Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I am very interested to see how it goes!  Obviously this is all theory, and I think there is worth in the thought experiment side of things.

If you haven't checked them, here's the turbine flow map for the normal GT35 turbine (ie, like from your 3586HTA)
GTX35_TurbineMap.jpg

 

And for the "RS" version:

GEN2GTX3584RS_TurbineMap.jpg

By Garrett's own admission/claims the increase in flow "A/R for A/R" the new RS turbine is only margainally better flowing than the existing GT35.  On paper the 1.06a/r GT35 housing will actually outflow the 1.01a/r "RS" turbine though obviously there is more to it than just that.

Edited by Lithium

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

How much power does the GTW3884 produce with the 67mm-84mm comp wheel?

1 minute ago, whatsisname said:

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

I think you missed the point of what I shared.... the difference in turbine flow between the old GT35 and the "RS" one used on the GTX3584RS is 2/10ths of f-all.  

Based off what is available on paper I would wager than the GTW3884R will make more power than the GTX3584RS but will obviously come at some cost in terms of lag but I don't know what people have actually made from the GTW3884R.  I'm guessing something close to what people used to make with GT3794HTAs

Comparing exhaust flow between the GT35 and RS turbines at the same housing size there is a difference in flow. Okay it's not huge, about 1.5-2lbs/min at the important PR range of 3.0-3.5 where most RB motors will operate. Of course anyone willing to sacrifice even more response can use the 1.21 housing where the increase in flow over the GT35 is closer to 4-5lbs/min.

If I can get around up around 530-560kW at the wheels and peak boost by 4000-4500RPM or thereabouts I'll be more than happy with the decision.

Found a dyno result for a GTW3884 on a BA XR6T. No other details other than just over 500kW @ 25psi.

Yeah, I am very interested to see how it goes!  Obviously this is all theory, and I think there is worth in the thought experiment side of things.
If you haven't checked them, here's the turbine flow map for the normal GT35 turbine (ie, like from your 3586HTA)
GTX35_TurbineMap.jpg&key=d1b86af86e594e8efdf3cee3ab44ab98bc5358f9501e4bedc092d544667fbd1c
 
And for the "RS" version:
GEN2GTX3584RS_TurbineMap.jpg&key=35a4320fb2bb48eda32282d583c64fe1572fd98d945576510c52bbd8b489e913
By Garrett's own admission/claims the increase in flow "A/R for A/R" the new RS turbine is only margainally better flowing than the existing GT35.  On paper the 1.06a/r GT35 housing will actually outflow the 1.01a/r "RS" turbine though obviously there is more to it than just that.



1.06 vs 1.01 isn't A/R for A/R [emoji6]

Three more XR6T with GTW3884R results:
427kW 21-22psi on 98
423kW on 19psi also running pump 98
490kW on 24psi Unknown fuel - possibly 98.
Found a 512kW on 20psi running E85 but not sure if it's a GTW3884 result or not

2 hours ago, whatsisname said:

Not interested in the GTX3582R GEN II, given the turbine is the same as what I've already got.

How much power does the GTW3884 produce with the 67mm-84mm comp wheel?

last one i saw was 655rwhp on 36psi through a auto sohc rb30, 144mph ish traps at 1300kg ish

What you and your mate are missing matt, is you are talking T3 housings, doesnt matter how good the turbine is..your pushing shit uphill

from 450rwkw onwards really on a 3.0...okay on a 2.0.. its t4 time if your starting from a clean sheet of paper..this will never change

your giving up spool..and power

Out of interest..the p trim turbine is hardly anymore efficient than a 3582 turbine in the real world without  being backcut alot

and the 65mm old precision turbo turbine is a turbonetics f1 wheel

Edited by jet_r31

So if the T3 housing is the limiting factor, how have people managed to run over 170mph trap speeds and the horsepower required to do so using a T3 housing?

And vls have run that close to that with 3582's with the KTS 11 blade gtx billet wheel on less boost..

my mate went 140mph on 30psi with stupid retard  backpressure(full exhaust  with gate plumbed back), others have gone 143 on 32psi.. with .82s and backcut 3582 turbines

I wonder what peak power gain I would see switching from the current FP T3 0.85 to a Garrett 1.06
463.7kW @ 25psi was all we could get using the 0.85

Saw another RB30ET make 450kW through a 2sp glide running a GTX3582 GEN I - roughly 480-490kW through a 5sp on the BW dyno

Yeh my mates vl made 450rwkw though glide on 30psi with just that 67mm comp wheel upgrade on 3582 ..went 140mph 

make f**kloads more with exhaust off...but went straight to 40psi...and maxed out 2 044's

laggy though...

you really want a pt6466 .82 t3..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes that’s what im trying to decide. Should I do stock gtt box or enclosed or open pod. 
    • Also, I note OP is in Melbourne, which begs the question... are you aware of how illegal your car will be with a turbo, and intercooler and any sort of filter change? I don't know how you can get past the "2 intake mods" "rule" that seems to exist in Vic. Fully engineered might or might not get you there.
    • If you have a turbo... then the ducting holes I used to feed the pod are not available because your intercooler likely uses them. If you have an intercooler, your IAT's are going to be goverened by how good your intercooler setup is. I'm yet to really see anyone check IAT with a snorkel/boxed pod/proper CAI versus and unshielded pod. It would be interesting! But I suspect that the differences would not be so noticeable as if you were N/A as the intercooler is where the air is being cooled.. and out in front where the FMIC would be is a pretty good spot for it.. When I was turbo I pushed the stock GTT box as far as I could and made some pretty good power out of it, and noticed on the street I never made the same power/boost. Then I did a before and after run with a pod filter versus the box and picked up about 9PSI from the same boost duty cycle and about 50KW instantly. I never ran the stock box again, and recently removed it for my N/A setup. The box is restrictive to a degree - Even with the V8 setup I noticed I picked up power by removing the box completely, so punching holes from the bottom of it to get air from the passenger guard *helps* but the most effective one in my case was simply having the ducts, a pod, and no box around it. In my experience, *more* air was better than cold air. The air (with ducts) will be cooled off as you start moving, and especially if you start moving fast (a race track). It actually moves around quite a bit as you can see.  
    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
×
×
  • Create New...