Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering about something that I do whilst driving an auto.

When I'm stopped at the lights, or somewhere for for an extended period, I change in to neutral. I have always done this with autos, because I thought that it would cause less wear on the box and breaks than to keep it in drive whilst stopped. However I've never done any research to prove this theory.

Does anyone know if this would be true, would it make any difference?

What do other people do?

Cheers,

Dave-

Edited by bayslideblue
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/334913-auto-driving-techniques/
Share on other sites

At a complete guess, with no evidence to back it up, wouldn't constantly be changing to and from neutral be causing more wear than leaving it in drive?

I just leave it in drive, always have with auto cars, never really put much thought into it it though to be honest

Most certainly does cause more wear. Everytime a gear is engaged there is a small amount of slippage in the clutches and bands. Selecting neutral all the time means reselecting first gear everytime. Most boxes the clutch for all forward gears stays engaged the whole time.

If any one needs a "mint" condition auto box for an s1

mine will be available shortly

doesn't slip or flare,like brand new....perfect...

I Always leave it in drive,I never flip thro the gears trying to break something

:):blush::geek:

I also put it in nuetral

I always remember old shitty auto's vibrating away when stationary - Nuetral always stopped the vibrations

Mines nowhere near that atage but I thought that by putting it nuetral at lights it was way of avoiding that problem

However I can see the logic behind extra wear and tear - as every gear change causes this

wouldn't constantly be changing to and from neutral be causing more wear than leaving it in drive?

Yeah I was wondering about that, I thought that it could possibly cause more wear changing from neutral to drive more often than nescesary.

Alright I guess I'll leave it in drive from now on.

Cheers

What about using the tiptronic function all the time. Is that more likely shorten the gearbox's life?

It wouldn't be there if you weren't meant to use it..

I use tiptronic pretty much everywhere and I drive hard, even with all the flaring that used to go on on the 1-2 change, when I had the mild shift kit put in, the guy said the box was squeaky clean inside!

I also put it in nuetral

I always remember old shitty auto's vibrating away when stationary - Nuetral always stopped the vibrations

Mines nowhere near that atage but I thought that by putting it nuetral at lights it was way of avoiding that problem

However I can see the logic behind extra wear and tear - as every gear change causes this

hmmm, the reason for the vibration is because the revs were too low, and the engine wasn't idling properly. Putting it in neutral lifts the revs...and the problem goes away. Nothing to do with the auto at all.

I've spoken to a few auto transmission specialists (I normally try to extract as much info as I can when I go in for a service...yeah one of those annoying customers...but hey i'm paying for it), and they all pretty much say that modern automatics work best when you just leave them in drive and let them work it all out. The computer in the auto is probably as complex as the one for the engine, and it knows what to do in any given situation. Most auto boxes have stuff programmed in to protect the box no matter what happens.

Having said that, its fine to use tiptronic too. As has been said already, if it was bad for the auto, they wouldn't put the tiptronic mode in. Obviously the harsher you are with it the more it will wear...but under normal use there's no problem at all.

As for putting it in neutral...have a think about it. Autos are all electronically controlled these days - so if it was better for the box to go into neutral when stationary - it would do that by itself. The fact is, its completely unnecessary, and you may as well just leave it in drive because that's what they're designed to do.

Actually...

Some modern transmissions do shift into neutral when they sense the vehicle is not moving... All in the name of extracting better fuel consumption...

Actually they shift into second gear, to stop vehicle squat.

Actually...

Some modern transmissions do shift into neutral when they sense the vehicle is not moving... All in the name of extracting better fuel consumption...

lol I would love to know what difference it actually makes to fuel consumption. I'm guessing it wouldn't even be measurable.

if your that worried DON`T DRIVE IT ,

:D

Not really that worried, was just a habit of mine and I was curious to find out which would be better.

Besides I guess the quicker it wears out, the sooner I will be contemplating a manual conversion.

lol I would love to know what difference it actually makes to fuel consumption. I'm guessing it wouldn't even be measurable.

When I had Falcon and Commonwhore hire cars, I could see the trip computer drop by about 0.1 or 0.2 l/hr from drive to neutral.

Has to make some tiny difference as you are no longer sloshing around the fluid in the torque converter... I think this is one of the reasons why CVTs have such good fuel consumption, as they actually have a clutch pack that completely disengages whilst stationary...

In the UK people who have driving lessons in autos are taught to move the transmission into Neutral and apply the handbrake when stationary, as this is what you would do in a manual vehicle. Prevents accidents caused by people who might accidently take their foot off the brake pedal.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...