Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

One thing I have noticed between RB's and JZ's is that the JZs always seem to require a few more (2-3) psi to make the same power (with stock intake manifolds) and identical turbos. Now whether that is to do with the standard intake plenums or the intake ports or the factory cams, I am not sure, but I notice it all the time, mainly when comparing 1JZ's to RB25s, I know that JZ's really wake up with aftermarket cams, so that would be my guess.

Glad someone else thought that, I've been burnt by suggesting that around JZ folks before so decided to assume that'd be the case here. JZs do seem to have more midrange though. A dyno plot would be very interesting to see.

A lad on Skylinesdownunder (NZ Skyline website) is getting his RB30DET GTSt tuned with a 1.06a/r GT3076R shortly on a hub dyno, that should be interesting.

http://www.skylinesdownunder.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=59213

I honestly thing the issue here is the turbine AR.

I dare say going up in AR would make for a faster accelerating car, despite the fact the boost would come on slower. You would see the power roll on better.

Go for the 1.06 and a gate off the housing and I think you will be find yourself a massive upgrade.

just because a turbo can be 'Forced' by ways of crude modifications to hold boost, isnt nessasarily a good thing!

both I and a mate have trialed a couple of hypergear turbos on our car, both sets of turbos on both sets of cars had lots of trouble holding boost, by ways of blocking off/restricting the wastegate hole via a retro fitted modification the turbos were made to hold boost 'fairly well' and yet no more power was achieved as the modification mearly forced the turbo to do something it didnt want to do, creating excessive heat, high exhaust manifold pressure, and in turn hot valves, and detonation

just because you can modify a turbo to un naturally hold boost, doesnt mean it is a good thing for either the engine or the turbo?

and unfortunatly alot of people don't understand this, are only interested in the basic figures, like "how much boost" and "how much power"

just because a turbo can be 'Forced' by ways of crude modifications to hold boost, isnt nessasarily a good thing!

both I and a mate have trialed a couple of hypergear turbos on our car, both sets of turbos on both sets of cars had lots of trouble holding boost, by ways of blocking off/restricting the wastegate hole via a retro fitted modification the turbos were made to hold boost 'fairly well' and yet no more power was achieved as the modification mearly forced the turbo to do something it didnt want to do, creating excessive heat, high exhaust manifold pressure, and in turn hot valves, and detonation

just because you can modify a turbo to un naturally hold boost, doesnt mean it is a good thing for either the engine or the turbo?

and unfortunatly alot of people don't understand this, are only interested in the basic figures, like "how much boost" and "how much power"

Finally someone who thinks the same.

Its dropping boost for a reason, jamming it shut has got to be the most backyard thing I have ever seen.

Ok hypergear...point taken...i'm tired of arguing with you...lets agree to disagree... and leave it at that...

Scotty nm35...yup...you're right...no dodgy dip at the changeover point too....

ive upgraded fmo my garret 3071R to a hypergear atr43 g3

Finally someone who thinks the same.

Its dropping boost for a reason, jamming it shut has got to be the most backyard thing I have ever seen.

Its good theory and it works

Finally someone who thinks the same.

Its dropping boost for a reason, jamming it shut has got to be the most backyard thing I have ever seen.

Technically a spring in either a internal gate actuator or a external gate is always jamming it shut when the set boost level isn't achieved...

Are they backyard?

Nope, because that is what is suppose to hold the gate shut.

Resricting its movement so that incase of cold whether or a bit of extra load etc it overboosts and pings it nut off and kills a motor, is what I call back yard. Just another potential engine killer from the way I see it.

Sure it may work ok now, but havent really been tested for a long period, even still you will never see one on my car.

Technically a spring in either a internal gate actuator or a external gate is always jamming it shut when the set boost level isn't achieved...

Are they backyard?

well no its not, because

a. they are usually rated to the turbo's capability that they come fitted on

b. the gate is not restricted in motion (eg if the desired pressure is reached, the gate is completly free to funtion as normal (as aposed to having a screw behind it physically blocking it from opening)

c. the wastegate port hole is also free to flow air once preset pressure is achieved, so that all exces air can vent, unlike another "modification method of screwing down bolts to block flow out from the wastegate hole

therefor the wastegate actuator spring idea is not backyard, however i believe the other methods states in the later parts of b. and c. are 'backyard'

this is why i always say i would like to see tests on the turbo's using these other forms of "boost control" performed such as exhaust gas temp tests, and exhaust manifold pressure tests also! as it's not just about boost and power... its about the otehr detremental things happening to your engine through poor modifications made to turbo's in order to force them to hold boost

Weren't you saying you got a GT3076R a few weeks ago?

plan scrapped. I ended up picking the right turbo for the job

If it was a genuine 5 bolt un cropped garrett gt3071r, you sir are a fool!

ease up. it had a nissan 6 bolt rear on it =[

I thought the screw in "wastegate controller" merely restricted the exhaust gasses before the gate, so that exhaust pressure had less to play in boost drop as it wasn't forcing the gate open as much...would have the same effect on backpressure through the exhaust housing and manifold as it would without the screws but with the wastegate holding itself where it needs to be.

I thought the screw in "wastegate controller" merely restricted the exhaust gasses before the gate, so that exhaust pressure had less to play in boost drop as it wasn't forcing the gate open as much...would have the same effect on backpressure through the exhaust housing and manifold as it would without the screws but with the wastegate holding itself where it needs to be.

if the exhaust manifold pressures are so high that the wastegate is being forced open.. you've got a massive restriction that you'd wanna do something about

as you know a turbo makes boost 'virtually' exponentially, so the wastegate is a vent before the turbine wheel to relieve pressure to 'regulate' boost being made by the turbo, if you physically block (even partially) that 'vent hole' then it forces more air through the turbine wheel, if your already at the turbo's upper flow rate limits, then you can only imagine what stress this is putting on the turbo, not to mention unstable conditions like boost spiking, its not just the turbo that you have to worry about, excess boost, and air that cannot be exhausted will generate high exhaust manifold pressures, which generates high temps, which 'COULD' cause knock conditions and damage to rings, valves, manifolds etc

if the exhaust manifold pressures are so high that the wastegate is being forced open.. you've got a massive restriction that you'd wanna do something about

as you know a turbo makes boost 'virtually' exponentially, so the wastegate is a vent before the turbine wheel to relieve pressure to 'regulate' boost being made by the turbo, if you physically block (even partially) that 'vent hole' then it forces more air through the turbine wheel, if your already at the turbo's upper flow rate limits, then you can only imagine what stress this is putting on the turbo, not to mention unstable conditions like boost spiking, its not just the turbo that you have to worry about, excess boost, and air that cannot be exhausted will generate high exhaust manifold pressures, which generates high temps, which 'COULD' cause knock conditions and damage to rings, valves, manifolds etc

In Theory it is correct BUT depending on the extend of boost you are trying to hold. Boost dropped caused by lose of turbine pressure. Assume you can holding 20psi with a super strong actuator vs holding same psi with a gate controller the amount of pressure bleed out is identical, means turbine wheel flows the same amount air. Intake / exhaust restrictions can also simulate similar effects.

If it was a genuine 5 bolt un cropped garrett gt3071r, you sir are a fool!

On the same time I must point out this issue you currently have is not turbo related. Your engine pinned badly with 12 degrees + timing regardless the size of turbo installed. I don’t think its right to define your “problem” on the turbine housing while it was also an OP6 Genuine Nissan.

Tuners would back timing if cyc temp is high enough to detonate. Also means power lose. Unless that, the heat is not at a level of what you've mentioned. Clearly every one else using the same turbo are making heaps more power with less boost because the average timing run on those was between 15~17 degrees on a safe tune.

Btw your turbo was re-sold and installed on GeorgesR34's R34. he will post a dyno reading once tuned.

To the OP a cople of issues that you could look at but first .

From what I can gather there is no such thing as a purpose built T3 flanged single scroll turbine for the GT35 turbine - meaning a GT3582R BB turbocharger . They all appear to be re profiled (bored out) GT30 turbine housings so arguably not ideal for a 35 turbine .

I have seen GT3582R's have issues with these T3 flanged GT30 housings and 3 inch dump pipes , I'm told the tubes ID is actually a little smaller than the conical outlet on the housing .

IMO with a 3 litre engine you want absolute minimum avoidable restriction so the front section of the exhaust off the turbo possibly needs to be 3 1/4 or 3 1/2 inch tube .

With turbine housings and a given turbine wheel you get mass gas flow to a point and then the pressure rises uncontrollably because the volume exceeds the housings and waste gates ability to transfer the gas without restriction .

People tell me that a 1.06 A/R GT3582R on an RB30 twin cam engine wants to "spool up" somewhere in the 3200-3400 engine rev area . I would not expect the same from a GT3076R in the same circumstances ie same A/R turbine housing .

GT35 turbines measure ~ 68 by 61mm where a GT30 one is ~ 60 by 55mm so you'd think the GT30 would have slightly higher trapping efficiency and turn this into rotational energy at slightly lower gas speeds .

If you look at the turbine maps for these two turbos at turbobygarrett site you can see that a 1.06 T housing with a GT30 turbine gives similar flow numbers to the 82 housing and the GT35 turbine . The GT30 map looks more even than the GT35 one which is usually the case when wheels are not used in housings designed for them .

I can think of a few low key examples of what the factories do when a turbo engine is enlarged . In the case of the Z32 four cam single BB turbo VG30 Nissan used the larger than RB25 sized OP6 Hitachi turbine housing . This engine in low boost form cranked out a few more Kw than a 33 25DET and with higher torque .

Really in effect going to a larger volume turbine housing lowers the turbine inlet pressure because for the same volume flow the gas speed is lower . If you didn't want to excite the turbine and drive the compressor up to boosting revs then this is the easiest way to go about it . I'd have though that a 3 liter engine would made more off boost torque than a 2.5 and boost possibly wouldn't be needed at this point .

Ford went through all this with the XR6T engine and wound up with a GT3582R cartridge in the 1.06 T housing and if anything an undersized compressor housing . I haven't see one but I was told that the later Typhoon version actually has a hybrid turbo using the GT35 turbine with the 76.2mm compressor from the GT3076R . Assuming this is the case then this compressor in whatever that turbos comp housing is obviously makes enough power/torque to keep Fords marketing team crowing . Had Ford been turbocharging a 3 rather than a 4 litre six pot then they very likely would have used a GT3076R and experimented with 0.82 and 1.06 A/R turbine housings . I reckon if they wanted a reasonably free revving engine and not tonnes of boost the 1.06 would have been a real good try .

Any turbo engine where manifold pressure is forcing the gate open is trying to tell that the turbine inlet pressure is too high .

Also a waste gate is not intended to be a pressure relief valve even though they can be forced to act a bit like one . Its primary function is to control the gas speed through the turbine housing so the speed of the turbine and therefore the compressor wheel can be set to achieve the desired boost pressure . Obviously the higher the engine revs the more the waste gate has to open to keep the boost pressure constant . When the waste gate is opened fully by its actuator or excessive manifold pressure it can't bypass any more than its maximum and if the engines exhaust gas flow continues to climb so will boost pressure to a point . When no more exhaust gas can be forced through the system generally its pressure and temperature go through the roof and terminal detonation sets in .

Anyway I'd measure the hot side manifold pressure and if its considerably higher than boost air pressure consider going up in turbine housing size .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...