Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sigh... Thats not really a useful comparison. You can clearly see the GT3076 setup has notable issues.

Is there any surge on it Simon? Looks like its building and then just tapers a tad early on the climb up.

Something my 600hp GT30 did, it wasn't really audible eithe which didnt help to workout

I found Simons power curve was alittle odd, I've seen few other members running it on RB20dets it seems to make more mid range but not as much top end. But none of them actually run that much boost either.

Also the comparison dynosheet shown against GT3076s, Those 2x cars got lot more modifications then what my test car has. I believe I have no issues beating them in response, power and torque if I decide to modify mine in the same manner. Except I don't expect any one who uses my turbos to have all those mods.

Stao, they are clearly not sorted setups regardless of the level of modification (compared to one that is, again regardless of mods).

To put such a 'comparison' up serves little purpose and would otherwise mislead people that might not be as aware (i think i've had to say that, what, 3 times now? :thumbsup: ).

Are you talking about between 5000-5250?!?

Earlier! Around 3000-3300rpm-ish where it starts coming up and then sorta kicks another bit and goes up harder.

Could just be the way it is :P

I found Simons power curve was alittle odd, I've seen few other members running it on RB20dets it seems to make more mid range but not as much top end. But none of them actually run that much boost either.

Also the comparison dynosheet shown against GT3076s, Those 2x cars got lot more modifications then what my test car has. I believe I have no issues beating them in response, power and torque if I decide to modify mine in the same manner. Except I don't expect any one who uses my turbos to have all those mods.

if you have nothing to hide then post boost graphs for all 3, should reveal whats really going on....

good result simon, where did you get it tuned?

Sigh... Thats not really a useful comparison. You can clearly see the GT3076 setup has notable issues.

Thats overlayed with my dyno plot by the looks of it, my coils completely failed not long afterwards and I have a set of Splitfires in there now - but thats probably more to do with the wavy line than the huge difference in torque once full boost is reached. My car was running a reasonably stable 16-17psi boost curve on the GT3076R, that other car is blatently running more boost.

I can't provide a boost plot for my dyno "curve" he used there, so he won't be able to - but as much as there were "issues" with mine they wouldn't be anywhere near enough to cause that torque difference once his reaches full boost. To me that overlay looks like a GT30R running a normal boost curve overlayed with a laggier turbo running more boost but for some reason (running out of flow?) boost drops in the high end so its making barely any more power than the GT30R.

A copy of the dyno plot and a boost curve on the same page for that setup to prove its staying under 17psi all the way would prove otherwise, but until then it doesn't look too good.

Also the comparison dynosheet shown against GT3076s, Those 2x cars got lot more modifications then what my test car has. I believe I have no issues beating them in response, power and torque if I decide to modify mine in the same manner. Except I don't expect any one who uses my turbos to have all those mods.

What a load of crap. My car is running a Chinese intercooler, a bone stock (high km) RB25, an internally gated GT3076R and all stock manifolds. The only thing I can see any hint of being better on my car is the turbo...

You are right, you'd beat mine in power/torque going by that plot but you are clearly running measureably more boost through it through the midrange - and I am very doubtful of keeping up in terms of response given it can't even spool as well against a dyno. If mine was running the boost it looks like you're pushing through that thing (and didn't have dying coils), the plot you provided quite possibly wouldn't be in the game.

I seriously dislike seeing dealers try to pull the wool over people's eyes to make their product look better than others by using compromised or not-really-comparable setups as legit comparisons.

PS, the other GT3076R dyno plot which is lower than my "red" line and the ATR43G3 turbo looks like it'd actually deal to both of us if it was run on a Dynapack - again, very misleading graph to show

good result simon, where did you get it tuned?

Judging by the dyno....looks like Sean at Allstar Garage.

FWIW my car is booked in to be tuned on this same dyno next week (SR with twin scroll 3076 - 52 trim) BP98 tune.

Edited by juggernaut1
Judging by the dyno....looks like Sean at Allstar Garage.

FWIW my car is booked in to be tuned on this same dyno next week (SR with twin scroll 3076 - 52 trim) BP98 tune.

Yeah Sean from Allstar :D

Took it for a drive last night, starts peeling out when it comes on boost in 3rd gear!

Do you know what sort of injector duty the 750's are getting up to with the fuel blend simon?

Unfortunately not, we unhooked the car from the dyno and put wheels back on and then all thought the same question but had forgotten to look...

Will hook up a laptop when I get a chance and run some data logging to have a look :D

Lithum:

First of all the comparison graph was made by a customer not my self, might not be very accountable as its on a different dyno and different car perhaps I shouldn't put it in here. How ever yours is still the most responsive GT3076R in .82 with pump fuel in the Dynosheet section.

The stronger mid rang might been more boost by I haven't seen your boost curve yet.

I believe even at same boost curve this specific version of ATR43G3 is very likely to beat you in power and torque because its not using a standard size Garrett wheel. which I believe yours is a 76mm 56T 12 blade.

I've built and rebuilt plenty of GT3076s and I know how they behaves on RB25dets. on road this one delivers a noticeable stronger punch but not as smooth. I can modify GT307x to do the same or modify the ATR43G3 to match what you've got.

Plus you should mention that you are running a special valve for response increasement. Without it yours is just ordinary.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/po...181-loadimg.JPG

Please post all your reply in my development thread. I didn’t meant or expect to hijack this thread. Thanks

Looks horribly laggy, even on a dyno it isn't hitting full boost until 5000rpm, what is it like on the road in 1st and 2nd, nothing nothing then it just smashes the limiter getting no traction?

Still it is a fair effort for the 20, would be good for burnouts and drags, don't reckon it'd go too well on the track though.

Looks horribly laggy, even on a dyno it isn't hitting full boost until 5000rpm, what is it like on the road in 1st and 2nd, nothing nothing then it just smashes the limiter getting no traction?

Still it is a fair effort for the 20, would be good for burnouts and drags, don't reckon it'd go too well on the track though.

Full boost is about 4700rpm in 4th...

Starts to move at 4000 and giddys up by 4500!

Been on to a motorkana already, it's fine apart from really tight stuff (helps with good suspension, dont have to slow down as much :cool: )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...