Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hes taking his sweet time isn't he lol...

If someone wants to lend me a Kando td06sl2-20g and will pay for a tune ill be happy to take my T67 off and give it a try in the name of science!

LOLz...had alot on man, end of year is always busy for me...Also just got bak from marathon trip around the snowys and blue mountains.. and a bit of QLD..done over 3500kms in the last week..

and while On the subject I must say the NSW mountain roads rock, they shit all over VIC offerings :(

Also dodgey ebay injectors were dodgey..flowed at 300cc...f**kin, applied for refund and have dodgey ebay guy threatening legal action cause apparently I'm lying, interstingly its f**kin hilarious in a "I want to smash you flamin mongrel" kind of way...Anyway turns out the guy who tested them for me had some 555 nismos so will get them instead..Adaptronic is here, that had scrathes on it too, kind of weird for a brand new item but looks ok..

then I want to tap an IA sensor into my intake, etc etc cmon guys you know what its like.

Anyway enough of my excuses... :whistling:

"I want to smash you flamin mongrel"

Adaptronic is here, that had scrathes on it too, kind of weird for a brand new item but looks ok..

LOL @ true blue rip off artist, flamin mongrel!! or was that the forum correcting a c u next tuesday comment? LOL

Where did u buy the adaptronic man? disappointing to hear it came with blemishes :S I assume you bought it new....

yeah its new ,had some little scratches on it like someones tried to jimmy it open..weird..

the injectors were tested side by side with some stock nissan ones, I guess they are sr20 ones or something and they flowed identical..cant say i wasn't warned :/

guy had a great trader rating so not sure what his game is as yet...time will tell.

Now that one is interesting... That could be a good 350kw turbo (not sure if it would be better than a T67 though..)

Kando has some good stuff rolling out :S

Yeh unfortunately without any real testing back to back its just a guessing game........

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

Ok so i finally sold my hks2530 ready to purchase a kando td06sl2 . My setup is going to be:

rb20det (seems rebuilt or very very healthy)

gtr 444cc injectors

gtr cooler

power fc

z32 afm

full 3in exh (with high flow cat and de-cat for track)

hks 40mm ext gate

gtr fuel pump

ok my questions are : i have r31 rb20det cams laying about , would these be worth chucking in? , secondly , fuel . In tas we have 3 options of 98 , 1 bp ultimate ,2 caltex , 3 united (ethanol) . Do you guys think it would be worth trying the united 98 over bp? (caltex is the most common but i've heard stories of it not being very good quality)

Ok so i finally sold my hks2530 ready to purchase a kando td06sl2 . My setup is going to be:

rb20det (seems rebuilt or very very healthy)

gtr 444cc injectors

gtr cooler

power fc

z32 afm

full 3in exh (with high flow cat and de-cat for track)

hks 40mm ext gate

gtr fuel pump

ok my questions are : i have r31 rb20det cams laying about , would these be worth chucking in? , secondly , fuel . In tas we have 3 options of 98 , 1 bp ultimate ,2 caltex , 3 united (ethanol) . Do you guys think it would be worth trying the united 98 over bp? (caltex is the most common but i've heard stories of it not being very good quality)

No to cams, don't bother!

E85 is heaps better than 98, but you will be out of injectors and fuel pump pretty quickly :)

Ok , cross cams off my list . No E85 at servos in tas :( , i could order it in drums but i didn't think the fuel pump or injectors would be able to keep up

Which united has 98 Toff? BP ultimate is probably the mokset reliable but obviously quite a rip off, calted just add octane booseters to their 95 to get it up to 98 so its not as high quality as the ultimate

Yeah i've been running my r34 on it for a while :)

My setup is going to be:

rb20det (seems rebuilt or very very healthy)

gtr 444cc injectors

gtr cooler

power fc

z32 afm

full 3in exh (with high flow cat and de-cat for track)

hks 40mm ext gate

gtr fuel pump

bought this: http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/270877815374?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649#ht_2526wt_503

I'm going to get it tuned on united 98 (unless someone can give me a good reason not to ) , Will let y'all know how it goes :)

http://www.ebay.com....=item3f11b64fb1

Anyone post that one up? Gt3582 comp wheel with 11 blade TD06h turbine with .73 T3 housing.

Now that one is interesting... That could be a good 350kw turbo (not sure if it would be better than a T67 though..)

Kando has some good stuff rolling out :S

I'm really curious about these also. I'm currently waiting on a price to strip, assemble and balance my old hypergear GT3576 with a KD 3582 compressor wheel and cover kit. Depending on what the Perth thieves I mean professional turbo workshops charge me. I might end up buying 1 of these.

I would love to see(work out) what would make more power and be nicer to drive on my RB30 between the KD 3582, TD06H-25G or even a 10cm T67

I'm really curious about these also. I'm currently waiting on a price to strip, assemble and balance my old hypergear GT3576 with a KD 3582 compressor wheel and cover kit. Depending on what the Perth thieves I mean professional turbo workshops charge me. I might end up buying 1 of these.

I would love to see(work out) what would make more power and be nicer to drive on my RB30 between the KD 3582, TD06H-25G or even a 10cm T67

It all comes down to your goals mate. Be it myself I would probably go a T67.

IMHO It will go like a shower of shit. Probably hit peak torque very early and wont need to rev it very hard, however without E85 I dont see it doing over 350kw (as a sheer maximum, it may not actually hit that either).

My second option would be the TD06H-82 hybrid (3582 compressor on TD06H rear). My guess is that this combo will be something like a 'GT3282' or 'GT3240'. My guess would have it more responsive than an actual 35R with a similar power threshold. I would love to see this one in action.

I'm hoping someone here will be able to give me some advice. I know its a Skyline based thread but information on these with use on a rotor is very limited to non existent.

I have a FD3S (13B-REW) and the twins are very much on the way out. I have been looking at one of these as a potential single option.

I have it down to the following -

T67-25G 10cm

or

TD06H-25G 12cm

Being a rotor I am leaning more toward the TD06H as it has the bigger rear. Looking at the TD06 kits Trust supply they seem to use a 16cm rear.

The goal for the car isn't massive power, it currently makes about 300-310rwhp with the twins in non-sequential setup (fairly laggy). I guess I'd like a little more power. Say aiming for 380-400hp?

Some thoughts on the above?

Edited by mr_squiggle_1

I think rotors want the big rear housing or big turbo.. These are more small housings aimed at 4 banger type setups (and being exploited by us 6 pot guys).

You could run one but I think you will be capped, you should probably look at a PT6262 or something like that.

Otherwise the twinscroll 3582 variant Kando does may suit you :thumbsup: its towards the top of page 90

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...