Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So would shortening the length of the actuator rod bring on boost faster or slower or neither?

Shorter = more aggressive boost control,

Too short and you'll get boost spikes.

You want the actuator to do most of the boost work and your boost controler should fine tune the last couple of psi.

If it still doesn't hold boost get a big can actuator

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's funny how every workshop that i talk to deny that it would be the actuator,even though i have told them that other people with this turbo have had actuator problems.Some say that its a bigger turbo so its gonna be laggier than stock.And i point out to them that its as laggy as a 3540 and if it was so big it wouldn't take 16 psi to make 300rwhp.Then there is : i reckon your cat is blocked,but i have a test pipe on it (decat) until i get the issue sorted.So i've tried shortening the actuator rod and it feels a bit more responsive but boost just keeps climbing the higher the revs go,even with the boost tee turned all the way down.Havent had a chance to talk to MTQ yet as i work through their business hours and they dont have any wastegates on their website unless i'm looking in the wrong place.Any help on finding an actuator that will do the job would be appreciated.Cheers

bearing in mind the ax53 runs the ceramic rear wheel still!

i believe mine was running out of puff around the 260rwkw @18-19psi..

the p25 rear housing is on the sorta small side..

but should have better results than this..

this is my result with the stock actuator and eboost..

post-16535-1274354709_thumb.jpg

post-16535-1274354726_thumb.jpg

way too much lag for the turbo, looks like your boost controller would be the first problem...

had one (snozzle now owns it I think) on my rb20 about 4 years ago. made 305rwhp on 18psi dropping off to about 15 with a turbotech boost controller and stock actuator

im pretty sure the problem with not holding boost it due to the actuator being blown open at high revs

your boost keeps climbing because its internal gate and your running a gutted cat.

When you shorten the actuator and it spikes that means its not opening up enough. Need to get an upgraded actuator. Not sure what a gutted cat has to do with boost control.

It's funny how every workshop that i talk to deny that it would be the actuator,even though i have told them that other people with this turbo have had actuator problems.Some say that its a bigger turbo so its gonna be laggier than stock.And i point out to them that its as laggy as a 3540 and if it was so big it wouldn't take 16 psi to make 300rwhp.Then there is : i reckon your cat is blocked,but i have a test pipe on it (decat) until i get the issue sorted.So i've tried shortening the actuator rod and it feels a bit more responsive but boost just keeps climbing the higher the revs go,even with the boost tee turned all the way down.Havent had a chance to talk to MTQ yet as i work through their business hours and they dont have any wastegates on their website unless i'm looking in the wrong place.Any help on finding an actuator that will do the job would be appreciated.Cheers

That's really funny and sad at the same time. I can't beleive all the workshops you spoke to think that kind of lag is acceptable for only 300rwhp.

with a internal gated turbo, run a full exhaust with a 3" cat... set boost to 10psi... gut the cat and u watch ur 10psi spike i can garantee it.. no back pressure.. been there done it all before...dont tell me otherwise.

with a internal gated turbo, run a full exhaust with a 3" cat... set boost to 10psi... gut the cat and u watch ur 10psi spike i can garantee it.. no back pressure.. been there done it all before...dont tell me otherwise.

Ho does less back pressure equal more boost? I thought less back pressure will allow the wastegate to open more freely. More back presure will force it shut and spike.

That's really funny and sad at the same time. I can't beleive all the workshops you spoke to think that kind of lag is acceptable for only 300rwhp.

Tell me about it.I mean all i wanted was a nice responsive turbo.I just hope its either the actuator or the boost controller.Im stuck with it now so i just gotta do what i can.

with a internal gated turbo, run a full exhaust with a 3" cat... set boost to 10psi... gut the cat and u watch ur 10psi spike i can garantee it.. no back pressure.. been there done it all before...dont tell me otherwise.

Sorry to stray off topic.

I have to agree with Fat Tony.

I have RB25DET, 3" full exhaust w/gutted cat, FMIC, pod, CAI(partially blocked due to r&r) and Blitz DSBC spec R, Stock turbo and actuator. No problems at all with spiking. Just had to adjust the gain on the boost controller and away we go, quick, smooth 10psi all the way to 7000rpm.

Sounds like your problem was something like crappy boost controller maybe?

Anyway back to topic.

My advice would be to check with matty what his thoughts are. he is very good at what he does, probably the best tuner around these parts, from what i am told. But, as everyone said, sounds like actuator. Also as far as boost controllers go, get either an electronic one with dual solenoid of one of those Turbotech Boost Controllers I read so much about here at SAU.

I am thinking by using an electronic controller with gain setting features, that increasing the gain might mask your problem but then may cause boost spiking.

Thats my 2 cents! Hope it helps in some way!

The only thing can affect a turbo's normal response is the wastegate flap. It will do that if not shut. So to pre-load or a stronger actuator.

Else send it in, we can engineer a rear housing for it to full boost by 3000RPM. It Just might spin its ass off. lol

hay mate i had the same turbo on my built sr20 in a s14 but with a p20 housing and it made nearly the same power as that and was about the same amount of lag.

there pretty awesome turbo too bad they are discontinued

The only thing can affect a turbo's normal response is the wastegate flap. It will do that if not shut. So to pre-load or a stronger actuator.

Else send it in, we can engineer a rear housing for it to full boost by 3000RPM. It Just might spin its ass off. lol

would the actuators you sell be suitable?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...