Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am looking at getting a lap timer for the GTR for trackdays, sprints etc - I get sick of waiting for the official times to be posted, often hours/days after the actual lap, and so its difficult to feedback into improving times. I'm not a pro racer or anything but have recently become OCD about shaving those hundredths off my PB :down:

I've had a look at the Performance Box and used a borrowed mychron at a recent trackday which are GPS and beacon respectively. I've also tried the "Trackday" iPhone app which on my old 3G was absolutely useless.

I'm leaning towards the mychron, but was wondering what experiences you guys have had with these or any other lap timing devices in the same price range (eg $500-900?). Are they usefully accurate? Are beacon timers more accurate than GPS-based ones? What would you recommend if price is no object? or what's best bang for buck?

(ps yes have used search and found references to the above but nothing definitive)

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/338755-lap-timing-equipment/
Share on other sites

Hi,

I am looking at getting a lap timer for the GTR for trackdays, sprints etc - I get sick of waiting for the official times to be posted, often hours/days after the actual lap, and so its difficult to feedback into improving times. I'm not a pro racer or anything but have recently become OCD about shaving those hundredths off my PB :down:

I've had a look at the Performance Box and used a borrowed mychron at a recent trackday which are GPS and beacon respectively. I've also tried the "Trackday" iPhone app which on my old 3G was absolutely useless.

I'm leaning towards the mychron, but was wondering what experiences you guys have had with these or any other lap timing devices in the same price range (eg $500-900?). Are they usefully accurate? Are beacon timers more accurate than GPS-based ones? What would you recommend if price is no object? or what's best bang for buck?

(ps yes have used search and found references to the above but nothing definitive)

Cheers

Ive been using performance box and has been great so far. Havent even started to undersand all the data logging yet but ill get there.

I will be interested to see what times it spits out compared to the lap time at GSR/EVO time attack this monday.

Ill keep ya posted

Ive been using performance box and has been great so far. Havent even started to undersand all the data logging yet but ill get there.

I will be interested to see what times it spits out compared to the lap time at GSR/EVO time attack this monday.

Ill keep ya posted

cool thanks. I understand the GSR/EVO track timing is done using the mychrons - the one i used was one SAU borrowed from them for the trackday back in April.

i use the performance box, very easy to setup and used.

only problem i found is that to setup splits etc on the lap, you need to drive around the lap and press the button on the box everytime you want a split, which is kind of hard to do if there is aheap of guys racing on the track at the same time.

However once its setup its good to go! you can save the split/track and just load it up everytime you need it.

The new software that comes with it is pretty awesome, i use google map and trace out the local track so it can show you your lines. google map was abit off but you can adjust it with the software.

has lots of features so you can see were your accelerating, braking etc etc

here are some screenshot i took, 1st one is comparing my lap to my friends lap (just put the box in his car and off he went)

laptime.jpg

this is the race line trace on the track

maprr.jpg

I use the mychron just to give me an instant lap time so I know if what I am trying is faster or slower. So far it has been spot on compared to the transponder timing and gives me the instant feedback I am after.

If you are after data and splits etc this obviously isn't for you.

i bought one of these a while back

http://www.xtracing.com/ the one on the left. works great! you can get all software stuff for it aswell.. works off a beacon that you buy separately

used on the kart and on the car

Just noticed they have a new one too.. looks alrite!

Are beacon timers more accurate than GPS-based ones?

definitely. the trigger is in a fixed location physically on the track/pit wall and triggered as the car actually passes it.

GPS timers rely on Points Of Interest for locations on the track (eg start/finish line, splits etc) which in reality will most likely not be recorded exactly on the track, in which case a hypothetical line through the GPS POI is what triggers it. And say your GPS is operating at 1hz, its only updating your GPS position once every second. At my local track I cross the start/finish line at approx 200km/h. In that second where my GPS lap timer needs to stop one lap and start a new lap, I've covered over 55m. So it needs to interpolate those 2 GPS positions and speeds at those points, roughly calculate the acceleration (probably linearly), to work out when you crossed that line perpendicular to the Start/Finish line POI... Having said all that, they can get pretty decent results! But a beacon lap timer is more absolute and accurate. Its not having to do anything except count time and wait to be physically triggered.

If you want cheap, then iphone app is the way to go. I use HarryLapTimer with the Tomtom cradle (on 3GS). Other option is to jailbreak and use a bluetooth GPS. Using an iphone with the internal GPS only is a waste of time, as you found.

i use the performance box, very easy to setup and used.

only problem i found is that to setup splits etc on the lap, you need to drive around the lap and press the button on the box everytime you want a split, which is kind of hard to do if there is aheap of guys racing on the track at the same time.

I've never had this issue, just load which ever track im at and soon as I start driving it automatically starts timing and uses the loaded track data for the splits and start/finish and it displays them everytime I go past that point without touching any buttons.

The split times is brilliant for people like me that are beginner track drivers but wanting to improve. You drive past the first split time and know instantly how you are doing, if you are a second off you know that driving at 110% for the remainder of the lap is going to do anything so you back off a couple of seconds to save the tyres/brakes. The beacon timers give you no info until you cross the start/finish line, infact they give you no info at all, just your actual time. When you get home and analyse your times you cant remember why you did those times because you dont have the data to show you.

As you mentioned the PerformanceBox is really good because of the data it saves to memory card. Just taking a look at the data of my 3 fastest times its amazing how much difference their is in the actual data (corner speeds, corner lines, straight line speed etc) it's all very close yet so far apart (1km/h here and there makes a difference) when you are chasing time.

Don't forget the PerformanceBox is more than just a laptimer, I dont have a speedo in my aussie car so I use it as my speedo, you can buy additional components to record temperatures etc and it does your 1/4 mile times as well.

If you want cheap, then iphone app is the way to go. I use HarryLapTimer with the Tomtom cradle (on 3GS). Other option is to jailbreak and use a bluetooth GPS. Using an iphone with the internal GPS only is a waste of time, as you found.

yeah I tried HarrysLapTimer app for the first time the other weekend just with the built-in GPS. Hopeless.

so it works well for you with the TomTom cradle? If so, I'll have to get one. Even paying $159 for the TomTom cradle still makes it a cheap lap timer.

yeah I tried HarrysLapTimer app for the first time the other weekend just with the built-in GPS. Hopeless.

so it works well for you with the TomTom cradle? If so, I'll have to get one. Even paying $159 for the TomTom cradle still makes it a cheap lap timer.

if it works well it would be pretty cool - the current version introduced video recording and apparently the "next" version will have overlay:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYL4PZsVLC8...layer_embedded#!

pretty neato if the actual GPS function works...

Still don't know - I like all the extra data logging and mapping stuff that comes with the performancebox over the mychron, although it's all totally unnecessary so is knowing the lap time, so might as well!

Will do some more research on the HarrysLapTimer option with a GPS cradle...

I use an old MyChron with a beacon. I like it. A friend of mine has a new with track mapping, the whole shooting match, dash and all. He has found it very helpfull to overlay laps with different with different setups to compare and see how they compare. I like it too. Might get 1....1day.

i've used a few different lap timers, including the beacon style and GPS timers, over many many track days. nothing comes close to the GPS variety for convenience and analysis. looking at real-world results (dorian vs beacons vs GPS) for my money there is nothing in it (in terms of accruacy), maybe a tenth here and there). get a GPS timer, they are great. can't tell you how many times i've left a beacon at the track, or had one stolen.

yeah I tried HarrysLapTimer app for the first time the other weekend just with the built-in GPS. Hopeless.

so it works well for you with the TomTom cradle? If so, I'll have to get one. Even paying $159 for the TomTom cradle still makes it a cheap lap timer.

Works for me no problems at all. I didnt have a satnav so the cradle has a dual use for me. I have also used racechrono with a nokia bluetooth GPS before i got the iphone and it worked well, but was less convenient.

Also, GPS based means you can get speeds/cornering Gs etc that you cant get from a beacon.

hard to go past a $150 nokia mobile, $100 5hz gps and racechrono.

you can export the data into vbox format then look at it through performance tools.

put it inside the car so you can see it, flashes red or green on the screen through the sectors so you know

if youre going quicker.

through it in mates cars as well.

see Brendan's videos, he has it attached to the steering wheel.

Works for me no problems at all. I didnt have a satnav so the cradle has a dual use for me. I have also used racechrono with a nokia bluetooth GPS before i got the iphone and it worked well, but was less convenient.

Also, GPS based means you can get speeds/cornering Gs etc that you cant get from a beacon.

cool. I'll give it another go. Thanks Stabby :laugh:

hard to go past a $150 nokia mobile, $100 5hz gps and racechrono.

you can export the data into vbox format then look at it through performance tools.

put it inside the car so you can see it, flashes red or green on the screen through the sectors so you know

if youre going quicker.

through it in mates cars as well.

see Brendan's videos, he has it attached to the steering wheel.

+1

racechrono is the goods. i have used it for picton kart track before. but no other motorsport.. and a little bit of driving and logging on the street.

depends what you want. if you just want convenient, 100% accurate and reliable times then the beacon based mychron timer is the go. I have a mychron light TG ( it was around $300 from memory) and it does exactly what's advertised. it can also do splits as well with additional beacons (around $50 from memory). it's also super easy to read and easy to use.

http://www.aimsports.com/products/tg/index.html

on the other hand if you think you want to delve further into analysis of your driving then you really need something with more functionality like a drift box/performance box. or even some more logging stuff like vbox pro etc.

in your first post you said you just want quick laptimes as you're sick of waiting for the sheets at track days etc. if that's really the case then the mychron is for you. the other good thing is. they are very popular. at any given track day there will be plenty of mychron beacons on the pitwall. you can just pick one and use that (providing they don't pack up and bail half way through the day! saves putting your own out there if you are worried about forgetting it).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...