Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 4-door - Transplanting Gt-r Rear Seats

Sarumatix

By Sarumatix,
in Four Door Family & Wagoneers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Sarumatix Veteran

Sarumatix

Posted
Posted

SO I had a shot at putting GT-R rear seats into my 4-door 32. The fitment looks ok, but is definitely 1 inch narrower than the 4-door items.One problem I have found however is that the back section is slightly shorter than the 4-door version. Has anyone else encountered this because as far as I knew they were the same height :S.

In terms of comfort the GT-R ones are so much better so i'd really like to get them in :(.

Dan_J Veteran

Dan_J

Posted
Posted

they shud fit if u bring a hammer out? or are they fitted and you just want them to look better?

i had a spare set of r32 2 dr rear seats and i fitted them to the cefiro by getting the grinder out and trimming some of the metal links so that u cud move the metal part that bolts in.

p.s r32 2dr rear seats dont suit ceffy's well, their not wide enough and are shorter

BstewyR33 Community Regular

BstewyR33

Posted
Posted

this is taken from a tech article of seat inter-change-ability from NS.com

SKYLINES R32 R33 R34 GTS GTS-T GT-T & GTR

It is 100% fact that all skyline coupe & sedan front seats are interchangeable from 1988-2004(or when ever the last r34 was made)

the front seats of the skyline sedans are all interchangeable the rears are model specific. and you CANNOT put skyline coupe seats into a skyline sedan they are much narrower and the back rest is alot shorter in the coupes!

  • Like 1
iseekool Veteran

iseekool

Posted
Posted
this is taken from a tech article of seat inter-change-ability from NS.com

SKYLINES R32 R33 R34 GTS GTS-T GT-T & GTR

It is 100% fact that all skyline coupe & sedan front seats are interchangeable from 1988-2004(or when ever the last r34 was made)

the front seats of the skyline sedans are all interchangeable the rears are model specific. and you CANNOT put skyline coupe seats into a skyline sedan they are much narrower and the back rest is alot shorter in the coupes!

I read somewhere on SAU that the R34 series (excluding the R34 GT-R have) have different seats.

BstewyR33 Community Regular

BstewyR33

Posted
Posted
Hmm that goes against what I was told previously but confirms my findings.. Dang.

i've heard they are only short by the smallist bit, however it is noticeable, depends on how picky you are with those sorts of things.

I read somewhere on SAU that the R34 series (excluding the R34 GT-R have) have different seats.

i dont get what your trying to say, they may have different seats but going by the tech article they can all be swapped over with each other.

Sarumatix Veteran

Sarumatix

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The width doesn't bother me.. it really isn't much I think I measure 1 inch on each side. The height is the problem because it doesn't appear to 'seat' properly. It could be that my seat is slightly damage though which is why I bothered to ask :(. The bottom piece fits perfectly.

  • 2 weeks later...
Habler Rising Star

Habler

Posted
Posted (edited)
i dont get what your trying to say, they may have different seats but going by the tech article they can all be swapped over with each other.

What he is trying to say is that R34 front seats are not interchangeable with previous models (33, 32). I think the article may just be referring to R34 sedan fronts and R34 coupe fronts being changeable with each other but it reads a bit confusing.

Edited by Habler
  • 10 months later...
r32silvergts Enthusiast

r32silvergts

Posted
Posted

had same problem puting mspec interior into 4 door r32 so i just moved the fixings up 1 inch so the back part clips in right, and the seat part just sits up at the back .would never notice but it does have 1 inch gap either side.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • GTSBoy
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • Murray_Calavera
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...