Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

been reading the hypergear hiflow thread and the hypergear site. im interested in their turbo upgrade for rb25det with the G2 profile. has many people here used one if so what are your thoughts on it. im only looking at running betwee 450hp and 500hp+ what are your thoughts

Do you mean 450-500 engine hp? So 280-300rwkw?

First of all, I would be wary what profile people think they have as a G2 profile wont make over 270-280rwkw. Most people have the G3 profile which is similar to a 3076 in size so can make 280-310rwkw.

I have a G3 profile but in a standard compressor housing and am very happy.

Do you mean 450-500 engine hp? So 280-300rwkw?

First of all, I would be wary what profile people think they have as a G2 profile wont make over 270-280rwkw. Most people have the G3 profile which is similar to a 3076 in size so can make 280-310rwkw.

I have a G3 profile but in a standard compressor housing and am very happy.

the standard compressor housing is .63 right?

I think you mean exhaust housing. There are two different standard exhaust housings the R33 one and the OP6 one on the R34. Pretty sure its smaller than 0.63.

Mine has a larger 0.82 rear but with a standard compressor cover on the front.

I do think this is all answered in the Hypergear thread.

I think you mean exhaust housing. There are two different standard exhaust housings the R33 one and the OP6 one on the R34. Pretty sure its smaller than 0.63.

Mine has a larger 0.82 rear but with a standard compressor cover on the front.

I do think this is all answered in the Hypergear thread.

cheers

Just think about this. Whatever power a hypergear turbo will give you. A Garrett can do it a lot better, less lag and everything. I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that "hypergear" talks up these turbos waaaay more than they deserve.

Just think about this. Whatever power a hypergear turbo will give you. A Garrett can do it a lot better, less lag and everything. I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks that "hypergear" talks up these turbos waaaay more than they deserve.

so how many Hks turbos do u own? because its all so been proven that hks do the same thing to garret but your not raging on them.

from what i have seen hypergear are very good for the money

What you talking about. Garrett make turbos for hks. I had a Garrett 3076r. And I've seen hypergears variant which gives the same power... with 1000rpm more lag. Clap clap

yes but under Hks blade designs . and you are not gonna try and tell me that hks don't spool better?

maybe this guy cant afford garret , much like u clearly cant afford HKS

What you talking about. Garrett make turbos for hks. I had a Garrett 3076r. And I've seen hypergears variant which gives the same power... with 1000rpm more lag. Clap clap

Not true. They are almost identical, new ones with ceramic balls are even better. lol

What you talking about. Garrett make turbos for hks. I had a Garrett 3076r. And I've seen hypergears variant which gives the same power... with 1000rpm more lag. Clap clap

Yawn, more turbo options for people with different budgets can only be a good thing. I will go call Garrett and see if they can make me a turbo that uses the standard compressor cover makes 280rwkw on 15.8psi and bolts straight up to my standard piping for just over $1k.

If your happy with your turbo enjoy it otherwise it just looks like you are upset with your choice.

What you talking about. Garrett make turbos for hks. I had a Garrett 3076r. And I've seen hypergears variant which gives the same power... with 1000rpm more lag. Clap clap

I remember seeing your dyno sheet, there are some serious inconsistencies with your speed axis. The dyno shows it coming on boost way before any 3076 on this forum also the dyno stops at a speed that when you transfer to rpm comes out at 6,000rpm. I highly doubt the tuner stopped tuning at 6,000rpm. Dont believe everything you see on a dynosheet.

I remember seeing your dyno sheet, there are some serious inconsistencies with your speed axis. The dyno shows it coming on boost way before any 3076 on this forum also the dyno stops at a speed that when you transfer to rpm comes out at 6,000rpm. I highly doubt the tuner stopped tuning at 6,000rpm. Dont believe everything you see on a dynosheet.

Possibly run in 3rd gear :)

Hypergears are good, well mines good, had a few problems here and there, but worked out well, been using mine on track and drifting , mines pulling 250kws on 17psi , very good power delivery where are you located? if you wana have a feel of my power pm me you can come past mine bro and il show ya

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yup good one, well how come everyone elses GT3076s are so laggy in comparison then?

Also, could you please explain why the tuner would stop tuning at 6,000rpm? Surely something as good as a 'fkn garrett' could perform all the way till 7,000rpm?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...