Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A little? lol... A LOT!

I just wish I new where to start, it's got everything it needs to make a decent number, but it's knock restricted.

When jez tuned it last the exhuast was way to small, now that I've got a bigger system coming from jap and I made some 3inch tuned length front pipes into a 4inch merge. The exhuast issues should b over, so it's back to jezza's shop to c if there's any gains.

Strange thing is, I had a 4inch system made, and we chucked it on the dyno, only got 7kw gain with adding timing and boost.

C what happens, maybe we need to play with the cams, or something.

Depends what manifold you get.. The Full race one I have was designed for fitment on 33/34s. Tried putting it on my 32 and the compressor fouled on it..apparently full race have rectified this for 32s now

A/C didn't work anyway so I'm not too fussed, then again I may have wanted to fix it one day :s

I saw a dyno graph from a famous 32 on the weekend. It's now running a Precision single (6766 I think he said). The Precision shits allover the -5's for response on the graph, and from his times, on the track too! The 32 is still 2.6 as well so these turbos are obviously a good thing!

Correct! and yes WOW! it has me thinking the EFR's are on their last chance... :yes:

I've already emailed him to find out exactly what version he has on the 32.

The 34 is running one also, however he likes the one on the 32 better.

One thing he did say to me was to buy bigger than I think I'll need and I won't be disappointed, they are that good.

I would choose a Precision over an EFR any day. . .too much hype with the BW's. . .too many results to look away from Precision. . .sorry, but a 2-year wait on an EFR is ridiculous. . .

bri73y.. .do you have a chart for that r32 running the 6766? I'm running this on my FD. . .sounds too good to be true that it would shit on the -5's. . .

I would choose a Precision over an EFR any day. . .too much hype with the BW's. . .too many results to look away from Precision. . .sorry, but a 2-year wait on an EFR is ridiculous. . .

bri73y.. .do you have a chart for that r32 running the 6766? I'm running this on my FD. . .sounds too good to be true that it would shit on the -5's. . .

No sorry, it's not my car, although it has lived in my garage for a while previously. Damn should've stolen bits off it when I had a chance.... :whistling:

Correct! and yes WOW! it has me thinking the EFR's are on their last chance... :yes:

I've already emailed him to find out exactly what version he has on the 32.

The 34 is running one also, however he likes the one on the 32 better.

One thing he did say to me was to buy bigger than I think I'll need and I won't be disappointed, they are that good.

Any email back? The one on the 34 did look a little bigger but by how much I couldn't say. I'd love to know!

What do you think you will order for your car John? 6466?

Depends what manifold you get.. The Full race one I have was designed for fitment on 33/34s. Tried putting it on my 32 and the compressor fouled on it..apparently full race have rectified this for 32s now

A/C didn't work anyway so I'm not too fussed, then again I may have wanted to fix it one day :s

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Race Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a good manifold and probably a Precision..

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Edited by tricstar

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a 6boost and unplumbing the gate.

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Fixed, no need for new turbo :)

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Well it made 436 on a 2.3 SR with 24-25 lbs of boost on the same dyno as i made 425 with -5's. It beat my setup low end and pipped me up top. I'd love to see what it would make with 30 psi!

If the 6466 is too big just rip it off and drop back 1 size. Little touch up and away we go!

Hey Joe, or anyone for that matter..

Is there any evidence that the Full Race Manifold is worth the cost vs 6boost & ETM etc being about double the $ ??

Will wait and see how Piggaz's turns out, as I also have a 2.8, been running a TO4Z for a couple of years on stainless china manifold, time to get with the times, with a good manifold and probably a Precision..

wouldn't the one Jez is running, with 30+ psi on a 2.8L with cams etc see 450-500rwkw ? with awesome responce .

Honestly mate don't know if the full race is better or not. Would need to do some back to back testing which would be a real pain in the ass as you would need to plumb up 2 different sets of gates.

If I had my time again I would probably just bought a 6 boost one for reasons such as

1. Cheaper

2. Quicker to obtain (each fullrace manifold is made On order)

3. If it cracked or failed in anyway would be easier for warranty

4. The full race is a bit of a nightmare plumbing wise.

Though I do like how the manifold looks and how it makes the turbo sit towards the front of the car.

I also had to cut a bit of the re enforcement out of my bonnet to fit the Massive frame of the BW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...