maintenance. plus theyre heavy fkrs, and very thirsty when you drive them hard.

plus ive seen old ladies driving them around :rofl:

no shit!

Edited by Munkyb0y

Personal feedback from driving them. They are very unresponsive in the steering and require a lot of turning of the wheel to actually turn them. Example going straight on a roundabout requires nearly a full turn to one side of the wheel unlike most cars requiring just a flick. They feel very heavy (heavier than a supra which most people on here call heavy) into corners and honestly while having good torque the power delivery doesn't feel that great even on a mildly modified one. They are a bit of a noisy car through the body (rear boot/hatch can have quite the annoying rattle to it), this would obviously be an age issue. Obviously you can make any car great with a large budget. But for the most things people modify on cars (exhaust, cooler, tune, coilovers etc) they just don't seem to feel that great when other cars are out there for the same coin.

For the OP's choices of cars and from what he has described what he wants, the 300ZX i just don't think would suit. Each to their own.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
    • If you are Ecutek tuned then these TCU tunes are anywhere from $550 to $700 usd. If you are not ECUTEK tuned, then it gets costly!    
    • Sorry to hear your HFM BM57 was faulty,  did you contact HFM I would hope they would be at least grateful for the information if there was some sort of manufacturing fault, you would hope they would be sympathetic even if your item was 2 years old if it had never been fitted. May I ask where it leaked from ?
×
×
  • Create New...