Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys heres 1 from the go pro. Cracked 4th gear skando's down the straight. Next time ill have the camera a littke bit lower soit can see out of the window better

If it doesnt embed can some one help with it.

[url="

[/url]

Ok guys heres 1 from the go pro. Cracked 4th gear skando's down the straight. Next time ill have the camera a littke bit lower soit can see out of the window better

If it doesnt embed can some one help with it.

[url="

%5B/quote%5D

Nice driving mate :)

Even when you just cruise out of the pit area you can tell that turbo gives the RB lots of low down zing. Very very nice.

I tried to embed the video but it didnt work, it seems simple enough but there must be a trick to it..

You would want this part of the URL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHj1yVLbPfw

And what you would have to embed it would look like this:

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHj1yVLbPfw[/video]

Also it appears that simply putting in the URL above with no video tags works too:

Almost thinking of putting one of these on the 2.8 im building. Do they make something suitable for a greddy manifold? im not too sure if the flange is the same as a t4, i may have heard the bolt spacing is a little different.

Haha dude this car is built at home. That includes a by eye wheel alignment.

I honestly dont want to get a wheel alignment and do other mods because it handled exactly how i like.

But i ordered the gate and extra lock spacers so i have to get it done before wakefield on the 8th.

Im hoping the 44mm gate will do what i need even with a 38mm pipe from the manifold

No need for wheel alignment, jus undo the bolts from the hub and align the s/wheel till its straight or close to centre and rebolt back to hub lol

Hope it all goes well for ya. But by the looks of things, it will be a killer once boost is set up properly and on a small budget as well, good work mate.

Almost thinking of putting one of these on the 2.8 im building. Do they make something suitable for a greddy manifold? im not too sure if the flange is the same as a t4, i may have heard the bolt spacing is a little different.

What flange is on your greddy manifold? If its T4 then no.

T3 or 3 bolt then yes.

T67 10cm would be nice on the 2.8, be sure of how much power ur chasing then pick the turbo to suit. Dont concern yourself with picking one to suit your manifold, it doesnt work like that.

i know the power i want, but its the mani thats concerning me as if it dont fit then ill stick with the trust turbo. Use what i have available to me for now as i am thinking of going 6boob and an efr down the track when they sort the delivery issues with them out.

U guys post up dyno graphs too ok, dori's the next one i guess? I just hope these td06sl2-20gs are responsive- im using the benchmark gained from ss series turbos:

80rwkw@3000rpms and 180-200rwkw@4000rpms

But i guess how these turbos FEEL as in kick to the nuts is very different to a dyno graph...so thats gotta be the deciding factor--- i like a good hard kick to my nuts when it comes and lots low down snappiness

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...