Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok been to eastern creek 2 times now with my gtr , 316rwkw @ 16psi from a to4z (stock head :) so very lagy)

this is my times so far all on falken 235 / 40 /18

12.512 @ 112.77 mph with a 1.789 60 footer

and

12.394 @ 112.84 mph with a 1.842 60 footer

and last time i went down my best time was

12.302 @ 114.47 mph with a 1.849 60 footer

ok my question is can i get faster with my current setup?(with out going to other tyres)

thanks heaps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/342955-can-some-one-help/
Share on other sites

times are close to where you would expect them with your current power and sixty foot times.

tyres will improve your sixty foot time, and run if your currently getting wheel spin.

ok been to eastern creek 2 times now with my gtr , 316rwkw @ 16psi from a to4z (stock head :) so very lagy)

this is my times so far all on falken 235 / 40 /18

12.512 @ 112.77 mph with a 1.789 60 footer

and

12.394 @ 112.84 mph with a 1.842 60 footer

and last time i went down my best time was

12.302 @ 114.47 mph with a 1.849 60 footer

ok my question is can i get faster with my current setup?(with out going to other tyres)

thanks heaps

i ran 11.36 on stock turbos, stock head, 290rwkw, 265 35 18 tyres and 1.7-1.8 60fts we talked atthe track the other night and i said then you should put on some cam gears and get them dialed in it will help reduce your lag and setting them up don't worry so much about hp as it means very little aim more for as much low end torque as you can get for you current set up, your 60 fts are ok with the tyres your running you need to get more mph

i ran 11.36 on stock turbos, stock head, 290rwkw, 265 35 18 tyres and 1.7-1.8 60fts we talked atthe track the other night and i said then you should put on some cam gears and get them dialed in it will help reduce your lag and setting them up don't worry so much about hp as it means very little aim more for as much low end torque as you can get for you current set up, your 60 fts are ok with the tyres your running you need to get more mph

125mph ??? thats 500+ rwhp trap speed..... were you able to repeat it (not necissarily the 11.36, but moreso the 125mph) ?

LOL, no way!

wayyy back in 2002 I ran 11.13 @ 128.5 (1.82 60ft) on a stock bottom end with Apexi low mounts and other little odds and sods.

315RWKW.

New owner in Tassie re-tuned it and went 10.80 at similar mph.

Maybe they were really really big killer Wasps?

They were Qld ones after all, our are bigger and stronger! :)

I think the MPH is below what it should be with a genuine 316kw. I've run over 112mph with only 250kw and ran low 12s about 5 years ago with stock engine and stock turbos @1bar.

60ft is not bad, but the fact that you're only running 112/114 mph means you are down on power. to get into the 11s your going to need a fantastic run or more power. either that or the power deliver is really bad. but with 316kw you should have higher TS than 112mph...

the car is booked in to get cam gears and surge system so i can actually run more boost.

XKLABA did u happen to get what the std cam's are meant to be dialed in at yet?

and as for lag , i don't get full boost till about 5000 too 5500rpm so yer it is fairly lagy :)

I have a genuine 500rwhp (closer to 540 actually, but lets say 500) and I did an 11.5 @ 126mph. Spose the 32GTR's weigh a bit less. Those online calculator thingies tend to agree with me though:

Vehicle Weight

In Pounds

3250 (1475kg with fuel and driver)

1/4 Mile

Trap Speed

in MPH

126

Your Rear Wheel

Horsepower

is: 507.3964497041419

Which is pretty close to what my dyno says.

If i change the weight to 1425kg for a 32gtr with fuel and driver:

Vehicle Weight

In Pounds

3141

1/4 Mile

Trap Speed

in MPH

125

Your Rear Wheel

Horsepower

is: 478

Still a lot more than 290kw...

Meh, you have the slip that says you did it. Kudo's to you. Maybe you guys are all skinny bastards and are better at stripping your cars out than me :)

I've never truly believed those online calculators. Rarely are they totally accurate.

A lot of things like diff gearing, how many gears you are changing and so on all have effects in various ways, even rim size.

I also know of two friends in stock turbo R32 GTR's that have run 11.5 and 11.7 respectively - no idea of MPH - They surely cannot have any more than 270rwkw either way.

The 11.5 was driven without one iota of mechanical sympathy (flat changed etc). 11.7 was a bit more forgiving.

Just for info sake - with ~210rwkw I was regularly running 110-112mph (2.0 60ft/RWD) @ Calder in my HR31 back when i raced regularly.

Car was just over 1400kg without me in it and under half a tank of gas. So would have been 1500kg on race day (roughly, car was never stripped)

I still think the low mph is telling us it's down on power. 316kw should give a fair whack more than 112mph.

btw most GTRs with fuel and driver will be much heavier than 1475kg. regardless of 32/33/34 none of them will be under 1500kg with fuel and average driver unless they have had some weight reduction done.

Yep, the 60' times are usual for street tyres, but as mentioned above, its the trap speed that is down. You may well have 316rwkw, however, that isn't being reflected in the trap speed, and this is were the issue is. better rubber might get you an ET in the high 11's, but the MPH doesn't lie.

Yep, the 60' times are usual for street tyres, but as mentioned above, its the trap speed that is down. You may well have 316rwkw, however, that isn't being reflected in the trap speed, and this is were the issue is. better rubber might get you an ET in the high 11's, but the MPH doesn't lie.

yea sounds like more like 250 killer wasps#

even with 3k rpm you should be charging hard to4z styles

#i have only ever done 4 drag races, check my sig apparently that dude knows how to do it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
    • Literally looks like direct port nitrous haha
×
×
  • Create New...