Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's just not practical for road cars to have a cage, period.

Sprints on cold tyres? What about 30 cars door to door battling for T1 on cold tyres.

I dont buy that argument (that sprints are more dangerous).

edit: btw that video was awesome.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

it's not practical to swap tyres out at the track?

ok, whatever.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

Look what popped up again! Ok to solve the problem could the R35 GTR stop being driven on the road as daily drivers. You are only allowed to drive them on weekends to race track and put slicks on there to do sub 1:40’s.

Duncan (LSX-438) can you please go buy another every day road car to keep the completion fair for others at sprints and do more mods to the R35 as it must only be your weekend car now.

This crap is going nowhere lets forget about it......

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

Now that would be hilarious. Dunno how many "registered" cars i've seen turn up, on trailers, gutted, caged, carbon panels with all sorts of race gear. Truth is even a car with a simple tune or exhaust is probably "illegal" in that sense anyway, no car in the paddock would pass.

Can't wait for someone to open that can of worms one day.

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

indeed....would be the easiest championship my car would ever win.

All of which makes the point that seperate and open rules for "street registered" cars are bullshit. Same with SV for that matter. Just put them in the appropriate 1/2/3/4/5 class that all cars are meant to run in. I don't see how having a log book defines which class you should be in, and more than 50% of cars are in these "special" classes now which makes it all pretty meaningless.

Regardless of anything else going on in this thread, Duncan I am surprised you are happy to be doing the lap times you are without a roll cage.

I didnt say i'm happy. I have looked into a cage, it's just not going to work in a street car.

I can see the safety argument of course, but at the same time sprints are not racing, and NOBODY is racing anywhere under CAMS without a cage.

Why change the rules to exclude the vehicles for which the category was invented for?

To me that's stupid.

A better approach is to just buy a race car, and go racing.

I can see the safety argument of course, but at the same time sprints are not racing, and NOBODY is racing anywhere under CAMS without a cage.

.

I can see what you are saying, but you are still going just as quick, if not doing quicker lap times in the Sprint series than you would door to door.

going 11/10ths in a sprint or a "race" is still going 11/10ths

you can still drop a wheel in the dirt and end up on the roof etc and a quicker car on slicks is going to have a bigger stack than captain slow in his daily drive civic.

So yes there are arguments both for and against requiring a cage in the quicker classes.

And not everyone wants or can afford to go door to door with their race car so they have fun at sprints, which isnt what owning a club racer is all about? fun? Not "you have a cage gtfo of my sprint series" etc.

Its not practical for road cars to have roll cage - its not practical for road cars to run slicks! Its not practicle for daily drivers to do sub 1.40's at Eastern Creek as an example

i dont see why not if you drive maturely.. i ran semi slicks(toyo r1r's) on my last daily(gtir) and it was awesome.. id use them again if they werent so bloody expensive for 18's

No Mate,,,this is as funny as,,,. While we are playing head games,,,why don't we get the RTA and the EPA to check the road legalness of ALL the cars with rego labels and plates.

Now that would be a barrel of laughs.

Cheers

Neil.

Just to keep the stupidness going I have plan Neil, you go buy at shitty Suzuki Swift that is road registered still. Stamp the VIN number on your car somewhere and put the number plates on the Radical take one part of the swift and put it on the Radical and you have a Radical Swift Kit Car and can run in SV with the Clubmans. It’s not your Daily drive so it will be fine........

Someone in Bankstown will give you a pink slip every year for $100 to keep is registered.

I can see what you are saying, but you are still going just as quick, if not doing quicker lap times in the Sprint series than you would door to door.

going 11/10ths in a sprint or a "race" is still going 11/10ths

you can still drop a wheel in the dirt and end up on the roof etc and a quicker car on slicks is going to have a bigger stack than captain slow in his daily drive civic.

So yes there are arguments both for and against requiring a cage in the quicker classes.

And not everyone wants or can afford to go door to door with their race car so they have fun at sprints, which isnt what owning a club racer is all about? fun? Not "you have a cage gtfo of my sprint series" etc.

NOBODY is proposing that race cars (with a cage or whatever) should NOT run in sprints at all. The issue here is some think (certain) road cars should NOT run - in sprints no less. A category invented so people with road cars can have a crack at the track. All i am saying is, if you insist on unadulterated CAMS rules - go and play in a race category.

Yeah I get that, but street cars dont run slicks do they...Which is the the issue a lot of people have.

I dont care if you turn up in a Maserati MC12 GTR, but if you want to run in a road car catagory then you should run road tyres, if you want to play with the race cars on slicks then you should have a cage like a race car.

Not directly having a go at you Dunc, But I like the Vic rules better, where if you want slicks then get a cage.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

LOL, sounds awesome!

I'm starting the "name and shame!" chant :)

I for one, chose to build a non-registered track only S13 with full roll cage because I enjoy the extra security in the event of a big crash.

As the car was not road registered, I was required to obtain a CAMS log book. (which I happily did)

If I built another car, it would keep the car road registered and install a rear 1/2 bolt in cage only and run in type SV or 3.

As people have said, at the end of the day, it's only a supersprint and we are not racing for sheep stations!

If LSX-438 wants to run at those speeds without a cage, so be it. Fingers crossed nothing bad happens.

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

....Keyser Soze

I guess it's just me but i see an obvious distinction between swapping tyres out at the track (no matter what they are) and fitting a cage. You do realise some road legal semi's out perform SOME slicks don't you? Where do you draw the line? You can't.

But it's not just about the tyres though, there have been issues/unofficial protests about engine capacity, gearboxes (dsg) window nets, wings, race seats, etc etc etc etc etc. And it's all come from a single person this year with a hidden agenda.

Hi Duncan

I would draw the line, when tyres say for racing purpose only, if I was scrutineering and you didn't have a cage at supersprint, hillclimb or rally.

Just a question, how come you didn't run slicks or electronic wing at superlap?

Secondly, I don't have a hidden agenda - the d*)khe#d that let you run in 4D (Sports Sedan) in the first place f*!ked the 4D sports sedan class, period.

Note to all - next year NSW supersprint, R35's and similar can run 4E class, this allows, for over 6ltr, traction control, no window nets, no race seats, no roll cage etc etc etc

(but must be road registered)

I like your competiton and watching R35's compete - I had no quarms on championship points or previous years - still don't. I think it is wrong that they were allowed to go in 4D and obtain records, in a totally non complying car - my opinion and the way I read the CAMs manual - and if the NSW supersprint panel continues to make new classes and changes and the owners can't nominate the correct class or get them changed to suit f'it who's gunna bother turning up. (Irace Do You?)

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...