Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Trent do you have any results from SR20's.

I'm buying a TD06-20g 8cm. Hoping i did the right thing =)

I just red all 33 pages of this, Love it =)

Buy the L2 dont get the plain 06 variant.

This car had a GTRS on it (red line) and it lost nothing with the L2, this car has a little more lag than normal as VCT is disabled.

STD SR20 with 264 HKS cams on std valve springs etc..

post-34927-0-65490100-1313720508_thumb.jpg

Yeah I nearly bought the one (HKS mani) in for sale the other day cause I have an old HKS gate to suit, probably should of but i dont have alot of faith in second hand cast parts I cant see before I buy :(

now I will have to weld it onto the housing ghetto style too, doubt i can afford the 6boost low mount atm..howmushizzit??

Actually if i sell my old turbo..hmm

around $1200 + delivery lol :O

cheers for the graph Trent, i rekon one of those will be perfectly suited to a RB25.

You wouldn't happen to have a dyno graph of a RB25 with one of these turbos by any chance??

Buy the L2 dont get the plain 06 variant.

This car had a GTRS on it (red line) and it lost nothing with the L2, this car has a little more lag than normal as VCT is disabled.

STD SR20 with 264 HKS cams on std valve springs etc..

That is awesome considering it's compared with a HKS item.

How much boost?

That is awesome considering it's compared with a HKS item.

How much boost?

19peak, the gate was a little lazy (ebay) so its missing about 20 mid range kw too... as it cracked open @ 15psi.

Thats insane!

How do you think it would go on an 8cm housing or you think thats a dud choice? There are also 8cm IW housings that Kando sell.... Man these things just got back on the map for me!

Thanks Trent, sorry for so many Qs.

P.S. Told you ARTZ!

Thats insane!

How do you think it would go on an 8cm housing or you think thats a dud choice? There are also 8cm IW housings that Kando sell.... Man these things just got back on the map for me!

Thanks Trent, sorry for so many Qs.

P.S. Told you ARTZ!

10cm only for rb25 reckon. 8cm will miss out on too much mid torque and kw. If you got it run with it but if it was mine id use the 10cm.. ive had a few IW gates not perform so until i can confirm it being the turbo or the car i will stick to the ex gate.

Buy the L2 dont get the plain 06 variant.

This car had a GTRS on it (red line) and it lost nothing with the L2, this car has a little more lag than normal as VCT is disabled.

STD SR20 with 264 HKS cams on std valve springs etc..

Holly shit thats good.

Thanks Trent =)

This must be on e85 tho yea?

Holly shit thats good.

Thanks Trent =)

This must be on e85 tho yea?

conservative BP98 tune, peak timing was only 9 odd degrees took 12 no dramas..

but being std i was worried about longevity as it gets the shite drifted out of it.

conservative BP98 tune, peak timing was only 9 odd degrees took 12 no dramas..

but being std i was worried about longevity as it gets the shite drifted out of it.

Please comment on this vs a 8cm :(

FOR AN SR.... lol... will the 8cm make it much more responsive or is the extra flow of the 10cm only going to make it better better better?

here some pics of it compared to stock turbo..

inlet is 3 inch but comp wheel is the same diametre as stock just with bigger housing

DSC03038.jpg

but baby got back :P

DSC03035.jpg

I'm really not too keen on welding gate onto the housing but many do it and say it works fine..

What the biggest comp cover that fits with the standard RB 25 exhaust mani(with a little spacer) is it 3 inch?

and what would the TDO6H-20g with 12cm housing IW housing be like?

anyone have a rough idea with spool difference form 10cm to 12cm- 300-400ish rpm?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

I'm ready to buy now , What do you guys think of this one, with the SL2 rear wheel, haven't seen this one up there before.

I want a turbo that can do 320- 340rwkw(in a manual) i don't need anymore than that as i will be trans limited, so if i can

knock of a bit of top end flow and pick up spool, then all the better

http://www.ebay.com....984.m1438.l2649

What would a TD06SL2-20 G 10cm external gate do maxed out on a RB25?

you have any idea STATUS?..anyone?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...