Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That sounds like a normal GT3076 that kind of power, keen to see the dyno sheet to see how much laggier it is compared to a GT3076

They stopped intentionaly as I don't have internals. They can see this doing close to 350. No worries.

Will post the sheet when I have it.

100rwkw at 3900rpm is pretty late making power.

Do you have a plot of boost as well? It seems to be in quite late which makes me wonder if there is some improvements to be had with better boost control.

I will get that chart. Definately. I'm using a gizzmo IBC. U recon a better one will bring.power on sooner.

thats worse than my 3076r. mine makes 270@16psi on a mainline for reference internally gated

Don't look at power every dyno is different. Shape of chart is more important. So its laggier than gt3076?

.63 or .82 rear? internally gated or external?

it 'looks' a touch laggy. how does it drive?

.82

Drives very smooth. Have to admit. I wouldn't mind removing a big of lag. Just a bit. However im coming from stock turbo maybe om not that used to it. Wat things can reduce lag? Once it up and boogies it pulls like a freight train though. Lol

Really? Wasnt their goal to bring boost on earlier with the gtx?

Compare the flow maps, they flow more in the higher boost levels mainly, but also tend to be more comparable with a slightly bigger version of the same turbo. Read all of this thread, lots of pretty graphs to look at.

What made you think that?

Edited by Rolls

4800rpm for 200rwkw, ugh... Much lagging compared to a 3076

But its similar to a GTand that's pretty much where a GTX3076 sits for comparo.

unfortunately it seems Garretts GTX3x frame isn't living upto the claims

Compare the flow maps, they flow more in the higher boost levels mainly, but also tend to be more comparable with a slightly bigger version of the same turbo. Read all of this thread, lots of pretty graphs to look at.

What made you think that?

Ah ok. Have read all of the thread will be looking at getting a 3076 soon.

Dont know how I got that idea, mabey just saw the new model and presumed it would be better haha.

i would be interested to see a plot of a GT3040 (GT3082R) Vs' a GTX3076R as i think they will be pretty similar.

Really? Wasnt their goal to bring boost on earlier with the gtx?

Personally i think that that GTX range was an attempt to gain back a bit of the market share that they were beginning to lose to other performance turbo brands like Precision and Borg Warner. They seem to have been caught napping a bit and while the others were designing completely new turbos Garrett were relying on their now old GT range and didn't seem to be working on anything new.

That is also the reason why i think that the wheels are billet as the time from design to production is a lot less with a billet part than cast, and it also means that they can easily tweek the design without the expense of re tooling.

The GTX range at the end of the day is nothing more than an updated compressor, it's not a completely new turbo just a touch up on the old design.

Edited by D_Stirls

I do remember the first releases on the GTX implied they would be at least as responsive as the GT, but I have been suspicious of that claim from the start... however this result looks too laggy. I suspect something isn't right somewhere, probably a leak of some sort more than boost control.

For what its worth, the GTX3076R would really be a GTX3077R if Garrett stuck to their normal naming conventions.

I do remember the first releases on the GTX implied they would be at least as responsive as the GT, but I have been suspicious of that claim from the start... however this result looks too laggy. I suspect something isn't right somewhere, probably a leak of some sort more than boost control.

For what its worth, the GTX3076R would really be a GTX3077R if Garrett stuck to their normal naming conventions.

Anyone else actually got one of these? So I can compare how abnormally lsggy might e is. Ugh.

i would be interested to see a plot of a GT3040 (GT3082R) Vs' a GTX3076R as i think they will be pretty similar.

Someone previously posted on here (I think it was Ozz) on an SR20 they were virtually identical - you'd be forgiven thinking they were the same turbo on different dyno runs.

Found it on another forum - scroll down to post 37.

http://www.silviawa.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=58974&st=20

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
×
×
  • Create New...