Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately there are very few people around with the time/money to buy both and test them back to back on the same car and dyno. Until there is I guess we'll never know. I've seen both up close off a car before and they're very schmick. I'm curious of the effects the 6boost oval entry into the turbo flange has on a dyno chart. Apparently it increases exhaust speed giving better response but you'd expect it to lessen the flow in the top end?

Now your making me want to sell my 8374. Any chance of seeing a dyno sheet from it? I know the numbers are probably top secret but even if you got rid of the numbers so we could get an idea of the curve.

yep there will be graphs I'm sure. we have agreed to provide the graphs to Borg Warner and Full Race and I'm sure they will want to share them. I don't know if the scale will be intact but I don't see why not. A certain power figure at just 1 point in time one 1 dyno doesn't really give the game away....

Sounds awesome so far- not sure if you are joking about needing a bigger turbo though haha. Have you already maxed it out, and thats the motivation for saying that - or is it just because it spools better than you anticipated so figure a bit more lag for a bit more power would be acceptable?

This turbo is advertised as being able to ~95lb/min of air - if thats accurate, this has the potential to be a 1000hp vehicle... call me conservative, but that might be just about enough for a track car ;)

yes serious about considering a bigger turbo. but we are not nearly finished with this one yet. like TheKeeper said we have not really stretched the legs on this one yet and the thought was pretty much like you said. it's response was so much better than expected that we'd be willing to sacrifice some of that for even more top end. but we'll have to see how much top end it has yet... if it makes a power number that is in kw at the wheels and starts with a 6 then we'll probably be satisfied.

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top. to early to stake my life on such predictions yet but it no longer seems impossible.

Yeah I don't have anything really bad to say about 6boost manifolds. they are a great product. I have recommended them to friends of mine as far back as 5 years ago (or more). I can't say I've tested the same turbo back to back on the same car with a full race vs a 6boost. maybe one day. but I have looked carefully at both. They are both great products but I personally feel the full race is a little more advanced. they are so nicely finished too.

No doubt some of the excellent spool and power you are getting with your turbo combo will have to be attributed to the manifolds, etc. The final product is effectively the sum of the parts used, it may not give the same result with an RPS Exhaust, XS Power exhaust manifold, reground cams and an old Microtech.

well anyone who reckoned the 9180 might be too big was way off...it's way more responsive than the -10s it replaced. getting the car set-up on the dyno at part throttle the thing is coming onto boost in the 3,000-4,000rpm range! my memory is hazy so don't quote me but off the top of my head at 4,000rpm it made 60kw more than the -10s

promising start - we think once you get more time with this turbokit the last thing youll worry about is pulling it off for another :thumbsup:

Great news Richard. We knew you'd like the performance. We've seen in person that it's not hype, but ultimately want the guys in the trenches to show the rest of the community just how impressive these turbos are...thanks for the props, we do our best to make a product you'll never have to replace.

^^^^^ +1

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top.

agreed - after we finished the twin turbo EFR6258 skyline in the US i started to reconsider my personal cars' turbo setup. My car is LHD so its much more difficult to fit the twins, however I consider the boost response and linearity of the twin 6258 powerband as phenomenal, so I am particularly eager to hear your impressions compared to all the twins youve run over the years. we have a steady supply of the smaller EFR's from borg warner so if i went twins i could potentially put my car back together quickly...

seriously though, don't comment too much on Full race gear till you've seen it in the flesh. it's hard to capture properly in pics just how nice it is.

thanks for the vote of confidence, that means a lot coming from a seasoned pro such as yourself. Everyone on our team at Full-Race works *hard* to put out a top-shelf product .. anybody that claims to top us in quality or design better have their act together because we do and its not easy!

I would suggest something around 280 10.5mm if it's a track car. the thing is lots of the jap cams are a bit too big on duration and too small on lift to enable them to be bolt in cams.

totally agree with you - 280 x 10.5 or 280 x 11.5 is a great cam. I personally prefer to have solid boost response by ~3500-3700rpm so for my driving style and 2.6L displacement the 8374 is preferred. For anyone with an Rb30 and an aggressive trans like you guys have the 9180 is clearly the monster.

going by the results I've heard of the 67mm S400SX turbos doing - the compressor wheel is probably capable of pretty serious things, all comes down to how much exhaust gas the 80mm turbine can do. I'm picking that if the cam specs thrown around are at all relevant to this setup, its capable of quite happily cracking 600kw on a hubdyno running E85.

we recently tested a 1.9L honda on the BW S400SX 67mm, which as you mention uses a similar design compressor wheel to the EFR 9180 but with the 83mm inconel turbine wheel for max exhaust flow and power, designed primarily as a drag racing 67mm not so much focused on spoolup/response. on a 1.9L honda engine, 31psi boost and E85 race fuel we saw 950hp on a dynapack hubdyno. does not spool nearly as well as the efr of course

not a chance.

:cheers:

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

Which model?

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible.

Why did they ditch the twins?

Sounds like it was a good idea by that initial report - when is tuning likely to be completed?

A decent single twin scroll turbo is the main thing that has been missing from that car's setup which has managed to have it not holding a special place in my "Man that this is so cool I wish I had one just like it" list :)

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

Sounds like the plot to a cheesy American fighting movie! Hahaha!

not a chance.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

I think you may want to re-read that post, because if you wrote it correctly it means you really have NO IDEA what you're talking about. If, somehow you got the names confused.... you're forgiven, we all make mistakes.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...