Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys im ordering a set of xd9s for my gtst

18x9 +30 and 18x10 +38

ive got gtr front guards so i no the front has no problem sticking out

but im just worried that the rears are going to be sticking out of the car

too much...

is 10 inch for a gtst too much?

my other alternative is to get my guards rolled add camber so it look like its stil under the guards

cheers everyone

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/309783-work-emotion-on-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

They wont stick out at all, you'll find that they will both be way inside the guards.

If you get 18x10 +18 for the rear it will be a perfect fit, you will just need the rear guards rolled. As for the front you have GTR guards so im not quiet sure what they will fit?

They wont stick out at all, you'll find that they will both be way inside the guards.

If you get 18x10 +18 for the rear it will be a perfect fit, you will just need the rear guards rolled. As for the front you have GTR guards so im not quiet sure what they will fit?

yeh with gtr guards you'll want +18 on the front but all same size on gtst duno about that..

disclaimer: flame all you want about my weak offset or wrong tyre choices or w/e. i dont mind im jsut giving old mate some info:

i have CR kais, 18x9.5 +38 front and rear. I fit a 275/35 on the back with rolled guards and 2.2degrees neg camber

fronts i have a 10mm spacer cos the spokes didnt clear standard gts-t brakes, tyre is 245/40 with 1.5ish degrees neg camber and no guard mods (gts-t guards). lowered to sit about ~1cm between guard and tyres all round and its just touching the corner of the front tyres, any of a A:very light roll or B:halfa degree of camber or C: a 235tyre would all sort that easy imo.

my 2c

-Sean

edit: just to be bleedingly obvious NO that isnt them in my sig pic :P

Ohh ok sweet :blush: the only

offsets I can get from work is 30 fronts 38 rears

or +18 all round but the + 18 is 2240 with out tires the +30s are 2500 with federals

all round I think I made my mind up :D

Ohh ok sweet :) the only

offsets I can get from work is 30 fronts 38 rears

or +18 all round but the + 18 is 2240 with out tires the +30s are 2500 with federals

all round I think I made my mind up :)

that is the most ridiculous thing i think ive ever read..

its cheaper but will look like shit so ill buy it? :down:

give ya a free tip its cheaper cos its no good you get what you pay for remember.. 18x9 +30 on GTR guards is a really bad idea man you'll regret it straight away go +18 just hunt out second hand with tyres if budget is a concern or save up more.. take advice from billy :)

Just to be sure lol but you know what

because of what you guys said I've decided

so ditch the cheap pair and buy the more expensive ones

with the better offsets :)

so now I'm looking at 18x9 +20 , 18x10+18

or

18x10 +18 allround

and I want to be scraping at wheel lock or when I have full load

so I'm leaning towards the 18x9 at the front

does that sound better everyone!!! Lol

now just need help with tires

alr33x dude I'm listing to you lol

ask billy re tyres but i think he runs a 245 on the 10s on the 9s you could go a 225 which isnt much stretch at all, i dont think you would scrub on full lock with the 10s gtr guards are huge my arches only cop a belting cos it sits lowif i raised it 10mm or shaved the inner lip of fibreglass would have no issues

id still say the 10s will be a nicer fit with gtr guards..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...