Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You reckon the ultimate rear housing would be a divided tial s/s concoction? Im sure the tial v band s/s housings must have some benefits other then easy attachment to the manifold and stainless to retain thermal energy.

We've machined up a few rd blocks with the nitto 3.2 crank. the only feed back we've heard is 1 got under 8 seconds down the quarter (methanol nos 60psi and sohc, dedicated drag car)

You have been using RD28 blocks?

You have been using RD28 blocks?

Tuffer than a gtr500 block with ultra thick cylinder walls and extra webbing everywhere.

bit of dicking around to match to a twin cam head and about as heavy as a 30 block or even heavier but strong as all getup.

A mate has been thrashing the shit out of a 3.2 litre built on this block making over 700 at all 4 for 3 years or more. Bombproof!

Im pretty sure that most of that strength advantage of the RD28 block begins to dissapear once you start boring and stroking them. The only thing that would help a little is the external coolant return from the head near the back of the block on the right side.

The standard bore being 85mm does make the cylinders thicker, but in order to maintain coolant flow between the cylinders in the block, the OD of the sleeves is still around 92-93mm maximum. So 4mm cylinder wall thickness at best with a 85mm bore.

The ability to run the squirters would dissapear with larger strokes as well unless you were to slot the crankshaft like an OS giken crank, or like I did when fitting my modified RB30 crank to the RB26 block.

You have to clearence the sides of the block for the rods when the stroke is greatly increased. See the attached picture and how close the No3 rod bolts are to the side of the case, and the required case clearencing. This is an RD28 with a 90mm stroke. There will be 1mm clearence from the rod to the crankcase. The main caps are billet alloy and the main studs are offset drilled from the standard 10mm holes, to 14mm. The standard RD28 cradle wouldn't clear the 90mm crank.

Being in Australia its really hard to pass up on the RB30 block just for how easily they are obtained and adapted to an RB26 head. In my opinion, there are other opportinities such as sleeving that people should really consider a lot more befoer heading down the RD28 conversion path.

post-26553-0-52348900-1324201290_thumb.jpg

Ive seen that picture somewhere before. Very tough setup.

Possibly on the GTR UK forum. Its from an 8 second R32 GTR in Urkaine. He ran an 8.16 with this setup. A rod went through the side of the block though, and now a new engine is being built to replace it.

Possibly on the GTR UK forum. Its from an 8 second R32 GTR in Urkaine. He ran an 8.16 with this setup. A rod went through the side of the block though, and now a new engine is being built to replace it.

is the owner rebuilding another rd28 or making a switch to the rb30?

is the owner rebuilding another rd28 or making a switch to the rb30?

He's keeping the RD28 block and replicating what he had with some improvements. Availibility of the block is the main factor though. RD28 blocks are easier to source than RB30 are for him.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
    • It sounds like you want what the Toyota Landcruisers have for their roof racks. Wanna know what you end up with? Rust holes in the roof, and water everywhere...
    • Discovered today that if I select reverse first and take my foot off the brake, then select drive, the drive indicator light works and so does the tiptronic gear indicator. 
    • Ok so after much research and talking with knowledgeable people I've got my turbo conversion done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.  Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd. But nothing drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic.  I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Does anyone here have any ideas?   Cheers guys
×
×
  • Create New...