Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL Simon, that car is fast. Sky is also blue, but I just wanted to say it.

How do you get your freaking helmet to fit? Im only 180cm and a helmet like yours in my S14 does nothing but trade colour schemes with my hood lining.

Is the Bride mounted super low or your shorter than me or what? It shits me to tears, I need to lay my seat back heaps and slide around like a moron at the track lol

haha

Response wise the 6262 really impressed me over the weekend. Did lots of roll ons from 60km/hr (just under 4000rpm in 2nd gear) and every time it was cracking gate almost instantly on 100% throttle application.

Check out this run with an XR6 Turbo that runs a 11.9 at 120mph at the drags. I hit the throttle at the big bollards and it is straight on gate (24psi)

Is it me or are these Precision turbo's very quiet on song? Every video I have seen they are quiet as!

Bulldog run Simon. Congrats :D

The mid frames hardly make any noise, when you're cruising they make a multi-pitched noise though, you can notice it at night.

The larger frames like my 7175 "almost" sounds like a T51R.

What power was the r32 it making in this video?

It was making 600hp on a hub dyno, we tried to tune it on a roller with about 4psi more boost but it just wheelspun at 560rwhp,

Best guess would be 650hp at the wheels

Edited by SimonR32

Here's an update for the RB26 VN at the track. Still a bit off its potential on this power (910hp at the wheels on 25 psi), but it's getting there! Weighs 3315lb with driver, has steel, glass and a heavy interior.

I'm sure you'll enjoy the sound.

Here's an update for the RB26 VN at the track. Still a bit off its potential on this power (910hp at the wheels on 25 psi), but it's getting there! Weighs 3315lb with driver, has steel, glass and a heavy interior.

I'm sure you'll enjoy the sound.

Would weigh 3314lb after losing that side skirt at the start.

Amazing machine

Here is an insane result for an RB26, I can't get my head around the spool and power this thing has made - a mild built (no porting, not extreme cams) RB26 with nearly 500kw @ hubs/665hp @ hubs with excellent spool on a PT6266 BB:

7585d1365685752-nats-r32-gtr-map1.jpg

Thread:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/166866-nats-r32-gtr-3.html#post1762728

Raises some eyebrows to say the least.


Things to consider, it's on SAE correction on old software so I would say it's around 600rwhp on a roller (but that's on normal fuel not E85)

You have to wonder how long the ramp rate is, 350hp at 4000rpm is about double what I would be expecting from that turbo

Edited by SimonR32

They are certainly capable of pushing beyond their power rating, but I've seen some figures floating around with way too much GST on them.

If they aren't done on an engine dyno or backed up on a track, they are just that...numbers.

They are certainly capable of pushing beyond their power rating, but I've seen some figures floating around with way too much GST on them.

If they aren't done on an engine dyno or backed up on a track, they are just that...numbers.

No doubt, mine isn't getting pushed at all and it's starting to get right up there power vs power rating wise.

I just find it hard to imagine a larger turbo on basically the same motor set up as mine and Jez's is making almost double the power at 4000rpm and a huge extra wack of hp top end all while using 99 Octane fuel not E85

If I thought that graph was genuine and repeatable I would have already sent an email requesting an invoice for the purchase :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...