Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so many options

want to see full boost by 4,000 rpm - but not die out by 8500rpm

tried searching each one specifically for a 2.8 but no dice

What boost/power level? You might need something a bit fancier than a Precision if you want that combination

Update guys, The Old girl made 350kw 15 psi 430kw 24psi, 30psi made 436kw @ 6000rpm ignition prob the splitfires arent coping plus Im thinking the exhaust maybe holding it back 3.5 inch dump pipe 3.0 inch exhaust maybe to much back pressure we will check & see whats going on. Should be up around 500 plus in my eyes gate is vented straight out with screamer pipe. Need to iron out the little bugs then hopfully see some decent numbers.

Sorry which turbo and what motor? Thanks.

I'm deciding between a 6262 or a 6266 for a SR22VET circuit car.

The 6262 should make 450rwk but may struggle to hit 500rwk whereas the 6266 might hit the 500rwk but be approx 250-500rpm slower in spool. Boost levels would be around 24-30psi.

Should be a similar story for most, so you just have to decide what is more important. Outright response or a few extra kw up top?

I'm leaning for a few extra kw up top because you can never have enough power! and your tuner can always play around with cam timing to bring it on a bit earlier if need be. For the 6466 add another 30rwk or so and add another say 300rpm, and so on for each turbo thereafter.

Edited by SRS13

I'm deciding between a 6262 or a 6266 for a SR22VET circuit car.

The 6262 should make 450rwk but may struggle to hit 500rwk whereas the 6266 might hit the 500rwk but be approx 250-500rpm slower in spool. Boost levels would be around 24-30psi.

Should be a similar story for most, so you just have to decide what is more important. Outright response or a few extra kw up top?

I'm leaning for a few extra kw up top because you can never have enough power! and your tuner can always play around with cam timing to bring it on a bit earlier if need be. For the 6466 add another 30rwk or so and add another say 300rpm, and so on for each turbo thereafter.

With 450rwkw an extra 50kw isn't really going to help, you're going to be going from wheelspin to even more wheelspin.... I would just go the 6262!

Yes of course but 295 all around and decent aero should help with that.

However I doubt I would run that on the circuit at all but I might use it on the drag strip or runway... and if it only costs me 300rpm or so I am seriously considering it.

RB26 built big cams 6766 e85 see sig under post

Thanks. Can't see the sig on the phone. Yeah should make a lot more than that - 500rwk easy depending on boost level.

Mates old set up made 536rwk on 34psi with a 6466 T4 twin scroll 0.84 on a 2.0 SR20VE on the JEM dyno.

Thanks. Can't see the sig on the phone. Yeah should make a lot more than that - 500rwk easy depending on boost level.

Mates old set up made 536rwk on 34psi with a 6466 T4 twin scroll 0.84 on a 2.0 SR20VE on the JEM dyno.

Here is his sig -

R32 GTR n1 block Mahle pistons, Eagle rods, Supertech Valves, 280 cams 11.5mm lift Hypertune plenum, Ported Head, 6766 CEA BB Precision Turbo just fitted, Awaiting Tune, 35psi & E85 up its gutz & see what happens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...