Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

interesting what ppl recommend for oil....

ive noticed since switching to full synthetic valvoline syn power i have better oil pressure, according to the stock gauge....

cold start its showing more oil pressure and when hot its never goes below the 2 mark....

the oil weights i use always been the same.... is this normal?

  • 3 weeks later...
iv never hurd of it.. where can you buy it from?

thats pretty interesting. no oil leaks or blow by in my RB25.. so basically stick to a 5w-40 10w-40max.. just wondering tho australian temps are alot hotter then say Europe wouldnt this mean the higher hot rating would be better? not so much the cold rateing.. i have seen my oil temps at 120c before on track..

i might check out some Mobil Synthetic S 10W 40 seems cheaper then turbo light same temp rating. and Mobil one is European to isnt it? so im guessing its over 75%?

Buy a top quality synthetic. Work out which is the right viscosity for your car so that it doesn't overheat ( or get an oil cooler if necessary) and stop changing it so often. It will be good for at least 20,000km. Change your filter more often than that if you want.
ive switched over to the Penrite 10-40w, its a semi synth, will defiantly be using again for my next oil change. Price was about $45

Get onto the Penrite website and compare their tables of spec's for the oils they produce - viscosity at different temps varies enormously. I personally would only ever use Penrite Sin 0 or Sin 5 if running the car on the track, it was excellent in my modified R33 - ran cool and sweet and the oil level remained constant between changes. This was after I twice broke oil rings while using Mobil 1.

I did try Sin 10w-70 in my Stagea S2 but found that on cold mornings the high viscosity made a couple of lifters sticky for the first few seconds. I've since also discovered that Penrite recommends Sin 0 for R34 RB25DET Neo engines, including for track use.

Just ordered 5L of royal purple 5W40 for the soup - Harold @ Performance Hub, cant recommend enough!

That lab test done by Street Commodores mag back in March 2006 had Royal Purple and Penrite Sin 5w-60 on their own at the top of the 18 oils tested, with virtually identical results, way ahead of any other brand tested. The Penrite, however, costs half as much.

Yeah, and the mag got shot down for incorrect testing procedures....

I've always put royal purple in all my cars, all have run brilliantly, so why change for the sake of $40 or so?

I'm a brand whore.

Edited by Ten Four
Yeah, and the mag got shot down for incorrect testing procedures....

I've always put royal purple in all my cars, all have run brilliantly, so why change for the sake of $40 or so?

I'm a brand whore.

No, I checked, the oil companies whose oils didn't do so well complained that there weren't enough tests to cover all the different attributes an oil may have - the tests that they did do were fine in themselves - nothing wrong with the methodology and the mag still stands by validity of the results. It's up to the individual to draw their own conclusions. For me the most critical one was the scar produced on the side of the roller bearing when the oil film broke. I can readily relate that one to engine wear!

"My name is Roger Miller. I do work for Red Line Oil in Victoria. One of my clients passed on your enquiry. In a rough sense this test is used for grease not oil. It is like using a quarter mile drag strip to find the "best four wheel drive on the market." A real test but totally irrelevent to what happens in the real world.The addition of friction modifiers to the test bears this out. You can take the nastiest oil on the market, add friction modifier to it and it will out-perform the best oil on the market. If you add friction modifier to a GL1 oil in this falex test you can make it exceed the results for a GL5 oil. Most general use oils contain friction modifiers to a greater or lesser degree depending on the recipe the oil manufacturer is using that particular day. So what does the falex test really test...??? "

Meh, I like my RP

another vote for performanceclub.com - unbeatable prices and service from Harold. Get your good oils from him, faster than trying to track it down from local autohabibs franchise and less bull.

No, I checked, the oil companies whose oils didn't do so well complained that there weren't enough tests to cover all the different attributes an oil may have - the tests that they did do were fine in themselves - nothing wrong with the methodology and the mag still stands by validity of the results. It's up to the individual to draw their own conclusions. For me the most critical one was the scar produced on the side of the roller bearing when the oil film broke. I can readily relate that one to engine wear!

Oh I guess using a test that was designed for heavy liquids such as grease, and sometimes gear oils, not engine oils. It pisses me off that people are still reading that stupid street commodores test.

This quote by a Red Line rep sums it up about that Timken test (http://forums.noria.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/616604995/m/8381065241):

"You can take the nastiest oil on the market, add friction modifier to it and it will out-perform the best oil on the market. If you add friction modifier to a GL1 oil in this falex test you can make it exceed the results for a GL5 oil. Most general use oils contain friction modifiers to a greater or lesser degree depending on the recipe the oil manufacturer is using that particular day."

Buy a top quality synthetic. Work out which is the right viscosity for your car so that it doesn't overheat ( or get an oil cooler if necessary) and stop changing it so often. It will be good for at least 20,000km. Change your filter more often than that if you want.

Even for a group 5 synthetic, 20,000km is really stretching it...you'd want them to be an awful lot of country km...

Oh I guess using a test that was designed for heavy liquids such as grease, and sometimes gear oils, not engine oils. It pisses me off that people are still reading that stupid street commodores test.

This quote by a Red Line rep sums it up about that Timken test (http://forums.noria.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/616604995/m/8381065241):

"You can take the nastiest oil on the market, add friction modifier to it and it will out-perform the best oil on the market. If you add friction modifier to a GL1 oil in this falex test you can make it exceed the results for a GL5 oil. Most general use oils contain friction modifiers to a greater or lesser degree depending on the recipe the oil manufacturer is using that particular day."

It's certainly true that you can add a friction modifier to a motor oil then do the test with the lever loading up the bearing and get a much better result. My mate's dad was a Wynn's Friction Proofing rep and I saw him do this "test" many times.

In the SC mag article that so offends you, the oils were tested as they came out of the manufacturer's container; it's not like a friction modifier was added for the test, so what are you saying? Is it that the oils that come with a friction modifier are somehow a spurious and misleading product? I suspect that the quantity of friction modifier in those various oils is far from constant, so do you feel that only the ones with a minimal amount are worth considering?

As I don't have any engineering qualifications, I'm puzzled as to why it would piss you off so much that anyone might place credence in this same test by SC mag. The results were pretty graphic - what was wrong about them? Can you suggest a more valid one by which the relative capabilities of engine oils might be compared? If you want to ignore the SC mag test, all we have is anecdotal, or worse, purely subjective evidence. I'd like to hear what information you use to form your opinions about different oils.

So much of this has been covered in the oils thread.

Magnatec 10w 40

30 bucks a bottle with a filter!

Don't use magnatec unless you want to test whether you can hear/feel the difference between a good oil and a bad one. I decided to use some cheap oil for a quick 1000km flush of my engine a while ago and changed after like 800km I hated it so much. The engine didn't like to rev and sounded like shit. Replaced it with some nulon "fully synthetic" I had left over and everything felt much better.

interesting what ppl recommend for oil....

ive noticed since switching to full synthetic valvoline syn power i have better oil pressure, according to the stock gauge....

cold start its showing more oil pressure and when hot its never goes below the 2 mark....

the oil weights i use always been the same.... is this normal?

Yes. The stock oil pressure gauge us pretty sh!t, but I have the same numbers you do. It all makes sense mate, the thicker the oil the more pressure the pump is putting on it in the attempt to squeeze it through the filter. As it gets thinner, the pressure goes down and the flowrate goes up.

If you want to do what most people on here swear by, get an oil that is 10w40, or 5w40, and fully synthetic (or a good semi if you change it every 5000km and don't have too many mods).

Sougi is the flavour at the moment because it's really cheap, ~$60 for 5L, and it's grade V fully synthetic, which means it'll happily last 10000km. It's the same grade as motul 300v for half the price. They also do a very good semi-synth using a mix of grades III and V for ~$30 for 5L.

Sougi is no longer being made but there is lots left over. I personally like sougi but when it runs out, and if there's no alternative, I'll be using 8100 xcess or royal purple.

It's certainly true that you can add a friction modifier to a motor oil then do the test with the lever loading up the bearing and get a much better result. My mate's dad was a Wynn's Friction Proofing rep and I saw him do this "test" many times.

In the SC mag article that so offends you, the oils were tested as they came out of the manufacturer's container; it's not like a friction modifier was added for the test, so what are you saying? Is it that the oils that come with a friction modifier are somehow a spurious and misleading product? I suspect that the quantity of friction modifier in those various oils is far from constant, so do you feel that only the ones with a minimal amount are worth considering?

As I don't have any engineering qualifications, I'm puzzled as to why it would piss you off so much that anyone might place credence in this same test by SC mag. The results were pretty graphic - what was wrong about them? Can you suggest a more valid one by which the relative capabilities of engine oils might be compared? If you want to ignore the SC mag test, all we have is anecdotal, or worse, purely subjective evidence. I'd like to hear what information you use to form your opinions about different oils.

All SC tests prove is, if I ever run out of grease, I can turn to a bottle of royal purple to grease up my garage door.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers)
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
    • OK, Step 3, if you need to remove the valve body, either to replace it, the TCM, or to do a more complete drain.  First, you need to disconnect the TCM input wires, they are about half way up the transmission on the drivers side. One plug and the wires are out of the way, but there is also a spring clip that stops the socket from sliding back into the transmission. On my car the spring clip was easy to get, but the socket was really stuck in the o-ring of the transmission housing and took some.....persuasion. You can see both the plug to remove (first) and the spring clip (second) in this pic Incidentally, right next to the plug, you can see where the casting has allowance for a dispstick/filler which Nissan decided not to provide. there is a cap held on with a 6mm head bolt that you can remove to overfill it (AMS recommend a 1.5l overfill). Final step before the big mess, remove the speed sensor that is clipped to the valve body at the rear of the box.  Then removal of the Valve Body. For this the USDM Q50 workshop manual has a critical diagram: There are a billion bolts visible. Almost all of them do not need to be removed, just the 14 shown on the diagram. Even so, I both removed one extra, and didn't check which length bolt came from which location (more on that later....). Again it is worth undoing the 4 corners first, but leaving them a couple of turns in to hold the unit up....gravity is not your friend here and trans oil will be going everywhere. Once the corners are loose but still in remove all the other 10 bolts, then hold the valve body up with 1 hand while removing the final 4. Then, everything just comes free easily, or like in my case you start swearing because that plug is stuck in the casing. Done, the valve body and TCM are out
    • OK, so if you are either going for the bigger fluid change or are changing the valve body which includes the Transmission Control Module (TCM), first you should have both a new gasket 31397-1XJ0A and a torque wrench that can work down to 8Nm (very low, probably a 1/4 drive one). You can probably get by without either, but I really didn't want to pull it all apart together due to a leak. First, you now need that big oil pan. The transmission pan is 450 long x 350 wide, and it will probably leak on all sides, so get ready for a mess. There are 24x 6mm headed bolts holding the pan on. I undid the 2 rear corners, then screwed those bolts back in a couple of turns to let the pan go low at that end, then removed all the middle bolts on each side. Then, undo the front corner bolts slowly while holding the pan up, and 80% of the fluid will head out the rear. From there, remove the remaining bolts and the pan is off. You can see it is still dripping oil absolutely everywhere...it dripped all night.... I got another couple of litres when I removed the pan, and then another few when I removed the valve body - all up another 4l on top of the 3 already dropped in step 1.
×
×
  • Create New...