Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so i have sent my address, and once i recieve some, ill let u all know, get some details off the poeple that want them... simon, battery, arthur.. and others, depending on how many come in the mail(i asked for around 10) :D

This ever happen?

Plus Battery any chance of getting some vids up of performance? Would be keen to see some 3000rpm pulls in 4th to see when you get 15psi (same as my video) :)

One is internal gate one is external gate?? . go the t67 btw

theyre both internal gate.

the ext gate one i posted was just for reference to see if anyone managed to fit it in low mount.

T67 is a beyond 300kw+ turbo and is way more then i want so the extra lag is not needed.

These days it seems increasingly hard to beat a hypergear turbo. These SS turbos are nuts.

The kando's are actually better for more specific applications, like the T67 for big power like what Simon has shown. The 20g is yet to make its mark with anyone, we are still waiting on results from a couple of members (previously including me). Jap dynos have shown 12cm 20g's to crank close to 300kw and stand up stronger than a 3071.. Now we are working with 10cm housings which really have no restriction in seeing 300kw, so the results should be interesting. Certain well regarded tuners have also shown interest in results from the combo, it should be good.

Downside is you need a gate, whereas with HG its all bolt on. I think there will always be tradeoffs between the two, and Stao is limited by the internal gate.. Yet if working on a budget they are both viable, however if stealth fitment is a desired option, the tradeoff (expected to be small) to a HG would be worth it.

What if someone tried one of these?

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=49179-04100&Category_Code=

That'd probably give things a bit of a shake up - especially if FP were extra nice and put one of their 68HTA cold sides onto one :)

have anyone here tried this?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Nissan-RB25DET-R33-TD06H-20G-/270789860335?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3f0c555bef

would the 12cm be too laggy on a RB25 NEO?

looking for a unit that can be low mounted as i want to avoid the high mount path.

also cant tell the difference between the two apart from the $200 price difference?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-TD06H-20G-12cm-T3-RB25DET-/280720132071?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item415c3947e7

target goal is anywhere from 290-300 (more is a bonus) i believe the t67 that simon has would be too laggy for me, so the TD06 would be ideal.

RB25DET NEO

built bottom end

has all supporting mods already.

PULP only, no E85 here

currently running a twin turbo setup but looking for more power and just weighing up costs for upgrading twins VS single big low mount. (So far the low mount ends up cheaper but it is for the turbo to be high mounted which im trying to avoid)

ideally i would like this one but not sure if it'll fit in low mount position?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Turbocharger-Kinugawa-TD06SL2-20G-w-T3-V-Band-Housing-/290598627474?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43a9072892

the last one u listed is the one I have its a tiny turbo and will low mount very easily with a 10mm spacer. Plus you need to plug in a gate somewhere.. i got it because apparently the internal gated ones are no good..

If i ever get my car back from the panel beater I will fit it and tell you how much power it makes..

btw I got it for 700 as well so make em an offer ;)

theyre both internal gate.

the ext gate one i posted was just for reference to see if anyone managed to fit it in low mount.

T67 is a beyond 300kw+ turbo and is way more then i want so the extra lag is not needed.

The actual trust 20G for a 1JZ comes in a 12cm job, which is what i based my decision to get one from. They did not appear to be laggy yet I was dubious.

For the price of the housing swap I think its worth a go. There is a version with the rear housing uncapped and a 5 or 6 bolt outlet (not the single exit 3 bolt outlet).

However from what I have seen the trust IW item was the 3 bolt item (with the WG flapper not direct flow).

What if someone tried one of these?

http://store.forcedp...&Category_Code=

That'd probably give things a bit of a shake up - especially if FP were extra nice and put one of their 68HTA cold sides onto one :)

Ive considered these time and time again... The front housing on that one is the trust spec housing but no idea what rear housing its got. If its 10cm its probably the item to have.

I am however even thinking a TD05H-18G would be good (Y) they are not shy on power even in small housings. Get one in a 10cm and your laughing.

This ever happen?

Plus Battery any chance of getting some vids up of performance? Would be keen to see some 3000rpm pulls in 4th to see when you get 15psi (same as my video) :)

Yeh im sooo lazy... I tested a while back but i can't remember the results!

Picked up a greddy gauge with peak/warning to replace my stuffed HKS so ill hook that up soon and set it at 1 bar then test it again.

theyre both internal gate.

the ext gate one i posted was just for reference to see if anyone managed to fit it in low mount.

T67 is a beyond 300kw+ turbo and is way more then i want so the extra lag is not needed.

As much as I hate to say it the Hypergear things are starting to look pretty attractive if your after Internal gate options.

i ran a ext gate right off the rear housing on my old turbo, might do it again if the td06 can be low mounted - appears it can be according to ARTZ post (look forward to pics when u get your car back mate :D)

perhaps i can get a custom low mounted manifold with ext gate opening on it.

ideally id like it low mounted and to have near 300rwkw.

hypergears do look very good however not many ppl are pushing over 280 with their turbos on PULP so its hard to see some decent results with the ATR43G3 apart from Staos personal development car.

300rwkw and low mounted would be the perfect setup imo :D

theyre both internal gate.

the ext gate one i posted was just for reference to see if anyone managed to fit it in low mount.

T67 is a beyond 300kw+ turbo and is way more then i want so the extra lag is not needed.

the middle one is ext gate? . Wouldn't you rather a turbo with plenty of headroom for more power instead of ringing its neck to make the power? :thumbsup:

300rwkw and low mounted would be the perfect setup imo :D

GT3076 with internal gate off stock manifold?

the middle one is ext gate? . Wouldn't you rather a turbo with plenty of headroom for more power instead of ringing its neck to make the power? :thumbsup:

No because that means extra lag for no good reason?

Edited by Rolls

GT3076 with internal gate off stock manifold?

No because that means extra lag for no good reason?

cant get the 3076 for $900 now can ya :P

my ideal setup would be the td06sl2 10cm on a low mount custom manifold with ext gate.

the hks cast low mount manifold would be perefct but theyre rare...

wow, i just found out that 6boost do the low mount custom jobby with ext gate. WIN!

Td06L2 10cm t2 housing pulled 302rwkw today at the shop, all round nice setup.... for 900 hucks.

got mod list & dyno sheet trent?

Td06L2 10cm t2 housing pulled 302rwkw today at the shop, all round nice setup.... for 900 hucks.

More info PLEASE! I'm prepared to beg.

Graph too if you can. Thanks in advance mate :whistling:

cant get the 3076 for $900 now can ya :P

my ideal setup would be the td06sl2 10cm on a low mount custom manifold with ext gate.

the hks cast low mount manifold would be perefct but theyre rare...

wow, i just found out that 6boost do the low mount custom jobby with ext gate. WIN!

Yeah I nearly bought the one (HKS mani) in for sale the other day cause I have an old HKS gate to suit, probably should of but i dont have alot of faith in second hand cast parts I cant see before I buy :(

now I will have to weld it onto the housing ghetto style too, doubt i can afford the 6boost low mount atm..howmushizzit??

Actually if i sell my old turbo..hmm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...