Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6466 + stroker = loves it. Ignition breaking down over 29 pounds so this was the limit. I think it will do for now. :)

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Well had the exhaust done, did not pick up much power but it helped where I wanted it, response.

since I changed the Turbo,Cams and Exhaust the car has gone from a pig to drive to being fun, enough up top and good bottom response,street drive :)

Here is the latest Dyno

New Dyno 345.4 KW

Red = Boost off

Blue = Low Boost

Orange = High Boost

Old T78 = 337.9KW

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Epic result Mitch must be an animal?

That on a 3.4L?

Is it in an R?

She's a beast on the road, i love it more and more each time I drive it.. Yep 3.4L kit in my R34 GTT.

What's redline on this?

Looks like it will want to break things. Lots.

I want one.

Upped the limiter to 8000 now. Peak power is at around 7400. The whole driveline has been upgraded so here's to hoping it doesn't break anything!

  • 1 month later...

That is a significant different there in where peak torque is made, good job.

Poor old T78 :) Did you end up getting my PM?

Hi Micheal

Sold the T78 and the bloke is happy, crap it was just about new, well 5 years ago and only 3000Klms on the car since it was installed

No I did not get your PM as it would come in on this Laptop, it does not allow me to gain access to anything other than threads and posts, but better than nothing. If you would like get me as TT350GT I can access everything on my PC.

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it.

I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

post-134126-0-12817500-1404283972_thumb.jpg

post-134126-0-39452800-1404284021_thumb.jpg

I have caught the Mod bug and going to have the RB30/Nitto 3.2 Stroker kit shoved into it, keeping the PT6262 may get a bigger back housing and go for response, it is a DD and I want it to be what I thought it was when I bought it. I have to say that since the last modifications I got to love it but need more and might have to come out of retirement to pay for it,bloody cars ,haha

Haha, that's great :D can't wait to see how it turns out!

  • 2 months later...

does anyone know if precision will release a gen 2 6766 or a tubo slightly bigger than a 67 but still retain twin scroll, as anything larger than a 67 seems to be only able to be bought with a single entry rear housing.

7175? Or FP Super94 :P

  • 2 months later...

OK so the Precision PT6870 CEA is out now - from the initial testing it is serious serious serious business, ultra impressive.

See here: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/showthread.php?859938-PTE-6870-CEA-GEN2-Test-Results-by-Sound-Performance

PT7275 versus PT6870 (all testing on the same engine setup):

7275div981010whpvs6870811059whp_zps5ba3a

PT6766 versus PT6870

676681949whpvs6870811059whp_zpsb7426611.

Spool comparison:

PT6870SpoolComparison_zpsa6432d6b.jpg

Those dyno results are all "max effort" on a good motor and high ethanol percentages, so likely to do them all justice. The spool and the relative power versus the 6766 and 7275 impress the hell out of me, nuts.

Yep, quite interesting. All results were impressive, though that particularly made me think of the GTX3067R result someone on here got.

Not sure if referring to my GTX3067 result, or typo, but nonetheless also found the results of 0.81 v 0.96 very interesting.

Below quote from the original page in particular:

The .96 A/R only added lag and if you reference the boost spool comparison below, we also weren't able to see as much boost with the duty cycle all-in. This tells us that we were at a limitation of the compressor wheel flow itself and not because of back pressure.

Not always beneficial to go larger A/R it seems.

Anyways, sorry to digress from subject of thread. Thanks Lithium for posting above info.

Keen to max out a 6870! Hopefully they release divided housings for them sometime soon. Certainly looks good on paper, gotta love those GST yankee figures as always :)

6766 rated to 935hp, makes 949hp atw.

Yeah those numbers seemed high for a 6766 on a Mustang, though I am still shocked that people are taking hp ratings as some kind of gospel. How much did you make atw on your old GT3076R? And what are GT3076Rs rated at?

The 6870 is certainly looking the goods, no matter how you slice it. Would have loved to have seen FPs Super94/99s on more things - they are in T4 twin scroll and imho until this came along the best thing since sliced bread for the ">6766 power without going BIG frame".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
    • what sort of caliper are they? If they are a slider and you gave everything a good clean, you might need to regrease the pins. My guess though is they will come good after some abuse as suggested above
×
×
  • Create New...