Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mine runs fine like that (and has done for 20thou km), but if you are feeding it too much oil it would make sense that it would need a more serious drain.

Next time you have it off have a look at your bango bolt, it should have a pin sized hole in it (not completely hollow).

Using the standard banjo bolts, the hole size/s are alot smaller than the size of the bolt itself, half or there abouts...

Either way it's fixed now. New exhaust today. Standard dump and front, Magnaflow 3" cat, high-flow center muffler, 2.5" piping all the way to replace the current varying range that runs down as small as 2 1/4". Very keen to see how it goes afterwards.

Mine runs fine like that (and has done for 20thou km), but if you are feeding it too much oil it would make sense that it would need a more serious drain.

Next time you have it off have a look at your bango bolt, it should have a pin sized hole in it (not completely hollow).

Using the standard banjo bolts, the hole size/s are alot smaller than the size of the bolt itself, half or there abouts...

Either way it's fixed now. New exhaust today. Standard dump and front, Magnaflow 3" cat, high-flow center muffler, 2.5" piping all the way to replace the current varying range that runs down as small as 2 1/4". Very keen to see how it goes afterwards.

Why 2.5"? Even on stock dump/front I had a noticeable power increase going from 2.5" to 3" on my NA+T (felt looser/less held back and picked up top end) Also 3" bell mouth dump is only $100 which I would also recommend, high comp has lots of hot exhaust to vent!

Either way, keen for results :P

Yeah just saw all that, a lot of the information on the internet is just re-preached 'yarns' without any understanding, but this is not one of them. Even with the stock dump/front pipe (2.5") a 3" cat back gives a very decent gain over a 2.5" system across the entire rev range (initial spool time, midrange AND peak power).

I used to agree with your point of view, thinking my N/A+T's would love 2.5" on 200kW+ (my goal), that if it can flow the power its good enough, but it really isn’t. There is so much free power just through efficiency that you are losing out on from stock exhaust. My R31 RB30e+t, R33 RB25DE+T both went from 2.5" systems (one press, one mandrel) with straight through perforated hot dogs and mufflers (not offset or chambered) and both had excellent gains in throttle response, delivery, just general engine feel and top end (not just the figure) with zero downside (even exhaust was roughly the same volume).

The car of course will drive well and will make decent power on 2.5", but the point is it will be better the entire range and make more power on 3". As the thread reports it is nothing like with matching N/A systems with exhaust velocity and backpressure trade offs (losing top or bottom end).

Another example is my daily, an R34 GTT - completely standard with nistune and 10psi gets 175kW at the wheels. I loaded the same tune onto a mates R34 which was identical (completely standard engine/cooler) on the same boost but with a 3" split dump, 3" cat and 3" cat back and it made 195kW at the wheels, completely different to drive; 1000x better in every way (except I like my daily silent).

Because of this I am forced to eventually get a CES turbo back system, not just for peak figure but for the entire drivable range.

You really can’t understand until you do it for yourself, now you have a 2.5" system that’s fine. Do all your other modifications, hit the bottle neck (and realise it’s the obvious next step for more power) and then move on, but the debate just seems to be for self justification more than anything (not meaning to be an asshole its just how I see it).

You really can't understand until you do it for yourself, now you have a 2.5" system that's fine. Do all your other modifications, hit the bottle neck (and realise it's the obvious next step for more power) and then move on, but the debate just seems to be for self justification more than anything (not meaning to be an asshole its just how I see it).

I didn't view the comment that way, so no offence taken. :thumbsup:

I understand the idea behind the 3" vs. 2.5", and admitted in the thread, that more than likely i'll end up with a 3" system, for now at least i'm happy with the 2.5" set-up, it's dramatically changed the feel of the car, fixed the boost drop, yet keeps it very quiet and no drone. After driving/riding passenger in a mates' car with a 3" system and the basic mods, I hated the sound of it and the drone at ~2750rpm @100kph, with at high-flow cat, muffler and cannon, I know a better system could eliminate these problems, personal preference I suppose...

In the exhaust theory thread, it states bigger is better at the start of the system, so a 3" dump/front will be the next step provided I don't encounter detonation on the dyno. If with the exhaust dropped and a 3" front i see a ~+%10 difference, then i'll switch to 3", if i gain less than ~%10rwkw, then i'm not going to bother until I find the bottle-neck. 10 degrees ambient temperature and an average air filter would find %10rwkw...

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

I am currently in the middle of turboing my R32 RB25DE using R32 RB20 parts.

I am unsure what spark plugs are the best to use.

From what i have read in this thread most people have used plugs with a heat range of 7 but

if I check the NGK website, the NA RB25DE uses plugs with a heat range of 5 and the RB20DET uses a heat range of 6.

Does anyone know why I should be using plugs with a heat range of 7 instead of 6 (as per standard for turbo)

Thanks

Jason

Hi all,

I am currently in the middle of turboing my R32 RB25DE using R32 RB20 parts.

I am unsure what spark plugs are the best to use.

From what i have read in this thread most people have used plugs with a heat range of 7 but

if I check the NGK website, the NA RB25DE uses plugs with a heat range of 5 and the RB20DET uses a heat range of 6.

Does anyone know why I should be using plugs with a heat range of 7 instead of 6 (as per standard for turbo)

Thanks

Jason

This is a great read for me. Two reasons,

I have and RS4 with Rb25DET. Was stock when bought 5 years ago. Have modded to 3" turbo back, JJ Bellmouth and Hi Flow Cat.

Great improvement was felt. Next up installed FMIC and Greddy copy FFP. with Pod, that really gave it some extra. Am very happy with the bang for buck.

I have a redP son. I got him a 25G Stagea with RB25DE. Little bugger now wants a (can't say the name) non Nissan. So I am going to turbo it and all the info is here. AFAIK there are very few N/A Stags in Oz This had been a personal import.. Have all the parts now except for the bigger brakes.

  • 3 weeks later...

This is a great read for me. Two reasons,

I have and RS4 with Rb25DET. Was stock when bought 5 years ago. Have modded to 3" turbo back, JJ Bellmouth and Hi Flow Cat.

Great improvement was felt. Next up installed FMIC and Greddy copy FFP. with Pod, that really gave it some extra. Am very happy with the bang for buck.

I have a redP son. I got him a 25G Stagea with RB25DE. Little bugger now wants a (can't say the name) non Nissan. So I am going to turbo it and all the info is here. AFAIK there are very few N/A Stags in Oz This had been a personal import.. Have all the parts now except for the bigger brakes.

What a lucky son you have. :P

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, seeking opinions after a slightly disappointing result:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/249186-nat-power-results-na-t-turbo-conversions-only/page__view__findpost__p__5981406

In brief, the car made an overall low figure. AFR's "peaked" at around 8.5-9:1. After dropping the exhaust, removing the air filter, and seeing no worth-while gains in changing either (yet), and talking to the dyno operator, he said the next option is simply to take out fuel to find more power. But I honestly don't know why it's so rich? Other problem being boost gets unstable after 5000rpm, mechanical gauge goes from a solid 7 to flickering like crazy between 7 and 5 psi, which again could still be a rich mixture not burning properly?

Relevant mods: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/index.php?app=garage&do=view&id=1515

Ideas include:

-Too much fuel pressure (doubtful with a GTST reg, injectors, rail and Walbro GSS-341 pump)

-The AFM is still a N/A series 1 R33 item, is the turbo one different? Ie. the AFM hitting 5 volts too soon and ECU going into R&R?

And yes, i'm the muppet with the 2.5" exhaust, but dropping it at the dump/front pipe and removing the air filter made little difference. And at 138 kw I doubt it's causing problems anyway?

Open to suggestions ideas etc.

Cheers, Josh.

Its a mass air flow meter, pressure has no effect. Also both N/A and Turbo AFM's only measure atmospheric pressure as they are placed before the turbo (aka out of boost), but putting them in boost makes no difference as 500CFM @ +14psi travelling at x speed is the same as 500CFM @ ATMO travelling at 2xX speed (for example).

Its all about the voltage range (which is the same between the 2 items), if his AFM is healthy it shouldn’t make any difference. It still wouldn’t hurt to swap it with another though as it still could be the cause, it could be because the AFM was already faulty and miss-reading, and the increased airflow is throwing it out more and more.

That said, my money is definitely on some sort of boost leak or R&R issue.

I once had a similar issue with an RB30e+t, couldn’t find the leak so I moved the AFM into boost as close to the throttle body as possible and it fixed the symptoms (though still slightly down on power as the turbo had to work twice as hard to produce the same boost) at least until I could find the cause.

What BOV are you using? Plumb back? I've known some ATMO's to leak boost and cause similar issues.

Using the stock plumb-back BOV. Might try blocking/disconnecting it next run to see if it makes a difference.

Checked over the intake clamps/piping/cooler last night, all ok and no visible faults, sorta hard to check for leaks under boost (ie. soapy water) without the dyno. Not to say the cooler isn't leaking or somewhere else though. R&R is still a possibility too.

We have a MODIS at work, hooked it up and took the car for a drive. AFM appears to be ranging normally, hit a maximum of 4.94 volts, WOT, 2nd gear, ~6950rpm. Voltage goes up consistently with TPS/RPM but car still feels the same. Also reset the TPS before-hand due to it having a base setting of .30 volts.

@ WYSTKY. In the top end, i'm not actually running the full 7 psi, the mechanical gauge fluctuates after 5000rpm between 7psi and 5psi, so it's making the maximum figure on ~5psi, combined with as much as 8.5:1 AFR, not bad power......

I'm going to keep checking the basics, it's also due for a service so will get onto that between now and the next run. Still want to check the fuel pressure in case of a bad reg or simply too much pressure.

Edited by blk94r33

So far so good.

Removed the cooler, bathed it-ok. Re-fitted, re-checked the clamps and hoses including the BOV return, AAC, turbo outlet etc. etc.. Took off the BOV, still has resistance and appears OK. Ran start-ya-bastard around the intake manifold, plenum and throttle body, injectors, turbo etc.-no change (again, could change under boost) and checked all the bolts/nuts. But otherwise all appears fine in terms of air leaks. confused.gif

Fuel pressure is normal, 45psi at idle, goes up to 55-60psi when revved-appears to be working. Will re-drive the car tomorrow and see if anything feels different, but otherwise going to look at some form of engine management or even an SAFC at this stage and work from there.

Its a mass air flow meter, pressure has no effect. Also both N/A and Turbo AFM's only measure atmospheric pressure as they are placed before the turbo (aka out of boost), but putting them in boost makes no difference as 500CFM @ +14psi travelling at x speed is the same as 500CFM @ ATMO travelling at 2xX speed (for example).

Its all about the voltage range (which is the same between the 2 items), if his AFM is healthy it shouldn't make any difference. It still wouldn't hurt to swap it with another though as it still could be the cause, it could be because the AFM was already faulty and miss-reading, and the increased airflow is throwing it out more and more.

That said, my money is definitely on some sort of boost leak or R&R issue.

I once had a similar issue with an RB30e+t, couldn't find the leak so I moved the AFM into boost as close to the throttle body as possible and it fixed the symptoms (though still slightly down on power as the turbo had to work twice as hard to produce the same boost) at least until I could find the cause.

What BOV are you using? Plumb back? I've known some ATMO's to leak boost and cause similar issues.

lol, ur bloody right, long day yesterday, I keep forgetting because I have relocated mine in the intercooler piping so it does get +ve pressure, but factory location (infront of turbo) wont do that.

In terms of the na afm maxing out, is it not possible the n/a one may not be able to read as much air at a particular voltage compared to gtst? - eg the n/a will give a 4.2 volts at X amount of air while the gtst one will read 3.2?

+1 for boost leak or afm issues.

lol, ur bloody right, long day yesterday, I keep forgetting because I have relocated mine in the intercooler piping so it does get +ve pressure, but factory location (infront of turbo) wont do that.

In terms of the na afm maxing out, is it not possible the n/a one may not be able to read as much air at a particular voltage compared to gtst? - eg the n/a will give a 4.2 volts at X amount of air while the gtst one will read 3.2?

+1 for boost leak or afm issues.

Not finding any air leaks yet, but as I said might need to get the car on boost on the dyno and re-check.

Not %100 about the AFM? As I said, it hit ~4.95 volts at near max revs, stock (for the ECU) boost, and WOT, so I suppose the GTST AFM would range up to 5 volts, and the N/A one only uses say 2/3's of that voltage? I imagine if the NA AFM was different it would "top out" at a much lower air flow than 7psi?

Only other thing I could think of would be a dodgey vac/pressure gauge reading low, and i'm in-fact running more air and hitting R&R....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to it's full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so damn hot in there, that made it all the more easy to remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
    • Thanks for that, hadn’t used my brain enough to think about that. 
    • Also playing with fire if they start to flow more air down low than what the stock twins can. It's not even up top you need to worry, it can be at 3000rpm and part throttle and it's getting way more flow than it should.
    • Any G40/1000 or G40/1250 results out there?  
    • You still want a proper tune on the stock ECU though. Stock tune + stock ECU with GT-SS/-9s is probably playing with fire if you're running more than stock airflow/power.
×
×
  • Create New...