Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just been burnt again by the drop down banner adds that have started sprouting up.

In inadvertently mouse over one when trying to use the top right menu options, the damn thing expands and clickawhammo!!! immediate annoyance ensues.

I understand the need for third party advertising here, and i dont know what a viable fix is for this, but cane someone help me try and come up with one because they drive me insane.

Maybe swap the sau banner to the right and the add to the left above the lesser used menu... or something

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/320146-drop-down-banner-ads/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah i could block them, but i like to leave all things enabled as far as SAU goes, i figure the ads are there to help raise cash for C to run the site and all, so i should avoid blocking them where possible.

Cheers Nis, as i said, its more an annoyance than a crisis, extending the ad down to almost 3 times its original length seems a bit cheeky to me.

It will be the ad company not a forum change (i have to deal with ad providers with work).

Just been burnt again by the drop down banner adds that have started sprouting up.

In inadvertently mouse over one when trying to use the top right menu options, the damn thing expands and clickawhammo!!! immediate annoyance ensues.

I understand the need for third party advertising here, and i dont know what a viable fix is for this, but cane someone help me try and come up with one because they drive me insane.

Maybe swap the sau banner to the right and the add to the left above the lesser used menu... or something

I 2nd that motion, this place is becoming worse than channel 7 of late, maybe we should all pay $10/yr membership & piss them off totally, I mean I come on here to read about what my peers are up to or find some info-not to have f*@kin Lewis Hamilton promoting some BS like at the top of page today

^ mate please, the ad's here have not increased one iota for years. A little bit more fact wouldn't hurt.

The only minor addition was google ad's at the very bottom of the page in this time, something you probably didnt even notice.

The ad's everywhere else have remained the same for roughly 4 years now.

i concurr, its just the expanding ads that are an annoyance. The Land Rover one from last month was particularly annoying.

I'll be honest and say it actually led to me visiting the forum less, maybe sometjhing to consider going forward?

Cheers blokes, benno.

^ mate please, the ad's here have not increased one iota for years. A little bit more fact wouldn't hurt.

The only minor addition was google ad's at the very bottom of the page in this time, something you probably didnt even notice.

The ad's everywhere else have remained the same for roughly 4 years now.

Point taken, prob was a bit harshly put but, I stand by what I said. I accidentally hit the banner ad which covered the search icon in top task bar & was nearly blown outa my seat. I can understand a certain amount of advertising is inevitable esp with site maintenance costs rising all the time-but I would much rather pay than have them on here.

As to what I do & dont notice-I made the call didn't I? Was directed to unfolding banners at top which take up half a screen when mouse runs across them & they sure as hell weren't like that ever before(-not like Medicare ad which is no prob as it stays the same size) & the ones at bottom which dont unfold either-they are fine-ish lol

Besides the point- if some one doesn't like something then they can say their piece as far as I am concerned-providing there is no personal attack involved & their certainly wasn't one of those

As i said - it'll be a change from the advertisers end, not ours.

Something they will have changed and C will get onto it and sort it out in due time.

Yes it's a pain, yes it's an inconvenience - but at the same time this site needs income to exist.

We will have donations up eventually, but we cannot rely on them for site income/existence and MUST have ad's as certain income.

As i said - it'll be a change from the advertisers end, not ours.

Something they will have changed and C will get onto it and sort it out in due time.

Yes it's a pain, yes it's an inconvenience - but at the same time this site needs income to exist.

We will have donations up eventually, but we cannot rely on them for site income/existence and MUST have ad's as certain income.

Understood mate

Ahhh I see what you mean, I just got hit with the Lewis Homo ad by accidently waving my mouse near the top corner.....and the reply page did not finishing loading until the ad finished.

As Ash said I'm suspect Christian is not aware of or did not agree to such intrusive ads, but it may still take more than a day or 2 to action

BTW Mr Wooster....you have dribbled enough on these pages that its time for you to donate once the facility is back up and running :happy:

Stimps, the bandwidth from an ad is bugger all., and as mentioned advertising is needed to help run this site that you use free of charge.

Keep that in mind when you complain, its one thing if you say "its funcitonality is annoying, how can we change it for the better" its another if you say "your banner ad is costing me bandwidth that i pay for when i visit your site and use its features free of charge".

Perhaps if there was some waiver for paying members its one thing, but beggars cant be choosers.

and tbh, i prefer leaving the ads on so that maybe, one day, the cheap viagra ad i've been waiting for might pop up and both myself and prank can benefit from my clicking

Yeah, I'm not a fan of the expanding ones either, I'll contact my guy and see if we can get them off the rotation.

For the record, please please please dont use Adblock (Basti, I'm looking in your direction.) While you may not want the ads supporting multi national conglomerates from appearing on these pages, until we find another source of constant funding, we *need* them (and I really mean *need*.) Adblock defeats the purpose and if you want to support the site, you'll not use it.

I'm not a big 'ad' guy - I just need to make sure that at the end of the month, the giant hosting bill is paid from somewhere other than my own personal income.

I'm not a big 'ad' guy - I just need to make sure that at the end of the month, the giant hosting bill is paid from somewhere other than my own personal income.

that....is a VERY selfish attitude. WTF? I want free forums full of good information where I can read, post and download as much as I want while someone else pays for it!

Yeah, I'm not a fan of the expanding ones either, I'll contact my guy and see if we can get them off the rotation.

For the record, please please please dont use Adblock (Basti, I'm looking in your direction.) While you may not want the ads supporting multi national conglomerates from appearing on these pages, until we find another source of constant funding, we *need* them (and I really mean *need*.) Adblock defeats the purpose and if you want to support the site, you'll not use it.

I'm not a big 'ad' guy - I just need to make sure that at the end of the month, the giant hosting bill is paid from somewhere other than my own personal income.

:thumbsup: yeah no worries mate. im using it atm as a way to load pages faster, seeing as i've hit my DL cap. will turn it off once im back on full speed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...