Jump to content
SAU Community

Hair colour  

118 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

A friend and I were recently having a discussion about our preference in hair colour and he reckons that Blondes tend to stick with other Blondes and Brunettes with other Brunettes. I thought this was interesting and it got me thinking, do people subconsciously go for a partner with similar hair colour?

To keep things simple I'm not taking into account Red/Strawberry/Orange etc - Nothing against them :ermm:

I'm curious to see what the facts are so I thought I'd have a bit of fun here. Add Pics, discuss!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317600-the-age-old-battle-nsfw/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

2 of my ex's were blonde when I started seeing them, but eventually ended up brunette/black/dark. I prefer the brunettes, but obviously didn't go for them because they were brunette...

Nah you're right. Same here. This is just a bit of fun, a hypothetical situation.

I voted Blonde, ever since when I was about 10 years old or older, a friend of my showed me a pic of Pamela Anderson and I thought "Fuck I want one of those!" :(

Wanted a blonde ever since.

But there are awesome brunettes and I would go for them as well.

At the end of the day it is just a hair colour.

How so?

because it doesn't give you a corralation between blondes who prefer blondes, blondes who prefer brunettes, brunettes who prefer blondes, and brunettes who prefer brunettes.

All it tells you is how many blondes and brunettes voted, and which is preferred by everyone.

Don't need poll features :(

Just have 4 options:

-You are brunette and prefer blonde

-You are brunette and prefer brunette

-You are blonde and prefer blonde

-You are blonde and prefer brunette

Sorry Adz :P

That said, given there is no data for one of the values in the first variable (as yet) you can still draw conclusions from this :(

I reckon there are trends. Like Pamela Anderson, who spawned a shitload of blonde fans and they were all the rage in the 90's.

Better off with the brunette if you like smarts, cause she can always die her hair blonde. That said, some brunettes are too smart for their own good and can be boring as shit. Brains aren't everything!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yes, every CU on the bus is available via the Consult port, but whether the scanner you are using is capable of talking to the TCU, the ABS/TCS modules, etc etc, is what is at question here. Many of them are only for engine codes. So, if you have one of those, you won't know if the ABS is having a bitch.
    • That's now. R chassis Skylines come from a time when the tolerance in the ADRs was a bit more....slack. My car, on 235/35-17, which is damn near the exact same size as the original 205/55-16, is pretty much bang on correct indicated speed across the whole legal range. That's demonstrated with constant speed run over 5km, and GPS speed. It's just the luck of the draw. My particular speedo head has to be the thing that is "calibrated" that way, because everything else (the diff ratio, the gearbox and the speedo drive**) are all same same as most other Skylines. **OK, so the speedo drive is a Navara unit to drive the R32's cable, not the electronic unit than an R33/4 would normally have with teh same gear on it. Otherwise, I applaud your OCD tendencies, and I would do the same if I needed to.
    • Not too sure, I believe the Nissan consult port does everything? Also just filled up the reservoir to full and the light is still on. The float seems to move up and down fine.
    • The speedo's can be very conservative, when my Mazda NC MX5 speedo is showing 118kph, the GPS, and a calibrated radar.... cop mate.....hits me at around 110kph +/- 1 or 2 kph, and that is on a 215/45 17, stock tyres size is 205/45 17 as well, so weirdly conservative with stock tyre size When my Commodore speedo red 116kph GPS had me at 110kph on 255/40 17, so again conservative Google says manufacturers need to set the speedo from 4 to 10% slower than actual road speed.....for safety.....and compliance  After doing some offset and clearance measurements to see what can fit the NC on 17x8 +40, without guard rolling or rubbing anything at my current ride height, I've decided that when my tyres are toast, I'm going to fit 225/45 17 and see where that gets me IRT actual speed of my speedo and GPS/radar From the online calculator I should be still be doing around 5kph under an actual 110kph when the speedo is showing 110kph My ADHD requires that when I'm doing 110kph on the speedo, that the actual road speed is actually really close to that, and not alot slower And going from 205 to 225 still keeps the car within the %/mm allowable in the NSW vehicle rules and regulations, which is nice, as long as I'm looking at the latest version that is.....LOL https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-13.464-Light-vehicle-modifications-Vehicle-Standards-Information-No-6-November-2013.pdf
    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
×
×
  • Create New...