Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have seen dyno sheets floating around which are probably in this post somewhere anyway - which show the difference in the response between, 6266, 6466,6766 being about 500rpm on a 3.4L ...

I have even emailed precision directly who have confirmed that it would be about 300-500rpm on a 3L

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Thanks. Have seen it but not sure on that one. I think the 6262 is the one.

Yeah just give it a ago they are pretty interchangable apparently.

I went for the 6466 as I figure if worst case it was 600-700 difference in response from the 62-64 - something i doubt im really going to notice when its on an engine which will snap the rpm needle within a matter of seconds anyway - which is worth it considering the top end gains!

  • 2 weeks later...

Is anyone running a 6266? How much lag are we talking about between the 6262 and the 6266? Can't decide on what to go for. If the RPM difference is negligble i'd be more inclined to go with the 6266 for the potential to make more power at a later date. (Both turbos with 0.84 Twin scroll)

Looking to make 400kw on a RB26 with all the basic mods. Will a 6262 make that power on 98pump fuel (say no more than 25psi)? I've seen that SimonR32 made 420 but that was on flexfuel.

Edited by RRP1

I actually made 450kw and trust me there is plenty more in it but I ran out of fuel pump.

I wouldnt be suprised to see another 30-40kw if I ran 25psi but as you said that is on e85.

6262 is a nice balance for decent power and not too much lag. I was tossing up between it and the 6266 and went the smaller. I think I made the right decision

Edited by SimonR32

no probs....i dont think there will be too much difference to be honest but i cant find the wheel sizes for the 6266

6262 is as below tho

Compressor-

Wheel Inducer: 62mm

Wheel Exducer: 82mm

Turbine Wheel -

Wheel Inducer: 72mm

Wheel Exducer: 62mm

i think i did read that the exducer of the 66 was slightly bigger but dont quote me

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

Edited by RRP1

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

PTE 6466 - for anyone looking at this turbo.

Compressor Wheel 2.535" (64.39mm) inducer / 3.410" (86.61mm) exducer

Turbine Wheel 2.920" (74.17mm) inducer / 2.600" (66.00mm) exduce

HKS T04Z:

Compressor Wheel:

T04R/T04Z, Inducer 66.7mm, Exducer 84mm.

Turbine:

T04 P trim, Inducer 74.2mm, Exducer 64.6mm

Garrett GT3540R/GT3582R/GT35R:

Compressor Wheel:

56 trim GT40, Inducer 61.2mm, Exducer 82mm.

Turbine:

84 trim GT35, Inducer 68mm, Exducer 62mm,

for comparison..

Alot of guys are running the 6466 in favour of the 6266 in the states and report no change in spool/response but more power up top.. Would like to see some results on RB26 though.

6466 only comes in ball bearing tho which is all good but cant justify the extra cash for it

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

i dont think you can go wrong the PTE to be honest

So how do people reckon a PT6466 would compare with a Garrett T04Z in overall performance? Would you be able to use the Precision in the Garrett's place and expect to make similar (or better) power on pump gas on a suitably built engine?

Should make plenty more power without being too much laggier from what I have seen

Thats interesting, I'd have hoped for it to be at least as responsive!

Well my 6262 is better than my old T04Z but not the miracle that some would lead you to believe. The 6466 is a fair wack bigger (195hp rated), I doubt you would be getting that for nothing :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...