Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Beer Baron, I didnt think they would cost that much. My budget is around the $65k mark, although for something as clean as the first one I could maybe budge a little. Dont think I could justify spending that much on a GTR. Do you know any other sites to visit where I can find some nice cars for import?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Todd and Yumi (Edit* via Kristian) have a nice VS I (not VS II though, that you were asking about), coming in next month + warranty.

From Nara prefecture, no rust, no damage, modified 550ps, white, full service history.

With RAWS requiring virtually stock standard cars to be signed off, how does one get these more modified examples through without major time invested (assuming you can source stock parts).

Someone somewhere is fudging something!

IMO, a modded car ex Japland may appear value, but certainly not if you need to go to hell and back to have it complied correctly, as a friend who recently bought a 34R in and had to swap out (and find first!) a standard 34R dash because his had gauges inset into it. The cost of such works ads up quite quickly..... and you still haven't seen or driven it to actually know if its a good one!? lol

^^^^get a load of THIS guy!

haha nah just tricking...

it's a bit of a catch22 (i think that's the saying?)

cars have to be brought back to standard for compliance...

...yes and "no"

yes - it is a federal requirement to return the cars back to stock for compliance, however once the car "passes" compliance - it gets very hard to "chase it up" for the authorities...

so in a sense... the most viable time that authorities can "police" the RAWS (not revs - revs = pre 2005) the RAWS is BEFORE compliance is passed..

while it's in their shop...

crazy, right? any worker with half a brain would say so what, it's a work in progress.

i mean to say no modified cars can be imported.. is a load of pap.

im sure someone's going to get up me for saying this - but it's entirely up to the RAWS owner and how much money they want to make off their customer.

the RAWS owner is the one that "passes it"

there is no "government inspector" that comes down to the shop n check every car that goes through...

they are bestowed delegated authority to make the call themselves.

the onus is on them and them only to say "yeah okay" or "naaaaaah think i might need to take the bodykit off aye, yeeeeeaaaah gunna be 3 days labour for that aye"

they can "pass" it in whatever form they deem necessary. the only reason that they would make someone install a dash is because they RAWS owner feels like getting his wife a new flatscreen TV. and has to find a way to pay for it.

they can comply it "modified" and nobody would be any the wiser - if authorities come back to him for mods, he can simply push the blame onto the owner of the car n say "wasn't me"

the way they make the customer cough up the cash is...

usually they do the work before they ask.

and when you blast them for your 4 grand invoice - they often give you a ten minute rant about "litigation" and "sueing" and "malpractice" and try to pretend like they know what they're talking about. this intimidates the customer. and they pay it.

forgive the rant. i know it has nothing to do with GTR's... but to say that only "non modded" cars can come in is a load of scat. it is a rule that can't REALLY be policed and is perpetuated by whoever wants to perpetuate it... which is usually those who have something to gain from "returning a car to stock"

on topic - importing a GTR won't necessarilly save you money... but it MAY mean you'll get a nicer car... you never know - there are enthusiasts who DONT thrash their car in every walk of life.

take my soarer for instance, cost me a lot more to import. but the money isn't an issue when you get a mint car with service history and millions of yen worth of name brand mods :)

Edited by Mr Eps

it actually can be policed very easily. say a compliance shop gets a modified car and the customer begs them not to return it to standard as they can't afford it. workshop says ok, they then submit the car to DOTARS online as complied, at this point the car is supposed to be completed and awaiting it's compliance plate to arrive at the workshop. this is the point at which DOTARS will initiate a spot check and they give only 24hrs notice. so no a workshop cannot say 'it's a work in progress' as they have already submitted the car as completed. so if DOTARS arrive to find it not as it's supposed to be it's a big problem for any workshop that would do that. this is why most (should be all) workshops will insist on returning vehicles to standard as it's their business at risk. I would strongly suggest anyone wanting to import a modified car talk to you compliance workshop BEFORE you buy it and ask them what exactly will be involved and what kind of costs you are looking at. that way you can decide up front if it's viable or not. :)

^^^ it seems i was misfed information in the rant i got given!

that makes a lot more sense what you said... when i was being told it i was like "that makes no sense"

but yes - that's sterling advice :)

it actually can be policed very easily. say a compliance shop gets a modified car and the customer begs them not to return it to standard as they can't afford it. workshop says ok, they then submit the car to DOTARS online as complied, at this point the car is supposed to be completed and awaiting it's compliance plate to arrive at the workshop. this is the point at which DOTARS will initiate a spot check and they give only 24hrs notice. so no a workshop cannot say 'it's a work in progress' as they have already submitted the car as completed. so if DOTARS arrive to find it not as it's supposed to be it's a big problem for any workshop that would do that. this is why most (should be all) workshops will insist on returning vehicles to standard as it's their business at risk. I would strongly suggest anyone wanting to import a modified car talk to you compliance workshop BEFORE you buy it and ask them what exactly will be involved and what kind of costs you are looking at. that way you can decide up front if it's viable or not. :)

^^^ this man..

speaketh the trooth... :P

marlin,

I know the car you are talking about as well. it was me that pulled the dash on it well after the RAW did it.

i'm pretty sure they /have/ to give you SOME form of notice...

..not trying to sound cocky when i speak like that but im just saying i highly doubt they're allowed to "rock up" like that...?

on every random inspection I have ever had they just rock up with no notice .

on my last sample car the inspector told me an amusing story where they did another sample car inspection , finished a little early , had some time to kill so wen't back to the same workshop to do a random inspection on a different car

surprise!

they do the same here as well. I know of a few shops that before all this came to a head would let me grab a car - do what I needed to (usually an alarm or similar.) and return it to them., now its a entirely differnt matter. they will rock up and inspect at will.

If inspectors are turning up without notice, then I suggest workshops join the RAWS association and kick up a stink about it - inspectors are meant to give 2 days notice if workshops have not had any prior infringements. Even when workshops have been put through the ringer, they should get 2 hours' notice.

cuts both ways I guess, as long as the inspection itself does not impede on the company's ability to continue working then as the autoworx guy says random 'no notice' inspections won't hurt (although it's probably annoying).

If you're being targeted and it interrupts your ability to do your job then that's when a workshop should complain.

we have no problem with them turning up whenever they want as we have nothing to hide .

as a long term member of the raws association I would encourage MORE random inspections with no notice.

Yeah agree with that to a point. Like you say if you're doing the right thing inspections are not a problem. Once a cars submitted it should be all fine so there is no excuse for failing. but some workshops who are space limited will have cars stored at another site etc so it makes sense to give some notice to save wasting dotars time and taxpayers money.

Anyway at least you've proven what I was saying. People think it's a free for all but anyone thinking they can get away with sub par compliance is living on borrowed time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...