Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

afternoon quickie. terrible photoshop. IMG_07272.jpg

Only been in this hobby for 2 months now (forgot to say in earlier post).

take a look at my DeviantArt gallery for all my pics. http://elementle.deviantart.com/gallery/

Edited by alex182

Been busy in meetings and training all day.

D90

80-200mm ED

EXIF

Lambo

1/80

F/16

ISO 100

Focal 105mm

Distance (Guess) approx 40m

Ferrari 1/2 shot

1/200

F/13

ISO100

Focal 200mm

Distance 30m

R35

1/60

No IS or VR, no mono.

hope it helps some how :blink:

You're own black heart owen. Next time i see u with ur mrs I'm gonna tell her you told us all you wanted to cut her back :blink:

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

Been busy in meetings and training all day.

D90

80-200mm ED

EXIF

Lambo

1/80

F/16

ISO 100

Focal 105mm

Distance (Guess) approx 40m

Ferrari 1/2 shot

1/200

F/13

ISO100

Focal 200mm

Distance 30m

R35

1/60

No IS or VR, no mono.

hope it helps some how :blink:

Thanks for that. Thats a decent effort to get the lambo THAT sharp at 1/80 with no IS

You're own black heart owen. Next time i see u with ur mrs I'm gonna tell her you told us all you wanted to cut her back :blink:

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

Haha, she knows how much I hate tattoos :)

(sorry to hijack thread, will take photos this weekend, that's the plan anyhoo)

I missed that sparkler graff shot from jay, it's mad! i like it. I'm plannin on going back to those walls and shooting them all for you when i head past them next time J.

cheers man, i need to get out and do more, but my car has no rego and im pretty slack, lol. and cant wait to see your graff shots. seen some from south sydney that absolutely rock.

and todays effort, lol. self portrait...

67477_1509403648139_1025781561_31174972_1026445_n.jpg

spent so much time trying to get my timing right that i forgot to make sure the ISO wasnt too high. doh! i really should have got the G11 out for this, but seems the Lumix is always my first choice. ive grown to love it, warts and all, haha.

No worries Serg, I got a few decent shots at 1/60 too, but the 80's and lower were sharper and nothing was really gained in the shot.

Jay, Try searching image galleries for 'Newtown' there's so much stuff there.

Owen, Hasn't she shown you her special tat? :blink:

A few more from the Creek, Pit shots this time.

R35 with great plates...

5122482095_8a37e52abc_z.jpg

The getaway car...

5122484175_040beb7401_z.jpg

More of the 430 Scud. This car gave me a hard on. Sounded so damn much like a ..... Ferrari, Tough Ferrari.

5123086142_d06335ac27_z.jpg

5123084840_ac012edac4_z.jpg

5123085272_2d7d1f7650_z.jpg

pr0n matty. So much pr0n.

Wow, i was right with the lambo :P Sif theres no gain by slowing your shutter past 1/80th! Massive gain. Go to 1/40th and you'll see the difference in motion blur and not want to go back to 1/80th :D

Sweet shots everyone!!!!!! Nick, some awesome shots there!

Thanks man, some of those shots were hard to do because I was using the articulated screen to compose them, and trying to hold the camera still while pressing the shutter was a bit awkward

afternoon quickie. terrible photoshop. IMG_07272.jpg

Afternoon quickie? You're doing it wrong!!! :D

Great subject for a photo, but try composing using the "rule of thirds" and you might get a slightly better result. I love the vibrance of the purple.

cheers guys! it was an awesome find :D i was very happy when i saw them running around the track. if only it was like that every day.

i got off a few shots at 1/60 at that location and there wasn't enough detail in the background to warrant the loss of clarity on the car vs 80. there's only grass and water and the extra back blur didn't do much. if there was more in the background it probably woulda been different. I don't think i'd be very successful at 1/40 with no IS. I'll give it a crack next time i head down though. :P Always up for a challenge.

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

Hey Matt thanks for the tips. i agree about the flare this was one of my concerns about the pic. is this something that could be eliminated while taking the photo or something i would fix when editing the photo?

in the second one i tend to agree with you,i think the sky needs a bit more detail, prob the only thing i would change. As im still so new to it all i need to getin the mind set that i can take more then one shot and edit them together to get the best result.

Im still thinking its a point and shoot and that close enough is good enough.

But hey still plenty of time for me to learn.

And once again. thanks for the tips.

John

I like both your shots. good work.

first one, the light flare is a bit to much, i'd either work to reduce or eliminate it.

2nd one is nice too, good spot and great idea! read up on your bracket function. you could have bracketed, or taken a few exposures so you could throw in a bit more detail from the sky.

not really sure why you have the or in there.. they are the same thing - or you mean he could have done the bracketing automatically or manually :P

ps dont think that photo even needs to be bracketed for more detail in the sky - if you want the clouds to be more visible just apply a gradient filter to that photo

Edited by ZENNON

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...