Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's one of the threads about it:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...turbo+boost+add

Any logical person that knows a bit about physics realises that each pressure can not combine the way people are thinking.

Edited by PM-R33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5198703
Share on other sites

The real question is, if you run a turbo + supercharge setup, what will the boost be :P

Forgot to say too, it isn't so much about how much boost the turbos make, it is more about how hard they WORK to make that. All things being equal, 2 turbos will only have roughly half as much work done on them to make the same boost, since the air FLOW is higher even though boost is the same.

Edited by Thelen
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199336
Share on other sites

^^^ well if the super is receiving air from the turbo it will be compressing compressed and pressurised air therefore e.g 2.5psia from the turbo compressor outlet into super inlet will give 5psia.... It would be like compound turbocharging, 40psi anyone?

If the super and turbo are receiving atmosphere air then if both run 12psi then manifold pressure should be 12psi??? not too sure on this one.

Edit: Let me make sure that im perfectly clear on this subject, if my sr20det made 200rwk at 1bar from a t28 will that mean that two t28's will make 400rwk at 1bar total?

Edited by 2lazy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199371
Share on other sites

manifold prussure, is exactly that, pressure in the manifold, or what we call "boost" when its past positive pressure or absolute pressure

where the pressure comes from is irrelevant, ie 1 turbo, 2 turbos, 3 turbos, supercharger and turbocharger etc

and pressure does not equal volume

this why 15psi on a stock turbo vs 15psi on a GT35R make different levels of power

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199637
Share on other sites

I understand that but on that link there are two arguments, one is that:-

two turbos making both 1bar will make half has much air as one turbo making 1bar(same turbo model as the twin), so they flow the same both twin or single. You will see 1bar on your boost gauge with both set ups but they make ruffly the same amount of hp.

The other argument:-

twin turbos both at 1bar will make 1bar of pressure at the manifold BUT it will flow twice as much air.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199664
Share on other sites

I understand that but on that link there are two arguments, one is that:-

two turbos making both 1bar will make half has much air as one turbo making 1bar(same turbo model as the twin), so they flow the same both twin or single. You will see 1bar on your boost gauge with both set ups but they make ruffly the same amount of hp.

The other argument:-

twin turbos both at 1bar will make 1bar of pressure at the manifold BUT it will flow twice as much air.

You need to remember boost is a measure of restriction to air flow.

Keep everything at the same efficiency, increase air flow, boost will increase...

Hence two turbos at one bar combined flow as much air as one turbo at 1bar, making the same power...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199675
Share on other sites

Exactly, boost is a measure of restriction. It means the turbo(s) are pushing that much air, that the engine can't keep up taking it all in so it builds up and increases in pressure. (Think of blowing up a balloon). It is all about volume of airflow! Turbo(s) technically do not create "boost", they create heaps of airflow that as a result of being in an engine environment ends up being pressurised which is what we call "boost". Hence if you pop an intercooler pipe, no restriction, no boost in the intercooler pipes (theres a lot more that comes into play here but in general that's an easy way to think about it).

Edited by PM-R33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199731
Share on other sites

Exactly, boost is a measure of restriction. It means the turbo(s) are pushing that much air, that the engine can't keep up taking it all in so it builds up and increases in pressure. (Think of blowing up a balloon). It is all about volume of airflow! Turbo(s) technically do not create "boost", they create heaps of airflow that as a result of being in an engine environment ends up being pressurised which is what we call "boost". Hence if you pop an intercooler pipe, no restriction, no boost in the intercooler pipes (theres a lot more that comes into play here but in general that's an easy way to think about it).

That is the best way I've heard someone describe it and should assist people in understanding.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5199836
Share on other sites

pressure is constant but the flow/ volume of air doubles

not exactly. the possible volume of air doubles (free air delivery). once you put them into an enclosed system such as they are on an engine, and have the boost regulated by a wastegate measuring pressure (aka resistance), then you won't get double the airflow. your total airflow won't really change much because the things that are causing the restriction will still cause the same level of restriction whether you compress the air via 1 million mice blowing through straws or the worlds biggest turbo. there is a limit to how much extra air you can flow through the intake before you are going to hit the same restriction and i would guess that it isn't much more than with anything else.

"but people make more power with bigger turbos at the same pressure" is a common reply to that line of thinking, and i understand that, but how much of that is down to the bigger compressor on the turbo and how much is down to the fact that the exhaust flow is much higher and there is much less restriction on the exhaust side of the turbo? i'd say that a fair bit is on the exhaust side and not that much has to do with the bigger compressor (not saying that it doesn't play any part in it, but just not as much as people think).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/317943-dumb-question/#findComment-5207296
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...