Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

how is a HKS T300S turbine? any good? never head of one..

In 1996 HKS were using twin T300s on their drag 180SX which ran an RB26, with these turbos the engine was rated at 860ps.

So i cant give you the exact numbers/details, but i imagine the turbo is rated about 380-400hp, and most likley an oil cooled, 360deg thrust bearing turbo.

Yeh its sure to be older then the HKS turbos based on the Garret GT range of ball bearing turbos. (IE GT2510, GT2530, GT2535 GT2540, GT2540R)

Im guessing it has a similar power rating to the HKS GT2540 (????only a guess based on the hp of RB26s used as HKS promo cars)

dude(groove32),

i already mentioned the HKS GT2540 to you.

HKS rate them at 350ps, and state a power level of 250kw (340ps) at the engine on 1bar on an RB25DET. see below

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/products/turbo/...c_gt/ac_gt.html

Turbo Tits,

you should refer to the link above also, as HKS officically state that the GT2535 (also on a RB25DET) makes 240kw (327ps) at the engine, so i don't think it will have the 'minerals' to make 220rwkw on an RB20DET with 1-1.2bar of boost, even if at all.

rs500 this argument has been battled by Rev210 vs many! i dont know how the rated engine figure to rwkw figure on a chasis dyno works, but the rwkw figures quoted for the RB20/25's over here running these little HKS's are correct.

its well known that a stock turbo can make ~200rwkw (roughly 280hp), yet isnt this turbo only rated to 300hp? so technically with drivetrain loss, it cant make 200rwkw, but it does. It could be the chassis dyno's readings or how they measure power. I dont know, i dont think an absolute answer was given the last time we all argued this point about turbo's rated power vs rwkw's!

2530 is killer on an RB20.

the other thing with just quoting peak figures is it doenst say anything about reponse or powerband. I have never heard of anyone speak well of the HKS2540 on GTS, ie in twin from, except if you are after a pure drag application. I have read road tests (well dyno acutally) and that said the same thing, very laggy, very narrow power band without winding the rev limit hard to the right - that was on a SR20.

On the other hand, I have never heard anyone say anything bad about 2530 - and I have been in a 2530 powered RB20, and it performs really well low and midrange with a decent top end. Lag was barely noticeable compared to the stock turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jack the back of the car up, pull that wheel off, pull that sensor out, and put a bore scope into the hole to inspect the outer casing, see if anything looks damaged before you pull the whole thing apart.
    • Ergh... So I pulled the speed sensor out again and the tip was shiny so I think it's rubbing the bearing. The bearing contains the magnets for the speed sensor so I think when the first sensor broke it damaged the magnet ring on the bearing.  This is just a Google image, but there is a hole going to the bearing. So when the tip broke off the old sensor I'm guessing it fouled the bearing... As the magnet is only protected by a plastic cover it would be easy to damage it. So I guess I'm doing a bearing again.   
    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
×
×
  • Create New...