Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, I have been reading this thread alot actually as I went in Sam's 305rwkw 4dr 32 and these turbos are very similar to the td06 he ran.

The power with these is very impressive, while I still enjoy my Garrett, I cannot get outta my mind the td06 copy simply when I went for a drive with Sam.

Essentially it was like a light switch, all of a sudden this absolute enormous RUSH and in 4th we went sideways. He was laughing his ass off, as was I... while screaming.... the Garrett by comparison is extremely linear and pulls harder and harder, but sometimes I like that instant smack of boost.

I've spent too much on my setup now to change, but I assure you that td06 copy DID push 305rwkw

Make up your mind, you often chastise 56trim GT3076Rs for 52trim ones - they are barely different in size. If the compressor affects response that little, 52trim GT30Rs are redundant :)

That is all oversimplified anyway, the compressor has a lot of affect on how boost threshold is achieved - loosely speaking the exducer is responsible for accelerating the air, the inducer is responsible for drawing it in.

You can actually make a more "responsive" turbo by having a larger sized exducer (fine balance between extra mass and extra "throw" off the tips which is where extended tips come into play).

Same goes for Garrett GT series turbines, they are often physically smaller for the equivalent than Mitsi/Borg turbos but they use a less abrupt blade attack angle through the turbine, meaning they are more of a high speed turbo. Lighter, but don't necessarily respond as fast to low speed gases for the equivalent size... so give or take a bit a Garrett GT series turbine would be normally the equivalent in response and flow to a larger say Borg Warner one, for sake of arguement.

I could go on for fricken ages, but the gist of what I'm saying is don't assume that all things are comparable just by mm measurements of a pair of wheels on different turbos.

Obviously size and trim are only a part of the equation, I know, as there is the design involved aswell. Be it so simple why would new technology arrise? We have always had control over size and trim, its not like it takes 30 years to think of a new size and trim combo.

What I'm saying is, while I have bastardised and simplified the terms to a ridiculous extent, I realistically just wanted to put forward that I have lost faith in simply dropping compressor size to make up for a lack of response. I am more so looking towards matching the largest and most efficient compressor to turbine as possible. That being said I still like the 52t 3037 combo better than I do the 56 :P

I also would like to put forward that my hunt is not for the most PSI at the lowest RPM but actually the broadest powerband within usable RPM limits, irrespective of boost pressure acheived at any RPM.

I have never read many good things about the TD05-20G. Seems to be a bit of a mismatch in wheel sizes. The TD05-18G is the way to go it seems, the 20G is just too much compressor to be spun by the little TD05 wheel....also on a plain bearing turbo running a mismatch of wheel sizes means you end up with higher bearing loads as at rpm as the axial load increases...or so I read

But the TD06-18G could be a good thing. I have been told the TD06 wheel is a good thing and its the 20G compressor that makes the TD06-20G as laggy as it is. So a TD06-18G could be a good thing, good sized turbine so that you can get good boost and flow without too much back pressure and a light little 18G wheel that is good for 240-250rwkws. I think the problem is the shafts are different diameters

car is booked in for a tune next monday, finally ahha. Somthing i noticed is defferent between my T67 and simon/batteries, mine had a bullet type nut on the compressor, came like that from factory...

Well now I'm just jealous! haha

Is your turbo ID tag the same as mine, as in a Kinugawa tag with T67-25g as the model?

Good luck with the tune :)

how jealous? hahahaha. seriously, this is how it was when i got it.

post-18938-0-05211500-1305028487_thumb.jpg

and anyone in vic that might be attending the show n shine at carribean gardens on sunday the 22nd of may, i should be there with the car, i might be entering with another club just for the hell of it, not for trophies, just for somthing to do.

as for the tune... it will be interesting to see, especially auto with a powerFC, ive since been told that powerFC's werent made for autos.... makes me wonder if the ecu is a powerFC ive never looked lol, thats what i was told it had when i bought it. i know its not a stock ecu because i have a dyno sheet from the previous build from the previous owner, oh well might pull it out tomorrow and double check it.

the guy thats tuning it thinks we should easily make 300rwkw on 17psi without pushing the engine 2 hard. its being road tuned apparently.. i dont know much about the tuning side of things, just the mechanics of it all. then cross fingers with some slicks, + the auto, im hoping for a mid to low 11 as simon has done.

btw simon what oil are you running in your engine, i need to throw in some new stuff before the tune. im running Motul Turbolight 10w-40, but ive been told i should go up to a 10w-60. any thoughts?

cheers.

Edited by OMY31T

hmm Im not too sure about the consistency of Mr Kinuagawa.

My right angle oil line feed is different to both of yours.

Initially I received the wrong V band flange but I contacted him and I had a new one sent to my door inside a week.

He also had 2 different listings for the T67 on ebay with one being $50 cheaper, I messaged him about this and he said they were exactly the same...

nothing major but something to be aware of if you buy one.

Good luck with the tune OMY31T im interested to see your results with the stock plenum vs Simon's with the "freddy".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...