Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just out of curiosity i went on the intrawebs to look for an r34 rb26dett half cut or just the engine. I cant find any understandably (←is that right?) because well you dont see many r34 gtrs at the wreckers BUT i did see a few r32 RB26's so my question is, whats the difference between the 3?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/315538-whats-the-difference-in-rb26s/
Share on other sites

If it is a base model GTR, then they are all the same IMO.

There have been a few refinements with the RB26's through out the different models + the engine producing slightly more torque, but that will be due to the tuning of the car.

Even with the slight tweaks here and there, it's not enough to say it's a totally different engine.

Visually the Cam / rocker covers are Red (R34 GTR) VS Black (R32 / R33 GTR)

The Letter "RB" and the numbers "26" are a different font style on the R34 GTR, but that's nothing to be concerned about.

But if you come across a N1 RB26, it is different to the base model engines.

If it is a base model GTR, then they are all the same IMO.

There have been a few refinements with the RB26's through out the different models + the engine producing slightly more torque, but that will be due to the tuning of the car.

Even with the slight tweaks here and there, it's not enough to say it's a totally different engine.

Visually the Cam / rocker covers are Red (R34 GTR) VS Black (R32 / R33 GTR)

The Letter "RB" and the numbers "26" are a different font style on the R34 GTR, but that's nothing to be concerned about.

But if you come across a N1 RB26, it is different to the base model engines.

alright thanks

As above plus,

32 engines, 89 to roughly early93ish had the short oil pump drive snout on the crank.

All others have the longer pump drive.

34 cam timing cover is plastic.

Slighly different cam durations between the 32,33 vs 34.

Slighly different cam durations between the 32,33 vs 34.

you know I've heard that said before but never seen proof? I've had a set of 32 cams degreed so if anyone has sstd 33 or 34 cams done we could check the results.

There may be a difference in the wiring, I've seen a coilpack loom with a different plug at the back.

CAS wiring into the sensor as the R34's use a slightly different CAS, i think it's just a matter of swapping some pins, the CAS drive is different on the r34 CAM too I think.

Yep, coil packs on the 34 have the electronics on the coilpack, so no seperate ignition module like on the 32-33.

Duncan, your correct, the cams are the same specs, the only difference is the pre set valve timing is different on the R34 compared to the 32,33.

Tomei spread sheet shows 113deg on intake cam on 32-33, 117deg on 34.

125deg on ex for 32-33, 120deg on 33 N1, and 121deg on 34.

240deg duration intake on 32-33-34, 236deg duration exhaust on 32-33-34.

32s also had that niggly problem with too much oil to the head and not enough left at the sump when pushed.

I think they rectified (sorta?) this problem for the 33s and 34s?

Just another thing to consider I guess. Unless of course the engine is getting a rebuild which would render this a moot point anyways.

alright thanks

:laugh:

As above plus,

32 engines, 89 to roughly early93ish had the short oil pump drive snout on the crank.

All others have the longer pump drive.

34 cam timing cover is plastic.

Slighly different cam durations between the 32,33 vs 34.

32s also had that niggly problem with too much oil to the head and not enough left at the sump when pushed.

I think they rectified (sorta?) this problem for the 33s and 34s?

Just another thing to consider I guess. Unless of course the engine is getting a rebuild which would render this a moot point anyways.

I too have read about this.

But tend to fail at high power applications (if not changed).

If your R32 GTR is stock / lighly / mildly modified, it would be fine.

Ppl talk alot but unless they've actually got their hands dirty, remove and re-assembly the engine then don't listen to them. 32gtrs engines are time bombs ticking away unless its been look after extreamly well, or built by somebody who knows or actually race their.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Guys,

I'de like to add to this that, whilst there is an inherent problem with the oiling on 32 series RB26s, I believe in many cases there is an excessive exaggeration of the issue caused by generalisations made in popular media such as magazines etc.

I'm ofcourse not saying that there aren't issues but i think that people lose sight of the fact that many of the engines in question have done well over 100'000 Km and in many cases are over 20 years old and we are not talking about 100'000 km of light load either, everyone knows what people buy these cars for.

Just my 2c

Cheers,

Mitch.

Ppl talk alot but unless they've actually got their hands dirty, remove and re-assembly the engine then don't listen to them. 32gtrs engines are time bombs ticking away unless its been look after extreamly well, or built by somebody who knows or actually race their.

Is this true of all 32 RB26's? What about the later ones, or the V-SpecII? I was told V-SpecII had 33 GTR running gear but can't confirm that. Also if you overfill the engine near 1L you can alleviate this.

It is also more a problem on track than on road as it's in high G loads that this happens because the sump is not baffeled good enough.

sorry I disagree....the oiling system is absolutely identical in all motors other than the narrower oil pump drive. I have seen a couple of motors with wear or spun oil pump drives but it is less than 1 in 100 rb26 failures. In fact, go into GTR_Geoff's engine failure thread and find me a single instance where that caused a failure.

All of rb26 series motors can do with some minor improvements for their oil systems....but after 15 years wear on the pump clearances, bearings, crank straightness, rings, pistons, bad tunes, bad oil changes etc etc etc are much more likely to cause issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...