Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok starting to come to end of my build not long to go now :) cant wait :) , BUT how do you work out what compression ratios are needed?

obviously my machinist is going to work out what it will be But he isnt too sure what compression i need, he suggested 9.5 to 1 ???

just some info on the motor

rb30 full forged bottom end will be reving too 8k too 8.5krpm

head will be ported , cams , bigger valves , etc

turbo is unsure i was going to be ruining a to4z but a few people saying not too , and their is better options out their for what i want, witch is around 800rwhp on E85.

will mainly be using E85

not sure what other info you need just ask

thanks for any info

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/346997-compression-ratios/
Share on other sites

i thought i can chnage a fair amount with differnet head gaskets?

and just so i know , what Compression should i be aiming for?

you can lower the compression with bigger head gaskets, you cant raise it as the compression figures for the pistons are based off 1-1.2mm head gaskets and you wont get one thin enough to make a big difference without running into issues with the pistons hitting the head.

idealy on E85 you want to try and aim high as your builder has said 9.5-10:1 if you can (arias make pistons off the shelf for the RB30 to do 9.8:1)

o ok fair enough :), how much more lagy would a GT4088R be?

me allways up for more info guys :)

A GT4088R is only a little bit laggier than a T04Z because the GT4088R is a more modern turbo. Even that will be at it's very limits to make 800rwhp. Still too laggy for circuit IMO. The turbo I'd be looking at is the new GTX3582R. It flows similarly to a GT4088R but is a smaller, more responsive turbo. It's because of the new billet compressor wheel. A GTX3582R with a T4 twin scroll 1.06 turbine housing should make 700rwhp and an absolutely INSANE midrange. It'd hit boost early and hard and just PULL all the way to the redline. It'd definately FEEL faster than a GT4088R with 800hp.

honestly 600rwkw and circuit, you have gotta be kidding!

think of the heat, braking, oil/water temps.

id be doubtful there is many, if any such GTR's around.

the closest i can think of was the street driven Racepace GTR which on full race fuel ran around with about 450-500, i remember seeing it had actually twisted the turbine housing.

Now think about the heat over years...

The other car that comes to mind is the Russ/High Octane which is an outright race car, still isn't 600 @ the rubber because i dare say its pointless :)

outright power is nothing compared to a well sorted and reliance brake/suspension/aerotrack car.

I agree the GTX35 sure does look like one the choice.

I just picked my engine up from the builder and I am running 9.3 compression ratio. I used arias pistons. Obviously head gasket or decking will affect the comp ratio slightly. Im running 25 head on forged 3 litre bottom and obviously with decent cams and valve springs and appropriate head work. Ill be running a gt35 turbo and hope for about 400 rwkw to start with.

Imho that will be plenty of power for a pure circuit car. Its a 33 gtst by the way.

f**k peddling an 800 hp car around a track lol

LOL @ 600rwkw circuit car! Marks car has I'm told around 520kw at the treads and it's is on struggle street putting it down with some of the best suspension/tyres money can buy, let alone having another 100hp.

But you say that it will be mainly E85 to run 9.5-9.8:1 it would have to be ONLY on E85 you wont get away with PULP and 9.8:1 unless you rev limit it to 4k rpm and 2psi.

Oh btw will this be 4wd (GTR) or 2wd?

Doesnt say in the thread anywhere

the bsm car made around the 450rwkw mark from memory and dave he said it was a scary ride and i've been in the car with him around easten creek and he can really drive, 600rwkw on a track is never going to be used a so very pointless, even on street it would be dangerous at best that kind of power is only any good for dedicated drag cars or dyno whores

Edited by XKLABA

Over 400-450rwkw (550-600rwhp) would be the region given you can pretty much get 380-400rwkw now on PULP with a big motor

I highly doubt you'll get bored when over a 2-3 year period you see seconds upon seconds drop off your lap time.

As that's where you'll find the fun... And i hate to say it, spend more money :P

Learning to actually drive a high powered car etc.

If all you have is a built motor and not much else then you'll have more problems to worry about then getting bored.

Suspension/braking/cooling/tyres/gearbox and overall reliability will be more of a worry than how much power you'll be making.

Heat is a MAJOR issue and you could spend half a year getting it right.

If you get bored you can always upgrade the turbo later once you've had a few seasons of roundy roundy. ;)

With that power you'll also be well into the 10's to boot so it'll be good overall that's for sure.

I also had a look @ your For Sale thread last night as i was reading the forum...

Honestly, your cars setup now, won't even handle 400rwkw on the circuit.

You brakes will run out after a lap or two, you'll certainly have cooling issues and without a wing IMO it'll be all over the place if there is any higher speed cornering and so on.

Suspension might be ok, but you'll need adjustable arms and all sorts of stuff to help it along.

It just sounds to me like you have a big motor and little else to support it :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...