Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dyno tune will be a while still when I'm ready to adjust the cam gears.Until then its road tuned

N1GTR.. Technically the only thing new about this is the actuators, and I'm sure if you purchaced -9 from gcg etc. they would put on the same 8.8psi actuator like what I got. Otherwise, same -1 / -9 / Gtss unit.

I think response can be tweaked further with the tune and also with boost control as there is no creep and very minimal spike(1psi) as is right now, so definately some gain to be have there, even if minimal.....and then there are cam gears

Have only been driving it a few days, but it does pull a touch harder on 13psi, But so far I'm satisfied that I have turbs capable of 300rwkw with stock like response.

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/products/turbochargers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9

GT2859R - 780371-1

GT2860R - 707160-5

GT2860R - 707160-7

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10

GT2871R - 780371-2

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

This is the last dyno tune I had, -9's, nismo pump, 555cc injectors, nismo AFM's, cam gears, stock engine.

post-12712-0-13533100-1318426627_thumb.gifpost-12712-0-59905300-1318426635_thumb.gif

Figures in all wheel killerwasps.

Since then I have fitted a different boost controller and the wastgates are now set to open at 16PSI with controller off.

Needs another tune to set boost controller and get rid of the drop in boost pressure. 22PSI tune to follow.

I'll let you guys know....

Aaaaaah my bad!

Here's what I thought you meant;

http://www.turbobyga...ers.html#medium

GT2854R - 471171-9

GT2859R - 707160-9....Gtss

GT2859R - 780371-1....Gtss with act

GT2860R - 707160-5.....2530

GT2860R - 707160-7....R34 N1

GT2860R - 739548-9

GT2860RS - 739548-1

GT2860RS - 739548-5

GT2871R - 472560-15

GT2871R - 743347-1

GT2871R - 743347-3

GT2871R - 707160-10....Gtrs

GT2871R - 780371-2....Gtrs with act

GT2871R - 743347-2

GT2871R - 743347-4

GT2871R - 771847-1

GT2876R - 705330-1

GT2876R - 705330-2

post-42272-0-02044400-1318454661_thumb.png

:thumbsup:

I guess they didn't say anything about injector duty.

I was seeing roughly 90% on a cold night with 22psi peak in the midrange through to 17psi or so at the top end. Rich enough to see black out the back on full boost :whistling:

Stock fuel reg too....

Should be okay, guess I'll find out.

Well since there is NO info on this here I just thought i'd put this up and update as I go along.

The comparision below is results for the -1 turbo which is the -9 that comes with a 8.8psi actuator from Garrett, compared to stock R33 Gtr turbos.

post-42272-0-01856100-1318371152_thumb.png

The top window is the -1/-9 which reaches the same level of boost(13.3psi) about 200-300rpm later than the stocks, and the car drives basically the same as before.

The ONLY thing changed was the boost level was raised only one notch on the controller (profecb2) to get the same level for comparision....start/gain etc was left the same and the pfc tune was untouched.

My boost control kit reads 1psi low for some reason, hence 13.3psi

Ignore the scale on the bottom as this would be different due to the length(secs) of each log

Well with two turns in on the actuators I was able to get it down to stock like response, well on paper at least....To me it feels even better than stock coming into boost

post-42272-0-75110700-1318977532_thumb.png

Top -1/-9, bottom is stock

Is boost creep the only thing to look for with too much preload? I want to shorten them some more :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...