Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

+1 for 9:1 static comp. I have just had my engine built with 9.2 aries pistons but the nice big mls head gasket brought it back to pretty much 9:1. Isnt half the reason for switching to 3 litre to gain some down low driveability??? I know obviously the extra exhaust gas brings on early spool and you have the increased torque as displacment grows to name other benefits buts whats the point in adding extra displacement and then lowering the compression. One gives u low rpm drivability and the other hinders it. nothing wrong with the 9:1 cr that rb25 have to start with. Especially for a car with regular street duties.

My 2c

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd pay big money to get even more response and more torque..

Like the everybody has already said, the RB25 has 9:1 comp, It makes no sense to spend

good money to build and fit a 3L to REMOVE response?

That poor dude needs to get out of his shed a little more often.

(Lots of honda drivers add turbo's without decompressing their hi-comp engines.)

Hey Guys,

Thanks for keeping my old thread running, fwiw I still haven't got my sh1t together and taken the plunge into dirty 30 land yet but the the car is half stripped out and I am still trying to make up my mind on wether to go the 30 or just stick with the 25 and chuck a 2835 pro s kit at it for a nice 280 odd killer wasps.

I have decided to not go with the original person that wanted to build the 8:1 cr and have been shooting emails to RIPS and they have suggested a pretty nice sounding package for the power I am looking at achieving (<350rwkw) using one of thier special non-forged bottom ends which they assure me is good for 650 odd hp so I am considering this.

Xmas cleaned me out a bit and I bought a nice interior so I'll have to wait a month or two to make the move...............spend 5k on the 30 bottom end or 5k on the2835 pro s, decisions decisions decisions

there are pros and cons for both options

I'll look through the emails when I get back home tomorrow night and let you know, I do remember him saying that 330rwkw would be fine with his proposed setup (with proper tuning etc etc)

It's not a totally "standard" bottom end so to speak, it has a few mods that I can't remember off the top of my head but dosent run forged pistons

sounds like the 1st block listed here, doesnt have much details but says stock internals. so 1 must assume stock pistons, which would mean ~8.3:1.

http://www.ripsracing.com/products.html

would be 600-650hp at the flywheel

Stay above 8.5:1 at least mate. We're in 2011 now. Its a no brainer. I had no issues in my rb25 running a factory 9:1, so why would issues in a rb30 running 9:1 come up? You're building s better more refined motor ( ported, deburred, etc) so you're actually improving your motors ability to prevent detonation.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...