Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

here is one of the first 7163 results for the EWG vband housings. its an R35 GTR with 4.1L engine built entirely by SubZero (FR just helped with the turbos). timeslip attached -- watch the launch

post-28839-0-98429100-1389660704_thumb.jpg

EFRs look like great things but fitting long IWG versions to competition cars isn't the same as production ones - particularly if you don't want it to look obviously modified .

A

This sumbich got to fit 2 IWG efrs!!

post-52684-0-37747800-1389735047_thumb.jpg

post-52684-0-00920100-1389735109_thumb.jpg

Edited by NismoSTune

I don't know much other than they are the smallest EFRs and appear flow more on paper than the 8374 if they were truly 1+1 which isn't realistic.

Not sure if the guy frequents this site. PPG helical dog, tomei stroker I know for sure. Tomei poncams but unsure of size.

  • 5 weeks later...

That should shorten it nicely, and external gate specific, the way I like it. :)

I wonder if they plan to do split pulse Vband entry... That would be very trick.

Yup!!

Because I would LOVE to fit a 8374 to my car, but unfortunatly the turbo is too bulky... :(

Yeah that appears to be a problem with some of these EFRs . I can see Geoff and a few others thinking we get these TS IWG turbos to the masses and they want to bitch about packaging . I know they tried really hard to make these things work really well but I ah wonder if a bit more compromise with packaging would be a bit more acceptable to the fast road market . Shortening up those long IW T housings has to affect waste gate performance but would a little less still be streets ahead of the turbocharger competition ?

Hard to please everyone I know cheers A .

^ To be honest, I even have troubles with the EWG versions on evos...

Low mount the turbo dump pipe is too restrictive IMO, and top mount looks like ass.... (not to mention changes the weight distribution of road/race car).

tonba -- man up.. its not that hard to fit these in an evo, especially if you take the a/c out

discopotato - more often than not, the location and bracket for the actuator is the difficult piece to fit- not the length of the turbo. Full-Race has a few different WG brackets to suit many different fitments, that is the real key to making these work, knowing where to position the actuator in each application

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

^ come on Geoff..

These turbos are an engineers wet dream. But unfortunately, I haven't seen any real world results to show how effective they are. Sure, you have posted results, there are sierra sierra, nemo evo and tilton, but no real world stuff.

My car has A/C, its a street car, and it gets f**king hot in Australia so there is no way I'm getting rid of it. (Its not a race car)

I have seen some really restrictive downpipe designs to try and make these turbo fit in low-mount config. Which to me, kills off the gains that could be obtained. Not to mention having to notch engine mounts. Pain in the butt to fit. :(

I wonder if forward facing is an option? In that case, What I worry about, is running a small radiator..

Ahhhh, Ill find the perfect setup for me one day...

For now, my old FP Black will have to do..

Edited by Tonba

^ come on Geoff..These turbos are an engineers wet dream. But unfortunately, I haven't seen any real world results to show how effective they are. Sure, you have posted results, there are sierra sierra, nemo evo and tilton, but no real world stuff.My car has A/C, its a street car, and it gets f**king hot in Australia so there is no way I'm getting rid of it. (Its not a race car)I have seen some really restrictive downpipe designs to try and make these turbo fit in low-mount config. Which to me, kills off the gains that could be obtained. Not to mention having to notch engine mounts. Pain in the butt to fit. :(I wonder if forward facing is an option? In that case, What I worry about, is running a small radiator..Ahhhh, Ill find the perfect setup for me one day...For now, my old FP Black will have to do..

Geoff has a 8374 0.92iwg in his Evo road car.......yeah it gets hot in Aussie, but it's just as hot if not hotter where he lives in Phoenix AZ!

I'm sure he will send you some specs if you ask.

Thanks mate.

I know and understand he runs that turbo. Been following it for a while. As I stated before, top mount just wouldn't work for me, especially if Im interested in more power (Ie 9180.

It still doesn't get around the fact it is a turbo with awkward and inconvenient packaging. I might just have to stick with a Forced Performance turbo, unless there are future options for different compressor / turbine housings...

You guys with your RB's are lucky, as you have much more room over us Evo owners...

Edited by Tonba

You guys with your RB's are lucky, as you have much more room over us Evo owners...

This^^

One thing I haven't found yet is the suggested maximum angle of inclination. It would be much easier to fit if you could angle the sucker on a 45 degree in some situations, but obviously the drain would be compromised. What is the maximum angle you would suggest Geoff? Taking into account the car will be driving up hills also. :P

I am running my gtx on a 15 degree angle, leaning back in the engine bay to help with packaging on the VQ25det, and it works fine. But there would be a limit...

Does that take into account driving up a hill though? 20* plus say a 30* hill = 50 degrees... Bring on ceramic bearings that don't need lubrication, then we could vertically mount them. :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...